The UFO Meeting Group, which promotes the UN in their regularly scheduled UFO meetings in the Los Angeles area, have their own select list of speakers who work the crowd. Once, a woman gave an impressive talk on aliens then presented pictures of rag dolls as the aliens. How's that for wasting time and detering people from looking into UFOs? Another of their speakers, an analyst, made a presentation involving abductions. If anyone related information on that subject to him, he tried to make appointments for them in his office; after which, anything that person might desire to communicate could be discarded as coming from someone requiring professional mental help. How's that for stopping information? Another of their speakers waged a vicious attack on a respected UFO researcher involved with one of the most famous UFO cases. A question here: Is this group looking into UFOs or looking to stop information regarding UFOs? This groups' most presented speakers restate the same things year after year. How does this groups' presentations compare with the tactics used at larger UFO shows to hurt and detour people attempting to look into UFO's? Does what is being presented, in the way it is being presented, promote or destroy? All while placing blame for disinformation on the U.S. Government.
My personal experience with this group was this: They approached me to join their group
when I was becoming popular making presentations at UFO shows. They used me as an
advertisement at the shows by telling people I was a member of their group in order to get
people to join. They then put me on their never-to-speak list and denied me access to the
use of their tables to present my material. I began to be squeezed out of presentations.
It worked like this:
"Oh, you must purchase table space to present your material"
"No problem, here's money, how much do you want?"
"Oh, it all has to be
done through our secretary"
The secretary who is not available, ever! Meanwhile, when people inquired of my material,
they were told that I had stopped printing it.
Is there an underlying connection of similar unethical practices throughout these different presentation agencies? Perhaps involved with keeping secure sensitive material and information some people or some thing doesn't want known? Is this part of a coordinated effort, using the same systems of disinformation, being used in the same way? Does what is being presented, in the way it is being presented, promote or destroy? Does this follow the same patterns as can be found in magazines, groups, UFO shows, etc.?
