This page is being modifyed, sorry..

So Space is 3 dimensions of a measurement where as time is but one. But how different is one space dimension compared to one time dimension? There are even more points that can be made to both in comparison but the problem is that they both seem so similar. Albert Einstein concluded that they are exchangeable but not the same. Hence spacetime rather then space and time. He also stated that they were both like descriptions of some thing but not constants them self's. How ever if time could be reversed an object moving along the points of time would be exactly the same as moving along the points of a single dimension of space. This is also speaking of time in its smallest state. One dimension of time is but a point and if one dimension of space is but two points, then why not say space is dimensions of time? Time is often misconceived and not brought down to its simplest form. Most can only imagine time in space, time for an object, or even that time dose not exist but is just change its self. I understand these points and even could yield to the point that there is no time but only space that can be bent and broken down into a single dimension. However in essence That single dimension of space is time, so why though time out at all?
 
  Lets say one of spaces dimensions, take length , was the dimension of time constantly moving or changing. Then we changed the other two dimensions of space to the same changing dimension. You would  have three dimensions that are always changing and always moving. Think about that .. Would that not be exactly the same as space-time? The same space and time as we know them. My Point being is that there is only three dimensions and that they are all time. However all three of those dimensions are actually one dimension twisted around its self.
 Twisted time you say? What sense dose that, how dose that work how is that posiable? How can time bend over its self or twist up? What Physics describes that play with time? How can that be Tested?
 
 Space and time are both measured by points, space having more.  So what is a point? You can measure things to your hearts content, in fact you could measure half a distance half a time then once more half half half half .. exs .. However the problem is you will always have half to go be for you reach the other side or point of what ever it is you are measuring. So the best way to cut to the chase is by starting at a point, undefined, unsaturated, just a random starting place of any measurement you would like and that is a point. The point if measured by a smaller measurement or the point broken up into smaller points could then be thought of as a wide void in you initial measurement. In fact the internal void could change the properties of the point. However the same type of changes would be happening to all the other points to that scale, and a ratio of distance between points could then be devised to show how the points are different from each other. This ratio or difference would become incarnate the further out you measure by another ratio. This falls in to the half of half scenario again. However you can see how the cycle repeats if you keep measuring in scales, levels or distances that are the same. If however the scale, level or distance between the points changes you start to see that something happens to a value or ratio between them. The ratio stays the same. An example would be if the distance between the points of a single dimension of space increased at a rate (a distance equal to the size of a points) then you would see a constant ratio that can be measured rather then a ratio that keeps changing. So you could say that the key to explaining a Point is to always have its references changing at an equal rate or ratio.
 
 So if time and one dimension of space are each measured by points with undefined differences between them. As I explained there must be a ratio of space to time if you have there references constantly changing.  The only one I know of that is crude at best, is the speed of light. Why crude? Well you see if an object starts moving with acceleration its time slows down, and its mass increases and so on but the point is its time slows. So there is a distance an object can travel in which its time slows down (Now this is all seen by an observer the object experiences but no slowing of time if observed its self).. This would be like a single reference to time is not continually changing, however all the other references are. This single reference is the key to the ratio, for if answer is a single constant this must be it.  So the distance at which light travels in a second makes an objects time slow to 0 seconds if observed. Then time is stopped in space-time at the speed of c or 300,000kmps. Now if space is striped apart by three (dimentions) and then compared to time for a distance. Then you would get a rough 100,000km  for every second of time, and that is the ratio between time and space. So that is the difference between time and space. Now lets get back too how time gets twisted..
   First another story, one thought up by Albert Einstein. Lets say you have a fish bole filled with water.. Now you have a ray of light heading in a straight line angle in words the top of the fish bole. Now when the light hits the water the light bends inward.. The reason why is because the water acts as a medium for the light. Now the med. of water is more condensed, more compact then the air out side of the water. Now you can think of the light ray as an object with mass in space and the water as a point where time slows.. The object traveling , once it hits the slower time  (or water), moves in word toward the bottom of the bole.  Now if you could imagine this 3 dimensional using the earth and an out side object, You would see that the object would fall toward the earth once it hit a slower aria of time, this is gravity.. So Gravity or the gravitational force is really a slower aria of time in space.. Now how that aria of space became slower is because of matter.. But before I explain more about matter.. Back to the twisting of time..
 So time is, in its simplest form, a point. As it changes/passes in logical terms it is a bunch of points in series. However they change and move because time doesn't stand still right? So the past changes? How is this possible? What's dose this mean?
   Well if you had a line of all these points we define as points of time. One point could conceivable be considered slower or a lower point in time right?
  Because if all the points of time are constantly moveing / changeing.  Then they must be moving some where, and so the opposite direction they are moving would be considered the slower or lower points. Remember that gravity is a slower aria of time in space. So if you had a grater slower aria of time in space next to another slower aria of time in space. Would the one not fall into the other?   (This is a lot like action and reaction) the point of time in front would then be attracted to the point of time behind but the point in frunt of it would be more attracted! So what happens is a snake like coil of the line of points. However like I said before the measurement between the points or the void of the point constantly changes. Form a perspective it looks a lot like spegettie or a bunch of noodles increasing in size.. Now If the points fall back on each other because of the movement of time the points could fall back and surround a single point. This serenading of points then could cause denser aria of points that are constantly changeing \ moveing. In fact this is what space is. You see its expanding and contracting on its self at the same time.
 However why is there only 3 dimensions of space.. If points could be defined as round in space could time not be more defined? In that case what is the shape time takes on in space? Why would time have a shape at all? Isn't time just a measurement? And if a measurement is in the past why would it change or become something else? If there is a measurement in front of me and that measurement is never the same from another measurement to another what dose that mean.? Think about that sentence. Logically it would mean that you are using other measurements to measure a measurement. Or an example you are using the same side of a ruler to measure inches and centimeters but the lines marked on the ruler are nether inches or centimeters nor are the lines ever the same and they change every second. Confusing? Yes because you could never do that in your head unless you could place some reference points on the other side of the ruler for centimeters and the deduct that all the other lines are inches. This is the same as remembering the past to make sense of the present. So the past is only the same in our minds so that we can make sense of what's happening or what's going to happen. The same as a single constant when all other references are changing.  You can deduct allot about past present and future this way. However I'm off the main subject again so back to twisting time.
 
 Time is like a horizon in space if not placed into points of measurement or if the points are spread out in space. The shape of time in space would ultimately take on that of a sphere. Just like a point it dose not matter were you start in its measurement or how big the circle is just that you have a starting point. Then line them up  in series from start to finish.   The line of spheres fall back on them self's, like rain in almost random directions down the line. Because time ultimately slower in the sphere or time before. A single line piling up into a big heap, but three dimensionally an expanding circle with mismatched points of time every where.  Why? Because time would try and straighten out yet some points cant find / atract to,  a slower/previous point in time because that point is serenaded by other faster points and so on and so forth for the faster points finding / atracting to faster yet points. The once straight line of time is now a tangled and torn.. Yet it will never come to a straight line if it keeps expanding, which is really another strange thing.

 Any way it is my theory that some of these clumps of time or twisted arias so commonly found are leptons and particles , waves caused by other arias of time changing. Some of the points gathered around other slower points are shattered off by a/an moveing / incomeing slower points or after points.. These are the same as the laws of  Physics in the big world.. The Quantum small world is harder to see because of the relating points and how they are truly aligned. Basically you would have the same thing inward affected by the outward world.. If this or all existence came to an end it would could be in a blink of an eye if all the points of time are alighted right or time its self stops moving , which I could explain is impossible.. However subspaces are possible which the twisting of space folding in on its self ,  in pointillism would be a division of a point into other points. If you were following well you know that a point is undefined aria a non true end or start, so space folding in on its self could happen or even visa versa, the universe could be lager then imagined.. Its the observer that keeps every thing going, which leads me to believe there must be a god who started all of this, his observation of time caused it to divide and move by dividing more in to more and more divisions. I don't think this chain reaction will ever stop unless every observer stops observing..