Dialogue: A Reply On PVL-Dance
Nathaniel Bobbitt & Phyllis Douglass
The text here is by Phyllis Douglass an active choreographer. Replies by Nathaniel Bobbitt are in red print. Your reply is welcomed too!
The result is a number of sequenced tasks.
Gestures have some external "cue" which guides the gesture
. Also, there is an intuition in dance which is based on the "performer's
readiness" to go from one gesture to another. These elements help
take the visualization at work to be more physical yet internal. Other
neighborhoods of visualization are to be found given this orientation?
The next step is how the choreographer structures motor and articulatory resources in a dancer?
This approach is valid only if it helps to free dance composition from occupying the same old neighborhood on the stage and regarding the quality of dance motion. There has to be more to dance orientations besides grace, contact, running, and acrobatics?
When the piece is performed for an audience, the original focus needs
to be there as you execute the movement. Otherwise, the audience will "read
dance as a series of visual objects", because that is all it will
appear to be. But sometimes, the dance was meant to be exactly that.
I am working with dancers as they provide visual resources which take aim in an environment. Dancers lead me to understand the musical notion of accompaniment in terms which are visual and work based.
I could be looking at welders too as they take aim!
Whatever, I am looking for "know-how" and physical responses to behavior which link the computer environment with real world scenarios.
One example of a physical response to dance would be, imaging with "physical playback."
Imaging of sense data needs to find alternatives to displays of data in numerical terms (tables, plots, graphs). I am proposing a representation of data as a "physical playback."
Another example of imaging is the capability to show in parallel or sequentially several stages of a behavior as it gets refined, accentuated, etc.
A person on the outside witnessing task realization, is incapable of
mapping the mental and sensory components resultant to the task, unless
the task is familiar.
Also, paper is used because of the tactile experience which the dancer holding the paper has. The holding of the piece of paper is something that is readily evident to a viewer but needs some kind of amplification, some kind of a physical playback!
From the capability of the physical playback motor behavior in the dancer's hand, fingers, and rhythmic sensibility could be exploited so that "physical playback" and dancer sensorimotor resources can be brought into an exchange.
In essence, the audience does not understand where the artist is coming from, or from where the movement derives. But, this "vision" is not always necessary for the audience to move beyond viewing dance as a series of visual objects.
1. To create greater on-scene realism in remote distance instruction or image human behavior.
2. A teacher ,remotely or otherwise, may need to see both what is evident and "intangible" in a student's motoric sensory behavior.
Of your random examples only the last one has possibilities to explore
excitation and control in dance behavior. Consider the acrobatics in the
last example in terms of selection... selection of a landing spot and the
transition from one landing spot or stopping point. Consider balance and
the readiness of respiration in the case. There are some time variant and
real time computing issues at work in this case, if we use "physical
playback."
However, PVL can be utilized as a creative tool for recognizing and utilizing the mental and sensory components of a movement (dance) to create and develop choreography.
The groundwork on PVL started with how to develop a graphical syntax which works on paper as much as a computer program. This I see totally as a matter of a diagrammatic "shaping" tool. PVL is not so much a computer program as a set of rules and ways to notate "concept maps " and "flow charts."
It can be used as an improvisational tool, with the dancer reacting to other elements within their environment. It can heighten the depth of understanding of dance through the definitive focus of the movement. PVL would change the representation of dance in performance through more cognitive visualization of the movement.
Only if I can help dancers to think about environmental space and background scene description during a dance which challenges motoric resources and human vision.