Don't Look Now

Reviewed by: T.Tallis

December 7, 1998

Return

I took in a screening of a positively sparkling new print of Nic Roeg's 1973 "Don't Look Now" this evening. Almost all of Roeg's 70s output is essential (although "Walkabout", while still fascinating, seems a bit dated now, and he hasn't done anything worth a shit since the early 80s "Insignificance"/"Eureka" double-whammy), and "Dont Look Now" singlehandedly explains why. Roeg's films at their best never exist on a linear plane, instead embracing the structure of a shattered glass run through a projector in reverse, so the various shards can spring off the ground and coelesce (it's no accident that in the opening scene of this picture Julie Christie is reading a book called "The Fragile Geometry of Matter in Space"..."Fragile Geometry", incidentally, being the title of Joseph Lanz' later bio/analysis of Roeg. He takes an almost alchemical approach to his editing in his best films (look at the stomach-pump sequence from his neglected "Bad Timing", the murder sequence from "Eureka", or Rip Torn having sex with his students while David Bowie has an extra-terrestrial ephiphany watching Kabuki in "The Man Who Fell To Earth" for details), and the near Moebius-strip structure of "Don't Look Now" manages to solidly and effectively extend this skill over an entire 110 minute film, rather than a few isolated sequences. Christie and Donald Sutherland play the parents of a drowned daughter (the film is based on a Du Maurier story) who relocate to Venice to escape their grief. Sutherland immerses himself in his work, while Christie develops a relationship with a pair of mysterious English sisters, one of whom claims to be psychic and has visions of the dead girl, while Sutherland has similar, more physically tangible visions, which serve to override and belittle Christie's new "spiritual" link to replacing what they'd lost. Roeg (wisely) abandons the plot in favor of creating a psychological study based on location and atmosphere. The Venice of this film is a hopelessly desolate, disorienting, monochromatic maze teeming with corpses and refuse (the new print, which could have from the looks of it been struck earlier this morning, gave an almost organic malevolence to the film that the bleached and choppy video prints I'd previously seen have obscured). Ironic that the film's most notorious sequence is an incredibly tender portrayal of domestic intimacy (Sutherland and Christie's unusually graphic lovemaking intercut with their detatched and offhanded dressing for dinner), while every frame of the rest of the picture is positively saturated with grief, paranoia, mistrust and alienation. By the time Roeg (in a shockingly cold move) trots out the slate-white arbitrary horror of the climax, you've already been through the patient wringer (though the ending, for me, never fails to pack a punch, rather garishly in the dazzling arterial spurt of this new print). The picture has aged remarkably well, and print notwithstanding, it's a treat to see Roeg's inimitable band-aid shaped compositions on the pre-formatted wider-screen. If this print comes through YourTown, by all means plop down the cash. If not, the bleached and choppy video print should get the point across, though to a considerably dulling effect.

 

1