On three separate occasions the Tech Bench Elmers' have conducted two meter wavelength band antenna tests on a dry lakebed in the Mojave desert. These antenna tests were conducted in a scientifically controlled manner and on each separate occasion cross confirmed the results of the earlier tests. These tests were also arranged such that the radiation angle of the antennas under test could be assessed not only for their performance on the horizon but, also at an elevated angle. These tests were conducted on the dates of Nov. 26-28 1993, May 28, and 29th of 1994, and May 1995. The measured results of these first three tests are chronologically listed below. All readings are in -dbm (Decibels below 1 milliwatt).
1/4 Wavelength Ground Plane fabricated by WA6BFH 29.50 Dbm
1/2 Wavelength aluminum "J" fabricated by WA6BFH 30.25 Dbm
1/2 Wavelength Stainless Steel "J" by KD6IES 29.00 Dbm
1/2 Wave over 1/2 Wave "J" by KD6IES 29.25 Dbm
Hustler G6144B commercial collinear omni 25.75 Dbm
Base matched 1/2 Wave omni by KC6PNY 28.75 Dbm
M-Squared 7 element Yagi-Uda beam 19.00 Dbm
6 element Yagi-Uda antenna fabricated by KD6ZCN 20.50 Dbm
Mobile Antennas tested
Larson Mfr. 5/8 Wave omni on automobile rooftop 28.50 Dbm
Diamond Mfr. 144/440 MHz. (tested on 144 MHz.) 29.75 Dbm
1/4 Wave "Home-brew" omni fabricated by KC6PNY 29.75 Dbm
MFJ Mfr. 1/4 Wave omni provided by KD6JNB 30.25 Dbm
The above listed antennas were tested in Nov. 1993. A summary comparison follows the accumulated data.
The below antenna test results were taken or measured at two separate signal data received sites. Site A was at an elevated location at the top of Fremont Peak. Site B was located on the same horizon elevation (2680 Feet above sea level) as the antennas under test.
Site A Site B 1/4 Wave Gnd. Plane by BFH (Same as in Nov. '93 test) -26.0 Dbm -51.5 Dbm 1/2 Wave Alum. "J" by BFH (Same as in Nov. '93 test) -27.5 Dbm -52.0 Dbm Copper 1/2 Wave "J" by BFH -27.0 Dbm -51.2 Dbm Two 4 Element KLM Yagi's phased (one beam skewed) -17.0 Dbm -42.0 Dbm
Let us now observe and compare the test result analysis of the first two tests. Similar comparisons can also be made to the third test.
Result analysis can be made by subtracting the decibel gain value of one antenna compared to another. One example shows that by subtracting the - Dbm value of the M-Squared 7 element Yagi from the 1/2 wavelength aluminum "J" antenna we observe the following mathematical result, 30.25 - 19.00 = 11.25 Db's. Eleven decibels is a realistic gain figure for the beam antenna as compared to the end-fed "J" dipole.
If we similarly compare the 1/2 wave "J" to the Hustler collinear omni our result is observed as follows. 30.25 - 25.75 = 4.5 Db's. Keep in mind that the only data results that could be recovered from the first test of Nov. '93 were at the elevated Fremont Peak site. No data could be received from the horizon site. On the horizon a theoretical gain figure of 6 decibels over a dipole should be observed, at an elevated location this would be somewhat less, such as the 4 1/2 Db's observed. A 1/4 wavelength Ground Plane should display a higher angle of radiation than the dipole. If we compare the 1\2 wavelength "J" dipole to the Ground Plane the result is 30.25 - 29.5 = 0.75 or 3/4's of a decibel, almost 1 Db better than the dipole when observed from the elevated angle. A further point of interest showed that Copper constructed soldered "J" antennas proved to be better efficient having less resistive feedpoint loss than the Aluminum constructed "J's" which were bolted together.
On the second test of May '94 a comparison of the Aluminum and Copper "J's" showed a mathematical difference of 0.8 decibels (52.0 - 51.2 = 0.8). Almost 1 db better than the bolted antenna. When comparing the performance of the Copper J to the Ground Plane as observed from the elevated site, we see a 1 Db difference at the higher elevation angle from the Ground Plane (27.0 - 26.0 = 1.0).
Cliff KD6AUN and Matt KE6ALM organized this test series and the results are listed below. The test data was taken by a different procedural method than the earlier tests. In this test the receiver sites inserted appropriate amounts of signal attenuation to match readings against the reference antenna listed. Receive site personnel were only aware of the first time the reference antenna was used! Note the consistency of the average signal difference between the elevated and horizon level receiver sites!
Antenna description and construction Horizon Elevated Difference Reference Copper J by KE6ALM 44db 51db 7db 1/2 wave over 1/2 wave J by KO6JH 47db 52db 5db Ref. J by KE6ALM 43db 49.5db 6.5db Ref. J KE6ALM (mount straightened) 44db 49.5db 5.5db 1/2 over 1/2 wave J (top 1/2 removed, 43db 50db 7db Q-Line match re-adjusted) 1/2 wave J by KD6IES 44db 50db 6db Top loaded (Cap. hat) 5/8 wave by KN6VR 38.5db 44.5db 6db DDRR by KD6IES 12db 34db 22db DDRR cross polarized directed at Hor. site 28db 33db 5db DDRR same Pol. aimed between sites 30db 30db 0db DDRR same polarity aimed at elevated site 30db 22db 7or8db Reading at elevated site was plus or minus 1db Roll up J by KO6JH 44db 47db 5db Ref. J by KE6ALM 44db 49db 5db 4 Ele. Cubicle Quad by KO6JH Above pointed at Horizon site_ _ _ _ _ _ _ 51db 34db 17db Above pointed at Elevated site 16to19db 49db 40to44 Above aimed between both sites 37db 33db 4db Above aimed 180 degrees to Horizon site 36db 51db 15db Above aimed 180 degrees to Elev. site 47db 52db 5db 1/4 wave Mag. mount by Valor 36db 41db 5db Above Ant. while monitored on Bird 43 36 db 42db 6db 5/8 wave by Radio Shack 37db 44db 5db This antenna displayed reactive fluctuations 1/4 wave Mag. mount by KO6KS 37db 44db 7db 2M/70CM/23CM by Diamond 37db 44db 7db 2M/70CM by Diamond 38db 44db 6db Ref. J by KE6ALM 42db 47.5 5.5db 1/2 wave "duck" by "MFJ" 36.5db 43db 6.5db Icom FA-3BA Tri-bander 24db 32db 8db HTX-202 Hand held 31db 39.5db 8.5db Super Slender SH-5 by Comet 39db 39db 0db Miracle Baby CH-32 by: Comet 5db 14db 9db 2M/70CM by Larson 20db 29.5db 9.5db Above has 5 inch whip and is 7 in. overall