Gods and Monsters

Reviewed by: CalGal

April 24, 1999

Return

I resisted seeing Gods and Monsters for quite some time because I knew McKellan's performance of James Whale, openly gay director of the first two Frankenstein movies, perfectly captures a brave, witty, and elegant man. And I knew that this wonderful man would kill himself during the movie. A dilemma, for someone who always becomes unreasonably attached to movie characters.

But I finally toughed it out back in late February, and was overcome--not for the reason I expected, but because Gods and Monsters portrays something that I am irresistibly drawn to: the perfect death. Death when the only choice left is to decide when to leave and then discover the perfect moment to leave, usually after being given an unexpected gift. The art is to make the moment the *most* perfect, to tie the gift in believably, yet unexpectedly, to prior choices or actions of the one who dies--to make the moment and the gift appear from nowhere, yet tie everything together. I come unglued at such moments. Perfect deaths happen very rarely in movies and only slightly more often in books. (My first, and still favorite, instance of it is in a book by Rosemary Sutcliffe, The Mark of the Horse Lord).

Because Gods and Monsters provides James Whale with a perfect death (at least by my standards), and because this resonates so strongly within me, I have trouble focusing on the details of the movie. The story is beautifully constructed to portray not only Whale's final days, but to reveal the key periods in his life in a believable fashion; the script is funny, wise, and extraordinarily touching. The two people who spend his last days with him--his housekeeper, Hannah, and his gardner, Clayton--are given generous, but never distracting, attention.

Due homage is given to the look and feel of the various times portrayed--the production and costume designs are magnificent. Details of the 30s lawn party, Whale's home, the WWI scenes, and even the nondescript bar where Clayton watches Bride of Frankenstein are meticulously and lovingly presented. For some reason I remember the colors of this movie vividly--the white of Whale's suits, the blaze of garden flowers, the vivid contrast of the bright daylight scenes with the muted, but never gloomy, evening events.

Enough has been said about McKellan that there is no need to add to it, save to mention that it is one of the finest performances of the decade. I enjoyed Redgrave, but the person who is not getting his due is Fraser, who I thought was remarkably effective in a very difficult role. His work in the pivotal scene is crucial to its credibility and he comes through beautifully--in large part because of the fine job he did in defining his character up to that moment.

A final note: I still tear up when I think about the word written on the back of the Frankenstein drawing. With the question mark.

 

1