SOMETHING TO THINK ABOUT?

       Amongst the con lines of media presented disinformation agents, there is an old, worn, stupid cliche' still being used. Something implying that "If a person is charging money for information, then that person is bad, only interested in money, and the information is also bad."

       Well, I don't know from what planet or foreign communist country such media presented authorities who spit out such dribbling, drooling, nonsense come from. Where they idiotically profess that money doesn't exist, as if all belonged to the state as they do. But the last time I looked, I was living in the U.S., a country founded on "Free Enterprise" where money is a tool to be freely used. By a free people in whatever direction they choose to use it, as best demonstrated in what the American people have been able to accomplish in just a couple of generations. From walking across a nation behind covered wagons to walking to walking on the Moon.

       I find it very suspicious that the media presented authorities that propagate this Un-American, Non-Productive, Destructive, Fodder, all seem to be doing quite well and have no problems with acquiring whatever they want. And whenever such authorities are pinned down to accounting for how they do their alleged research without the money they condemn others for using, they most always answer up with the "Advice" that researchers should be funded by "Sponsors".

       "What sponsors?" Government working to hide information? Or universities that belittle any not in their elite little clubs such as doctors, and lawyers do when looking down on people? Or foreign governments and groups looking to damage the U.S.?

       What kind of media presented researchers would say such stupid assinine things demonstrating their total ignorance of this American system? Perhaps the same government sponsored scientists down on their knees kissing up to the backsides of politicians begging for their daily bread to sustain themselves. While they propagate what their "Sponsor" deems fit for public consumption, in the way their "Sponsor" wants it presented, for their "Sponsor's" use? As perhaps was demonstrated in Hitler's "New World Order" of burning books? Where lots of scientists came from?

       Think about this for a moment; When you take your time to drive to work to produce something of value, you take money from your employer for your time don't you? Are you a bad person for doing that? Would you spend your time and your money for gasoline to drive to work if you didn't get paid? Of course not, because you couldn't afford to keep buying gasoline or food to live on. You'd be forced to quit and go do something else to survive wouldn't you? If you went into a business for yourself, perhaps producing valuable information at your own expense, how long would you be able to stay in business and present information if you gave the information away for free? Not very long before you would be forced to quit and go do something else to survive, wouldn't you?

THE BOTTOM LINE QUESTIONS

       Of the media presented authority researchers who say that "If a person is charging money for information, then that person is a bad, only interested in money, and the information is also bad"; Are they working within our "American Free Enterprise System" or for some "Foreign Communist Country" where "Money Doesn't Exist" and "All Belongs To The State" as they do?

       Are they deliberately trying to hurt Americans by damaging their business and credibility in an effort to put them under their control? Take whatever they have and ship it off to where ever for the glory of whatever tyrant Kings and Queens of Father Lands?

       Are they "Advising" American researchers to turn away from American ways and join with "Foreign Sponsors"?

       Are they part of a coordinated disinformation attack on the American people, intended to confuse and pit them against each other in non-productive, time-wasting diversions while they undermine Americans' beliefs, ways of life, government, the legal system, the medical and other industries, and the schools? All perhaps to pull down America for the interests of foreign governments through a foreign involved media?

       Does what they present, in the way they present it, promote or destroy?

copy right 1998