1200. CalGal - 10/17/99 1:58:07
PM
Cellar,
In your interesting review The Resurrection of Joe Orton, you make a brief
aside that I realize isn't central to your piece:
In Lahr's thoroughly upper-middle-class, heterosexual hands,
Orton and Halliwell become a gay parody of straight bohemian
domesticity gone wrong. The ``discarded wife'' (Halliwell) takes
revenge on the ``promiscuity'' of the ``husband'' (Orton); though
the record suggests that Halliwell enjoyed all the boys Tangier
had to offer every bit as much as Orton did.
I have read at least two other reviewers (one is Ebert, I forget
who the other was) who interpret PUYE in the same way--Halliwell
was the "wife" with the dishwater hands who helped him
on the way up and then was discarded when Orton became famous.
This interests me because I saw the movie very differently--although
I have no idea what Lahr's intentions were.
I thought it was blindingly obvious that Halliwell was slowly
going insane; that Lorton loved him and was concerned for him--and,
at the end, afraid of him. If anything, Orton was captive to a
nutjob who he stayed with out of affection and loyalty.
I know nothing about Lahr and, for all I know, he did intend to
imply what you suggest. And I do see some hints of this--while
they were both shown with other men, Orton clearly had the
advantage of numbers. The "parallel" with Shawn's wife.
The fact that Halliwell was left out of gatherings.
But if this was his main intent, he miscalculated. The
performances of Oldham and Molina, the gentleness with which
Orton treats Halliwell, and the many scenes where Halliwell is
clearly portrayed as insane are far more powerful and--to me, at
any rate--convincingly demonstrate the true nature of their
relationship and the cause of Orton's death.
1201. Cellar Door - 10/17/99 6:35:02
PM
The movie came off a good deal better than the book, despite the
miscasting of Molina (Halliwell was Orton's height and weight and
even looked enough like him to pass as a relation.) My main
objection is to Lahr, and the purchase he has made on Orton's
life and legacy. He's turned Orton's death into the Very Meaning
of his art -- rather than that which brought artistic production
to an end. I am extremely happy that the Chronicle offered me
this opportunity to speak about Orton and continue the project
begun by Simon Shepherd in his excellent if eccentric "Because
We're Queers" (Gay Men's Press, 1989) of de-Lahr-izing him.
If I can encourage one person to read "Between Us Girls"
I'll be happy.