Waduzitdo 2001


A Language for the Clueless


Brian Connors
6 April 2001

In the beginning was the personal computer. And it was good, though not much more than a whizbang toy when you came right down to it. And this guy, name of Larry, always had his friends asking him, "What does it do?"

This is an easy enough question to answer now, but in 1978 when all you've got is a box of blinkenlights and your friends think of a computer as something that fills up a room and screws up your tax refund checks, the point of the question is a little more urgent. After all, your friends just saw you drop how much on that thing?

This guy, name of Larry, decides to do something about it. He calls it Waduzitdo and uses it to write silly little quiz programs for his friends. The language is sort of like (and probably based on) Pilot, a fairly ugly cross between Basic and assembler that has sunk into considerable obscurity (but is still available from The Retrocomputing Museum) but a lot smaller. It's not Turing-complete by any useful standard; while it does have conditionals and branch instructions, it doesn't actually do anything to the data it eats. Thus Waduzitdo 2001.

1 Waduzitdo Level 0

This is the original language, documented second-hand thanks to some anonymous CS prof somewhere. The language itself is, like Pilot, very much like a simple assembly language with opcodes and data fields. Looks a little like this:

1.1 Basic Concepts

Obviously we've got much more memory to play with than Larry did in 1978, so things are a bit different. We could be nice and make the whole thing stack-based, but that would be too pretty, elegant, and easy. So we got two registers: the accumulator and the match flag. The accumulator holds one value, either a number or a string. The match flag holds one value, either true or false.

This should get you backwards compatibility. Worry not about the fact that the original spec says "character" as opposed to "string"; I'm not.

1.2 Syntax

All statements take the form

modifier opcode: data

Data may be blank if you've got nothing to put in it. The colon is mandatory. You may not use a semicolon. I don't care if you want to use a semicolon; you're not allowed to Period.

1.3 Opcodes

T type displays data on the console
A accept accepts one line of input into the accumulator
M match compares data to the accumulator and sets match flag to TRUE if true, FALSE if not true.
J jump If data is 0 or nonexistent, jump back to the last accept statement. Otherwise, jump forward by data * markers.
S stop Stop program.

1.4 Modifiers

These are sort of part of the opcode kinda. They tell the interpreter how to interpret the following line.

* label Marks a line that can be jumped to
Y if yes Executes the following line only if the match flag is set
N if no Executes the following line only if the match flag is not set

1.5 Differences from the Original

Wdz2K1 is slightly more capable than the original because the restrictions on the design aren't as tight as they were on those early personal computers. Therefore, Wdz2K1 explicitly specifies the accumulator variable that the original spec implied, and adds the stipulation that it can handle data more complex than a single character. The truly lazy implementor can do something funky with the string matching that kicks the whole thing back to a Perl interpreter or something like that and do regexp matching, but that would be silly.


Endnotes

Please let me know if I can add any more lame jokes to this section.

  1. The man's full name is Larry Kheriarty. I've lost the original citation for his article, sadly, and Google can't find any home pages with his name attached, but it showed up in Byte Magazine some time in 1978 and was reprinted in a book with a title along the lines of BYTE's Big Book Of Pascal. Either way, Hats Off To Larry.
  2. 2001, to those reading this after the Apocalypse.
  3. Get it?
  4. Pilot -- Not to be confused with the pen or the PDA. Though a version of Pilot for the Palm would be kind of fun.
  5. Waduzitdo? Apparently not much...
  6. accumulator -- Not to be confused with the floor of my bedroom.
  7. I could implement it the other way around if you want.
  8. Wdz2K1 -- Our official abbreviation. It would make a great license plate, wouldn't it?
  9. silly -- And you wouldn't want to be silly, now, would you? It'd be... uh... silly.
1