Visions in the Stone

by Slider




As a long-time CUer, I would like to offer the following response to Leonard, Brandon, and various other writers and prognosticators, who continue to regale and entertain with their observations of CUSeeMe, the problems they've encountered with "exposed genitalia", their skepticism as to whether relationships on CU can be anything more than "virtual", and whether all relationships forged on CU can be nothing more than "fantasy"....

The Internet has been described as the eventual planetary repository and memory bank for the sum total of all human knowledge and experience. If that is so, then CUSeeMe, and other video-conferencing applications, will become its visual mirror and expression of all that we are. For better or worse. It will allow us to reach out and communicate visually, textually and eventually aurally, with whomever we wish across the planet instantaneously. In an age of increasing complexity and impersonalization, there is a comfort in the friendships and bonds that are forged on here. However, the shield of anonymity that the Internet provides to its users allows for a different type of interaction than one would normally encounter off-line. Consequently, in many instances, this shield provides the opportunity for some users to indulge their exhibitionist or voyeuristic compulsions.

Recently I had the opportunity to participate in what I considered a truly extraordinary CU event. A woman that I had known for several years had recently gotten onto the Net. She and her family were originally from Estonia. Her parents had moved to North America when she was a child. Health problems had prevented her parents from ever returning to Estonia. She had begun to strike up an email exchange with a person who lived in a town several miles from the village where her parents had lived, and where her grandparents still lived. After several discussions with her about the Net, I mentioned that I had been using CUSeeMe for several years, and explained to her the basic concepts of video conferencing. Over the next few weeks she downloaded and installed the software, and purchased a cam. After much prodding and cajoling she convinced her friend in Estonia to do the same thing. The camera had to be specially ordered and took several weeks to arrive. Finally they were both connected and had their first dc. After they became familiar with the workings of CU, they arranged a very special day. Her friend in Estonia arranged to have my friends grandparents come to her home on a Saturday night at 7PM local time. Which would be 11AM EST. And so, at 11AM she logged on with her father and mother in the room. She dc'd with her friend in Estonia. And for the first time in over 30 years her father was able to SEE his parents. The man was simply overwhelmed by it. And with tears streaming down his face he waved and smiled at them from over 2,000 miles away. The dc lasted several hours. It's impossible to describe the emotion that went through the room that day. Sadly, just four days later, her grandfather passed away. This event didn't occur on a ref. It wasn't publicized or even discussed in public. It occured when two netizens utilized this incredible technology to allow a man from Estonia to see his father alive for the very last time.

And THAT, Leonard and Brandon, is the ESSENCE of CUSeeMe. The ability for people to SEE and interact with one another live and instantaneously no matter how great the distance between them. To dismiss CUSeeMe, and other video conferencing programs, as simply the lair of the exhibitionist or sexual deviant is to dismiss the true essence of this incredible technology. I would suggest that instead of cruising the various sex refs, that you may want to make a gift of the software and camera to a distant relative whom you haven't seen in ages. For in the final analysis, the power and versatility of this technology allows the user to utilize it in any way they deem fitting. For better or worse, these visions transmitted thru the silicon stone reflect only what they see.

Personally, I have experienced the full range of emotions on CU. The shared laughter of good friends. The loss and sadness of the death of others. I have never considered the people I meet on CU to be "virtual" friends. I've never thought of them as any less "real" than my off-line friends. The loss of my dear CU friend Kerry hurt just as much. In my experience, the sole determining factor as to whether a relationship forged on CU is "virtual" or somehow less "real", is the honesty of the participants. But the same can be said of any venue, on-line or off-line, where people are meeting for the first time.

What CU is cannot easily be defined, it exists within the beauty of its own atmosphere. An atmosphere suffused with chat that consists of the unending poetry of consciousness. Whether these visions are self-serving illusion or mirage, can not be determined by a cursory scan of sex refs, and a "sit back and entertain me" attitude.

September 2000


1