Lolita

Reviewed by: T.Tallis

October 19, 1998

Return

Given that director Adrian Lyne, with previous films like "Fatal Attraction", "Indecent Proposal" and the salacious yuppie/whore fantasies in "9 1/2 Weeks", has probably done more inherent damage to popular American sexual mores than anyone I can think of right off, all the dreary and predictable flap over his rather similar production of "Lolita" seems like much ado about not much, really. Good thing for him that American viewers rarely resist the curiosity pull of controversy, no matter how fabricated, as this film doesn't have much going for it on its own merits. Any successful film adaptation of Nabokov is probably impossible and not worth discussing in depth, but comparisons between this production and the misfired Kubrick translation are just as inevitable. While this film doesn't improve on the previous film's failings much, it does serve as a kind of antithesis; where Kubrick gravitated towards the comedic Lyne portentiously slavers over the morose and tragic. In fact, Lyne's handling is so stately, careful and stultifyingly safe that some of Kubrick's mistakes seem almost necessary...at least his film had some semblance of energy. Dominique Swain in the title role does what she can to inject some vital complexity into the film and succeeds at points, but the film, perhaps intimated by itself, ultimately reduces her to a simple victim (a questionable tack considering the source). Jeremy Irons as Humbert (Irons seems to be getting some practice in this kind of role..."Stealing Beauty", anyone?) surprisingly conveys withered resignation rather than the wracked desperation one might expect, while Melanie Griffith can't seem to decide whether Charlotte Haze is a drag-queen fond of Nabokov or a drag-queen with a serious drug problem. And then there's the Quilty Dilemma. Peter Sellers in Kubrick's version was entertaining, but hugely incongruous and overplayed. By contrast, Frank Langella here is a one-note malevolent cipher whose scenes are equally incongruous with the elegiac tone the rest of the film attempts (mostly encouraged by Ennio Morricone's customary florid score)...one is lit by an absurdly powerful bug-zapper, the other a frenzy of gore, flopping genitals and incomprehensible editing (probably an attempt to wake up the audience). Lyne gives other scenes like-minded overkill (Humbert's increasing paranoia, for example, is snatched from Irons and replaced by lens-shifting hallucination sequences), but overall drains anything potentially shocking or inherently ironic from his material, settling instead for a two-dimensionally inoffensive, antiseptic and terminally dull costume drama.

 

1