Joseph the Dream Interpreter

By David Epstein

June 25, 2001

 

We witness the first examples of Joseph’s dream interpretation abilities in Chapter 39. The setting is the Pharaoh’s prison where Joseph was imprisoned. The Pharaoh’s disgraced officers had dreams that were troubling to them. They are ‘sad’ because there is nobody to interpret their dreams. Oh, the poor saps!

 

Joseph replies in verse 8, “Do not interpretations belong to God?” This is a profound response. Nevertheless, Joseph listens to their dreams and gives his interpretation. Two possible viewpoints emerge with respect to his response:

  1. Joseph recognizes that God is the ultimate dream interpreter, yet he still goes ahead and interprets the dreams. This could show some type of disrespect of God’s authority.
  2. Joseph has been blessed with a God-given ability and utilizes it within the context of a deep-rooted respect for his God. I tend to favor this second viewpoint (interpretation?!).

 

Let’s return to the dreams! The chief butler (one of the officers) has a dream where he sees a vine with three branches. They blossomed with clusters of grapes. The butler takes the grapes and presses them into Pharaoh’s cup, then gives the cup to the Pharaoh. Joseph then gives his interpretation: the three branches represent three separate days. Within three days, the Pharaoh will restore the butler to his former office. The butler will give the Pharaoh his cup.

 

In verses 14-15, Joseph pleads with the butler to put in a kind word to the Pharaoh for him. He desperately wants to get out of prison. This is a natural response; yet notice that Joseph did not withhold the dream interpretation until he received an assurance from the butler that he would persuade the Pharaoh to release him from incarceration. This shows yet another dimension of his innate virtuosity.

 

The dream interpretation itself is pretty astute. Notice the butler doesn’t differentiate between the three branches. If he did, then perhaps it could have been interpreted as three separate pathways to choose from. Joseph is very perceptive to instead focus upon the ‘blossoming’ aspect of the dream . The three branches are taken as a totality ( this type of insightfulness is at the core of problem solving) . It is the offspring of those branches, the grapes, which represent his return to his former prestige.

 

The chief baker also had a dream. He dreamt that there were three baskets of white bread stacked atop his head. The top basket contained baked food for the Pharaoh, but birds ate from it. Once again, Joseph is not tempted by a popular interpretation, for one could easily visualize the three-stacked baskets as a representation of some type of hierarchy, with the highest element being a "source of nourishment". Instead, Joseph again insightfully considers the three elements - the baskets - as a totality, the passage of three days! He insists that the dream represents the baker’s death. The Pharaoh will hang him from a tree and the birds shall eat his flesh!

 

In verses 22-23 of Chapter 40, we see that Joseph’s dream interpretations are in fact prophecies. In three days, the butler is restored back to his office of chief butler, and the baker is hanged. The only aspect of this story that wasn’t realized is the butler’s neglect, for he did not remember to advocate for Joseph’s release. This implies that Joseph has the ability to predict other people’s fates as they appear in their own dreams, but not about his own fate as he actually verbalized it in reality.

 

The setting then shifts to the bank of a river where the Pharaoh has a dream involving the number seven. First, he dreams of seven kine (cows?) that came out of the river. Seven other kine emerged from the river. Even though they were “ill-favored”, they devoured the well-favored & fat kine. The Pharaoh had a second dream where he dreamt that seven ears of good corn grew on a stalk. Seven thin ears sprung up as well, from the Eastern winds, and devoured the good ears of corn. When the Pharaoh awoke, he summoned all of the magicians of Egypt, but none could interpret his dreams.

 

Well, the chief butler who neglected to return the favor to Joseph comes to the ‘rescue’. He tells the Pharaoh about Joseph’s clairvoyance. At that point, he summons Joseph to appear before him. The Pharaoh tells him that he’s heard of his abilities, but Joseph claims that he is merely the vehicle for God’s voice. (Chapter 41, verse 16: And Joseph answered Pharaoh: “It is not in me; God will give Pharaoh an answer of peace.”). So the Pharaoh explains his dreams to Joseph.

 

Joseph replies that the two dreams are really one. He claims that it’s a declaration of God’s plan for the Pharaoh. The seven good kine and ears represent seven years of plentitude. The seven bad kine and ears that subsequently emerged also represent seven years, but seven years of famine. Here again, the dream entities symbolize the passage of time. Joseph explains that the same dream occurs twice as a sign to the Pharaoh that the plentitude will never be realized because the famine will be very severe. He encourages the Pharaoh to send out a wise man throughout the land of Egypt, appoint overseers of the land, collect food grown & harvested during the seven good years (about a fifth of the food), and store it in the cities for use during the seven years of famine.

 

The Pharaoh took Joseph’s words to heart. In fact, he made Joseph the overseer!   He gives him a “signet ring”, clothed him in fine linen, and placed a gold chain around his neck. Then he sends him off in a chariot, gives him the name Zaphenathpaneah, and hand picks a wife for him.

 

I vaguely remember reading about a similar practice of the Egyptians. Apparently, they stored some of the food harvested from the fields for times when the banks of the Nile overflowed and flooded the plains. If so, then Joseph’s “dream interpretation” could have been stolen from an actual Egyptian practice. In fact, all of Joseph’s interpretations could easily have been superimposed folklore to present a different picture of reality. What if the story of Joseph is told by a third party with a vested interest to amplify Joseph’s abilities? That would be very easy to perform, particularly after the fact. Hence, it would factually be nothing more that the recording of historical realities with the alleged “dream interpretations” grafted onto the story. Nevertheless, without any evidence to support this hypothesis, it is mere cynical speculation. I’ll stay clear of that for now.

 

I’ll conclude this piece with a nod to Joseph the prognosticator, for indeed he did predict the famine that was to come to Egypt. And indeed he did collect food throughout the land to store for that “rainy famine day”! I’ll leave it for another day to discuss the dynamics of that seven-year period.

 

1