Since I have owned
both a Geo Tracker, and a Jeep Wrangler I can honestly
give a fair comparison without being biased. First of all
let me just say that a Geo Tracker is NOT a Jeep, and
comparing it to a Jeep would be like comparing a kitty
cat to a tiger. But since many people seem to think it is
a competitor and alternative to a Jeep, perhaps my
comparison is justified. -- written by Jeep
Thrills Webmaster |
GEO
TRACKER
- 1.6 Liter engine
- 80 horse power
- 2 dr convertible
- No roll cage
- Extremely small wheel
base
- Looses value quickly
- Parts & accessories
few
- Higher roll over
possibility
- 2.4 safety rating
- 6.3 reliability rating
- Modest off-road
capabilities
- Made in Canada
- Introduced in 1986
|
JEEP
WRANGLER
- 2.4 Liter, and 4.0 Liter
engines
- 180 horse power (4.0 L)
- 2 dr convertible
- 6 point roll cage
- small wheel base
- holds value very well
- parts & accessories
plenty
- fair roll over
possibility
- 7.2* safety rating
- 8.2* reliability rating
- Excellent off-road
- Made in USA
- Introduced in 1938?
|
Is definitely not for
everyone, but for some it may be a better alternative
to a Jeep. It's smaller, lighter, rides like a car,
and is very good on gas mileage. It does feature a
convertible 2 door, and has modest 4-wheel
capabilities. It is intended for people who don't
want a Jeep, but would like some of the benefits of a
Jeep, while still maintaining a more stock
"feel". Around my neck of the woods I see
more women driving Trackers then men. To a ratio of
at least 4:1. My experience with a Tracker (I'm a
male) was pleasant, but I found it did not satisfy my
wants, and needs. Actually with all due respect to
the Tracker, it really isn't intended for serious
off-road driving. Yes it does have modest off-road
capabilities, but it's more of a "all
weather" vehicle, then a "all terrain"
vehicle. But then again, most people who buy a
Tracker will probably never or hardly ever go off
road any way. For them, the 4 wheel drive will only
be used in the winter if at all. My model had manual
locking hubs, the auto hubs are an extra option.
|
Is most definitely not for
everyone, I'm referring to the Wranglers of course.
But if you are bitten by the Jeep bug, the only cure
is to get a Jeep! The Jeep is intended for people who
demand more out of their vehicle. It satisfies every
aspect of adventure, ride, and recreation. You can
drive it completely stock and be better off then any
other (stock) 4-wheel vehicle. No other vehicle comes
as complete right out of the box! Or you can build up
as much or as little as you want. You can immediately
go off road with your Jeep completely stock and be
amazed at it's capabilities! With a few mods, you can
even go rock climbing. Operating the 4 wheel drive is
very simple and straight forward. You can switch to
4H on the fly at any legal speed! To switch to 4L you
must switch to neutral and coast at 3 to 5 miles per
hour before switching to 4L. It's all automatic and
simple. No manual hubs, no stopping, or parking, or
reversing. Plus it's a Jeep! People will look at you
with respect. Drivers of every pick up truck will
watch you drive by wishing they had a Jeep. What can
I say, it's a Jeep Thing, you either understand, or
you don't.
|
The Tracker definitely has
it's admirer's and fans. However it is not even close
to a Jeep. It's predecessor the Suzuki Samurai was a
closer approach to a Jeep, and even earned the
respect of many Jeepers and off roaders. The Samurai
was fashioned after a jeep, but smaller. It's doors
could be removed, and it's windshield could be folded
down, and it could be modified to do some serious off
roading including rock climbing! Despite it's many
good points it never sold very well. Perhaps it was
it's high price tag, or poor marketing, most likely
both. Suzuki finally stopped making them, and
replaced them with the stripped down Sidekicks and
Trackers. Suzuki did the right thing from a business
stand point. The Samurai couldn't compete with the
Jeep because it cost more then a Jeep, so why bother
buying one then when you could get the original, and
full size Jeep for less money. Now Suzuki is
targeting a different breed of car buyers with their
Sidekicks and Trackers. And it seems to be working
for them. At least Tracker sales are pretty good.
Surprisingly a 1999 Tracker still cost more money
then a 1999 Jeep! However, drive both cars off the
lot and see which vehicle depreciates in value more.
The Tracker depreciates more and keeps depreciating
more at a very fast rate. The Jeep will hold it's
value very well.
One final observation I'd
like to make. I see a lot of Trackers in my area. But
the only Tracker I ever seen with it's convertible
top off was mine! I can tell you that it was 10 times
easier and faster to remove and put up my Tracker's
top then my Bestop on my TJ! So why are all the
Trackers driving around with their tops on in
beautiful sunny warm summer days? Beats me. Every
chance I got I took my Trackers top off. Even now
with my Jeep which takes me 5 times longer to remove
and put back, I drive with my top off my TJ too! The
only thing I can think of is that this further
signifies yet another primary difference between
Trackers and Jeeps, and that's the drivers. And if by
chance you should run in to a Tracker with their top
off, maybe we should be waving to them too, as they
could be Jeepers soon!
|