Basic Pulsor Space-Time Dynamics




From dredeyedick@hushmail.com (D. Manchester) Date 26 Feb 1996 08:16:28 GMT  
Summary Discontinuous Spacetime Model  
Keywords Mandlebrot, Euler, Penrose, Twistor, Spinor, phase-space,  
Newsgroups sci.physics  
Message-ID <4grq8s$6fc@news.continuum.net>  



>From Vead@q.continuum.net (D. Manchester)  
>Date 10 Feb 1996 07:10:03 GMT  
>Summary Discontinuous Spacetime Model  
>Keywords Mandlebrot, Euler, Penrose, Twistor, Spinor, phase-space,  
> Pulsor, quantum, "gauge theory", chromodynamics  

Hi. I notice that (like me) many in this newsgroup are involved in fractal computations.  
Forgive me if this posting is misdirected, but on the chance this is a place for a wierd perspective  
on the Mandlebrot set, I have advanced some ideas about it in the last part. Please contribute any thoughts regarding the strange attractor discussion.  

Thanks,  
  Dave M.  


Synopsis of Pulsor Model

for

Space-Time Events

(C)Copyright 1996 David C. Manchester
The purpose of this paper is to briefly sketch an outline for
a new quantum theory of Space-Time based on a modified version
of Roger Penrose's Twistor and Spinor work.

CONTENTS:

Preface

1. The Basic Idea

2. A Simple Model

3. Image and Message

4. A Reason for Chaos.

Preface
For the last 22 years I have thought long and hard about quantum
physics, various gauge theories, chromodynamics,
information and communication theories.
My reason for bringing forth my thoughts
here are twofold.
First, I am aware of my limits as a mathemetician;
and second, I would share these ideas with those
who may be better equipped to refine them,
validate or disprove them.
Please forgive any errors on my part. In the words of Valentine
Michael Smith, "I am only an Egg."
1. The Basic Idea
The Basic Idea I have is this: Space-Time is a quantised phenomena.
Each quantum of Space-Time serves as a channel
through which Mass-Energy
may flow.
Each moment inflates, transpires, and collapses
in the phase space described here.
The phase space for these events is a mutually orthogonal,
ortho- normalised Hilbert Space.
All vectors are taken to be unit-vectors.
2. A Simple Model
The model for these events I have chosen is a somewhat modified
version of a Penrose Twistor. The difference from a classical
Twistor is that it Pulses. I shall call it a Pulsor.
A Pulsor has 3 nested portions.
When all 3 portions are present, we have a Space-Time event, like a quark.
When only the inner 2 portions of the Pulsor are present,
Space-Time is in one of two states of flux:
Inbound collapse,
or Outbound inflation.
When only the inmost portion of the Pulsor is present,
Space-Time is absent;
only a "shadow" trace of the immediately
adjacent fully inflated Pulsor is reflected there.
A complete cycle (starting with a fully inflated Pulsor)
defines a quantum of Space-Time, able to be
considered as a "moment",
a "Stitch in Time".
Thus, in this model a quantum event could be described as:
EVENT--->Inbound Collapse--->IMAGE--->Outbound Inflation--->EVENT ...and so on.
3. Image and Message One particularly intriguing (to me) aspect of this model is that it reduces Space and Time to the roles of Media through which Mass and Energy may flow. And it permits the tools of Information Theory to be applied to the analysis of quantum phenomena.
In this model information is conserved. For the Physicist it may offer a way to balance the trend of Space-Time toward maximum entropy against an equivalent amount of negative entropy within the inmost portion of the Pulsor, which in this model is not subject to the one-way arrow of Time, since it exists (a misnomer) beneath the outermost portions of the Pulsor, a sort of "sub-Space-Time".
 
4. A Reason for Chaos
About 400 years ago
Leonard Euler interrelated our five most important mathematical constants
in his famous equation

(i*pi) 
e         = -1.

Normally we take this a just a convenient way to interpret our number system.
But what if there is more to it than that? Why is this the way it is?
I think that Euler's equation says something quite profound about
number theory, and the limits of mathematical epistemology.
I contend that these 5 constants (e, pi, 1, 0, -1, and i) behave as
strange attractors in defining any possible mathematical system.
(or any that seek to encompass quantum reality..dcm 11-96)
There is one other hypothesis I would make in this regard. Some
observers have looked at the Mandlebrot Set and come away with the
impression "Who ordered that?"


I speculate that it may well be that there is a relationship between
Euler's equation and the particular shape of the Mandlebrot set.
I therefore put my speculation in the form of a final question:
Could it be that the Mandlebrot Set is a sort of "error-correction"
mechanism that uniquely ties together our Universe across the Pulsor
discontinuities?
Is the Mandlebrot Set
the Strange Attractor for Our particular Space-Time?

[Or is it the Lorenz Attractor? -dcm 5-97]
If so, does it also serve to unify all possible World-lines
across the entire surface of existence?
As a scientist, as a human, I don't know.
I have more questions than answers.
Perhaps I always will.
AFTERWORD
I wrote this and sent it out
to get feedback and constructive criticism.
Thank You in Advance for any insights You want to offer.
...David C. Manchester (vead@www.uconect.net)
...February 9, 1996
...Niantic, CT
Base image from NCSA Computational Relativity Group
[ Base image from NCSA Computational Relativity Group<] ========================================================================= "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion,or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."
- Amendment I to the Constitution of the United States.
In God We Trust
(C)Copyright 1996, 1997 David C. Manchester
dredeyedick@yahoo.com =========================================================================


 




Site Design by David C. Manchester
Copyright © 2000 David C. Manchester
Graphic Images Copyright © 1994,1995,1996,1997,1998,1999,2000 David C. Manchester
1