Welcome
to the SiliconValley News & Reviews!
Hardware Reviews
Central Processing Unit - CPU
CNET's
Top 10 Processors
The CPU, or central processing unit (often just called
a processor) is the component most rapidly being developed. The big
chip makers are constantly trying to outdo each other. Some people
call the computer case and contents the CPU, which is incorrect. It's
one of those things that lets a tech know that you have no idea what
you're talking about.
- AMD -
Giving Intel a run for their money. They are the leaders in
integer math, but with the 3D revolution you need floating point.
D'oh! The new Athlon K7 looks like it could take down the Pentium
III. If you have the money, the Athlon K7 is the way to go.
Cyrix-
Bye bye. Let this be a lesson. Put the megahertz on the chip, not
some weird rating. Despite their poor reputation, they were the
performance leader. Their 133 MHz chip could outperform Intel or
AMD's 133 MHz chip, except they tried to deceive the public,
essentially. They marked their chips with a PR rating, like PR166
or PR200... for a chip that doesn't run at that speed and doesn't
outperform the competitors chips that run at that speed. Stupid.
Really stupid. They had stability and compatibility issues, too.
Intel -
The Pentium II was initially released with 66 MHz bus speed, then
followed with Pentium IIs that ran at 100 MHz bus speed. AMD was
taking a large part of the affordable CPU market, since the Pentium
II was such an expensive part. To remedy this, Intel released the
Celeron processor. The original Celerons were not well received.
They had no L2 cache, and ran at 66 MHz bus speed. So, playing
catch-up again, they released the new Celerons, the Mendocino-core
300A and 333, still at 66 MHz bus, but with 128k L2 cache. Although
considerably less L2 cache than the Pentium II, the L2 cache in the
Mendocino Celerons ran at the full speed of the CPU core because the
L2 cache was on the same piece of silicon. Although the Pentium II
L2 cache was of much higher capacity, it ran at half the bus speed.
As it turns out, the speed of the L2 cache had a lot to do with
performance. Then someone figured out that, although the multiplier
for the Celeron was locked, all you had to do to unlock the bus
speed setting for a slot one CPU was to block one contact on the
edge connector. So, the 300A normally ran at 300 MHz, 66 X 4.5, but
many users were getting it up to 450 MHz! Then Abit and Asus
released motherboards that could do this trick without physically
blocking that contact, and allowed users to chamge all manner of CPU
settings in the BIOS, without ever having to touch a jumper. With
each core revision the overclocks became more stable. More and more
users were getting the 333 to run at 500 MHz. Some 300A owners got
theirs to 504 MHz. The Celeron was rapidly becoming the overclockers'
dream chip. The Celeron 400 made for very easy overclocks, having
already been tested at a high clock speed in the first place, and
making nice steps with each bus speed setting. 75 MHz bus makes it a
450 MHz CPU. 83 MHz bus makes it a 500 MHz CPU.
Then comes the Pentium III. The
new streaming feature, when supported by a graphics card, can
supposedly increase 3D performance by a whopping 30%...
unfortunately, the new internal identification code in the Pentium
III triggers 30% more paranoid reactions. It's a whole new issue to
be debated. I won't take a stance on it right now. I think a bigger
issue with the Pentium III would be that it costs more than an AMD
K7 Athlon that outperforms it.
This is really the area where Tom's site got famous,
so I'll refer you to some of his most interesting articles on CPUs.
Athlon Kicks the Crap Out of Pentium III?!
Athlon
VS. Pentium III Office Benchmarks
Athlon
VS. Pentium III 3D Game Benchmarks
Athlon
VS. Pentium III 3D Application Benchmarks
Intel Celeron CPU offers great performance via overclocking
The benchmarks that started it all (and why Pentium II and Celeron are
better than an AMD K6-2 where it counts)...
3D
game performance
3D
application performance
How to run any Slot One Celeron at whatever bus speed your motherboard
allows (or How
to Get All 66 MHz Slot 1 CPUs Running 100 MHz)
AnandTech's Battle
at 500 MHz
AMD
Athlon VS. Intel Pentium III VS. Intel Celeron - Office Performance
AMD
Athlon VS. Intel Pentium III VS. Intel Celeron - Gaming Performance
AMD
Athlon VS. Intel Pentium III VS. Intel Celeron - Windows NT
Performance
Yep, Athlon is kicking Intel's ass.
Current Typical Pricing
(You don't always get what you pay for.)
Remember that Intel Celeron processors are highly likely to
overclock to over 400 MHz. The Celeron 400 is virtually guaranteed to
overclock to 450 MHz, and likely to reach 500 MHz.
Intel |
Pentium MMX |
233 MHz |
$30 |
Intel |
Pentium II |
300 MHz |
$130 |
Intel |
Pentium II Celeron 300A
Slot One |
300 MHz |
$70 |
Intel |
Pentium II Celeron 300A
PPGA |
300 MHz |
$55 |
AMD |
K6-2 |
300 MHz |
$30 |
Intel |
Pentium II |
333 MHz |
$175 |
Intel |
Pentium II Celeron
Slot One |
333 MHz |
$65 |
Intel |
Pentium II Celeron
PPGA |
333 MHz |
$45 |
AMD |
K6-2 |
333 MHz |
$30 |
Intel |
Pentium II |
400 MHz |
$135 |
Intel |
Pentium II Celeron
Slot One |
400 MHz |
$85 |
Intel |
Pentium II Celeron PPGA |
400 MHz |
$50 |
AMD |
K6-2 |
400 MHz |
$40 |
AMD |
K6-3 |
400 MHz |
$100 |
Intel |
Pentium II |
450 MHz |
$165 |
Intel |
Pentium III |
450 MHz |
$175 |
AMD |
K6-2 |
450 MHz |
$50 |
AMD |
K6-3 |
450 MHz |
$140 |
Intel |
Pentium II Celeron PPGA |
500 MHz |
$135 |
Intel |
Pentium III |
500 MHz |
$230 |
AMD |
K7 Athlon |
500 MHz |
$220 |
Intel |
Pentium III |
550 MHz |
$375 |
AMD |
K7 Athlon |
550 MHz |
$340 |
Intel |
Pentium III |
600 MHz |
$585 |
Intel |
Pentium III 600B |
600 MHz |
$650 |
AMD |
K7 Athlon |
600 MHz |
$500 |
AMD |
K7 Athlon |
650 MHz |
$680 |
|