Zebra Mussels and
Inland Navigation
Background Problems on Vessels Risk Evaluation Control Strategies Other Threats Links
Background:
Zebra mussels were successfully introduced into Lake St. Clair in the mid-1980's, probably as a result of ballast water release of a ship coming from Europe. They spread quickly throughout the Great Lakes and into the Mississippi River drainage basin causing significant problems for industry using the inland waterways. Zebra mussels have been a common problem for industry along European waterways for over a century. Structures and vessel operating along the European waterways have therefore been designed with zebra mussels in mind. When zebra mussels invaded North America, however, there was no freshwater organism that caused significant fouling and zebra mussels had a swift and direct impact on both the economy and freshwater ecology of North America.Problems on Vessels:
To better understand how they affect boats, it is useful to understand how the zebra mussel makes a living. Go to zebra mussel biology and towboats čEven under
Anatural@ conditions, zebra mussels are most commonly found in the crevices of rocks and other hard surfaces. In these crevices zebra mussels have contact with the flow of the water without being directly exposed to abrasion caused by the direct flow of the river. In towboats, they are commonly found inside the sea chest and in the piping leading from the sea chest. The most frequent complaint in this area is that zebra mussels are causing reduced suction by blocking both the piping and the grating covering the sea chest. Blocking of the covering on the sea chest can also lead to increased sedimentation.
Zebra mussels are also commonly found in the recessed areas around some keel coolers. Without some control measure in place, zebra mussel populations can become quite dense and may reduce the efficiency of heat exchange through the channel. A dense build-up of zebra mussels in this area can also lead to accelerated damage due to pitting.
Zebra mussels are occasionally found attached to the hull, particularly in areas where there is a crevice, a dent, or some other shelter from very strong current. Hull infestation can be particularly excessive if the hull has been out of service for several months or longer. Although infestation on the hull is not generally seen as an operational hazard, zebra mussels attached to the hull of the towboat or barge can be transported to uninfested areas and start new populations (see
Infestation /Invasion Scenario).
Risk Evaluation:
There are a number of factors to consider in evaluating a vessel's risk for zebra mussel infestation. These factors are both operational and structural.Operational Considerations: Vessels operating primarily on the Illinois, Ohio, and Upper Mississippi rivers tend to have the largest infestations of zebra mussels. The water on these rivers is relatively cool, slow and contains only a moderate amount of suspended sediment - very good conditions for zebra mussel growth and survival. In addition, the lock and dam system and extensive backwater areas may offer greater opportunities for the development and retention of zebra mussel larvae. Vessels operating primarily on the lower Mississippi will also suffer some infestation, but maximum infestation levels are likely to be much lower. The lower Mississippi has reduced opportunity for settlement, and the high temperatures and suspended sediment cause periodic zebra mussel die-offs during the summer.
Risk Evaluation |
||||
|
High |
Medium |
Low (No) |
|
Operational Considerations
|
Range of Operation: |
Range of operation includes the Upper Mississippi, Ohio, or Illinois Rivers |
Operation exclusively on Lower Mississippi or Tennessee Rivers |
Operation on non-infested waters and/or salt water |
Dry Dock Schedule: |
Infrequent dry dock schedule (greater than once per year) |
Dry dock once a year |
Dry dock every six months |
|
Structural Considerations |
Raw Water Usage: |
Extensive raw water usage for critical systems |
|
Raw water usage not in critical systems / back up systems available |
Size of Sea Chest: |
Small |
Medium |
Large |
|
Piping: |
Narrow diameter piping, low flow rate |
|
High flow rate (greater than 6ft per second), copper piping |
|
Zebra Mussel Control: |
No zebra mussel control in place |
Antifoulant paint only inside sea chest |
Antifoulant and/or heat treatment in place |
Vessels that come in frequently for maintenance can be checked and treated for zebra mussels at the same time. Vessels which are in the water for more extended periods of time - such as excursion vessels, face a higher risk of zebra mussel build up.
Structural Considerations: Zebra mussels will only affect systems that have contact with raw river water. When operating in a medium or high risk area, you will have at least some zebra mussel infestation. You must answer the following question: is it critical that these areas remain free of zebra mussel infestation?
Zebra mussels will attach to the walls and grating covering the sea chest. Zebra mussel infestation may reduce the size of the sea chest, reduce suction and increase sedimentation by blocking the grating. Infestation in the sea chest may also lead to infestation in the piping system. Narrow diameter piping will become blocked more quickly than larger diameter piping. Copper is toxic to zebra mussels and copper piping will not be vulnerable to infestation.
Several commonly used alternatives for zebra mussel control are listed below. Heat treatment and anti-foulant paint have been recommended by the US Army Corps of Engineers for zebra mussel control on Corps vessels. Despite some potential problems, some have chosen to use chlorine to treat for zebra mussels on towboats. An effective treatment using chlorine is suggested below. We have only listed non-specific treatments for zebra mussel control. There are many companies that carry other products. Some of these products or treatments may be more effective for your operation.
Back to Top
Control Strategies:
Reactive Treatment |
Treatment at Dry Dock |
Pressure washing |
Pigging |
Preventative Treatment |
Passive |
Anti-foulant paint |
Active |
Heat |
Chlorine |
Timing of active control |
Potential Benefits From Control |
Reactive Treatment
Treatment at Dry Dock
For most towboats, zebra mussel infestation does not interfere with vessel operation between maintenance periods and mussels can be removed at dry dock.
For mussels accumulated in the sea chest and on the hull pressure washing with hot water or pressure washing after allowing the mussels to desiccate may be most effective. It is not necessary to pre-treat the surface by spraying the mussels with chlorine. This extra step does not improve the effectiveness of pressure washing and it introduces an extra hazard for maintenance personnel.
Mussels may also build up in the internal piping system exposed to untreated raw water. Some shipyards clean this area by pigging. This procedure is akin to that used for removing obstructions from a sewer line. This procedure is fine if there is only minimal mussel build-up, but problems develop if the infestation is more severe. At least one shipyard has had to remove a section of piping that became completely blocked during pigging.
The disadvantages of reactive treatment are:
Preventative Treatment
If dry-docking is infrequent or there are critical areas on the boat that must be maintained free of zebra mussel buildup, there are several alternatives for preventative control:
Passive Treatment
Several vessels have had the sea chest and the covering on the sea chest painted with anti-foulant paint. The most effective anti-foulant paints contain either (1) copper or zinc which are toxic to zebra mussels, or (2) contain silicone that discourages attachment. If a vessel has had zebra mussel build up in the recesses around the keel cooler, it is advisable to paint the area with anti-foulant paint as well. The results from this treatment have been very encouraging, and there have been very few or no mussels found attached to areas treated with anti-foulant paint. It is unclear whether zebra mussels are still able to attach to untreated piping leading from a treated sea chest.
Active Treatment
Another alternative is treatment with heat. This method is advocated by the US Army Corps of Engineers for zebra mussel control on Corps vessels. REF CORPS WEB SITE If the temperature of all the water in the sea chest is raised to 1000F for at least one continuous hour, all zebra mussels directly affected by this water should be killed. In order for this treatment to be effective, it is important that the heated water affect the covering on the sea chest as well as the area inside the sea chest. This treatment has not been installed on any vessels yet, but has been recommended by several experts on zebra mussel fouling. The advantage to this type of control is that the piping system can also be treated without risk of increased corrosion.
It has been noted that zebra mussels are able to attach to areas around the skin keel coolers despite the high temperature of the engine water. It is possible that the raw river water moving past may offer the mussels enough relief from the high temperatures of the coolers. This area, however, needs further study.
Recent experiences have shown that regular applications of chlorine can be effective in controlling zebra mussels on vessels operating on the upper rivers. Vessels using this method of control have reported no mussel infestations in the sea chests although mussels are still found attached to keel coolers if they are not treated with antifoulant paint. To get effective control, one chlorine puck (like those used in pool strainers) is introduced into the sea chest once a month. This form of chlorine is easy to handle and requires minimal retrofit. The disadvantage of using chlorine is the increased risk of corrosion to the sea chest and piping.
Regardless of whether heat or chlorine treatment is used, it is not necessary to treat every month of the year. Abundances of larvae are very low from 1 November to 30 April and treatment during this time is therefore unnecessary. From 1 May to 30 October, treatment should be done monthly to keep new larvae from becoming established. In this way, zebra mussels are eliminated from the system when they are very small, and no problems are caused by the release of larger shells from dead animals. We strongly recommend that the treatment water be discharged while the vessel is underway to minimize the effects of very hot water on the animals living at dockside.
Potential Benefits from Control
: Zebra mussel populations do best when the environment is stable. Because the larvae are continually being transported further downstream, upstream populations are to some extent dependent on inoculation from downstream populations. By installing zebra mussel controls on commercial and maintenance vessels, reinoculation of inland waterways will be reduced and this may lead to lower zebra mussel populations throughout the system.Back to Top
Other Threats
: Currently, the US Army Corps of Engineers is building the Chicago Sanitary & Ship Canal Dispersal Barrier in Chicago, Illinois. If successful, this barrier will protect the Mississippi River drainage basin from invasion by other exotic species in the Great Lakes. Of particular concern is an aggressive, bottom-dwelling fish: the round goby. If the round goby successfully invades the Mississippi river system, it may have substantial negative impacts on native small fishes. Click here for further information about the round goby.Although zebra mussels have become the focus of attention, it is possible that domestic towboat and barge activities can also transport other unwanted species.
Links to Further Information:
Zebra Mussel and Other Nuisance Species Information
Deep Draft Shipping and Aquatic Nuisance Species