While on the internet I've been exposed to a
good number of highly intelligent literary discussions. But
they've also been full of confused thinking, generally because of
what I consider to be their participants' taxonomical ignorance
and/or indifference. This has annoyed me, finally, into the
following Laying-Down of the Law Concerning the Classification of
Literary Works.
I begin with Verbal Expression. At the simplest level, there are
two kinds: Oral Verbal Expression, or Speech, and Written Verbal
Expression, or Writing. I divide the former into Declamation and
Stagework, depending on the degree of physical action involved in its presentation. Declamation is that which, for practical purposes, is all speech; stagework that whose effect is seriously reduced if not acted out. Generally, declamation is performed by a single voice, stagework by more than one, but neither is an absolute requirement. As far as I can tell, there is no need for any parallel division of writing.
The Three Main Varieties of Verbal Expression
All verbal expression, oral or written, can be split into three
main varieties, according to its purpose:
.......... Literature, or the use of words (predominantly) in the pursuit of Beauty
.......... Informrature, or the use of words (predominantly) in the pursuit of Truth .......... Advocature, or the use of words (predominantly) in the pursuit of Goodness (or, more specifically, the Moral Good)
Prose and Poetry
Literature (whether oral or written) divides naturally into prose
and poetry. I unradically believe that what most distinguishes poetry from prose is that poetry is intended to be read slowly, read into rather than through: connotations, sounds, rhythms, flesh, rather than an asensual focus on denotation only. I thus define it as literature that contains significant numbers of "flow-breaks." The flow-break has two main purposes: (1) to tell the aesthcipient that he is involved with poetry and should prepare his mind accordingly; and (2) to retard the aesthcipient's progress through the work so that he experiences it with maximal sensual participation.
Prose is simply literature that is not poetry. The Flow-Break
I recognize four kinds of flow-breaks, but I'm sure others will
find more. My four are: (1) the orthodox line-break, (2) the variable indentation,
(3) the interior line-gap, and (4) the intra-syllabic line-break.
Any flow-break can be empty or filled--with asterisks, say, or
any other kind of symbol (or spoken sound) without a clear
punctuational or other semantic use.
The Orthodox Line-Break
The line-break is simply (and conventionally) any space or other
block of asemantic fill that prevents a line from reaching some
pre-set (loosely or precisely defined), repeating margin to the right.
The Variable Indentation
The variable indentation is any space or other block of asemantic fill that prevents a line from starting at some pre-set (loosely or precisely defined), repeating margin to the left. It is the same as a line-break except at the opposite end of a line.
The Interior Line-Gap In written poetry, an interior line-gap is simply a block of two or more spaces or other asemantic matter within a line, spoken or written.
In oral poetry, interior line-gaps--and the other flow-breaks, as well--are pauses keeping the speaker from continuing to
some pre-set stopping or starting point, such as a
period, or the capital letter at the beginning of a sentence.
The Intra-Syllabic Line-Break
The third of my "flow-breaks," the intra-syllabic line-break,
is confined to written poetry. Like the orthodox line-break,
it occurs at the end of a line; unlike the latter,
however, it can end at a pre-set margin; it interrupts flow by
stopping a line in the middle of a syllable (generally but not
necessarily always, without a hyphen), as in the following sentence. My i
Prose contains flow-breaks, but they are few, and predictible:
the paragraphs of prose works generally begin and end with variable
indentations, for instance. And interior indentations
using dots are used in prose to indicate an ellipse. Poetry uses
the flow-break several magnitudes of order more frequently and
consequentially than prose does, though.
The Two Super-Genres It seems to me that there are two basic genres in literature: "Narrature," and "Evocature." Since by "narrature" I mean pretty much what is meant by "narrative," my coinage is probably superfluous. I'm retaining it for now for two reasons: (1) it fits my system of neologies by ending in "ture," and (2) I think it useful to distinguish narrative-as-story from narrative-as-that-which-contains-a-story.
I define narrative rigorously as more than just events. For me,
narrative consists only of those events that take place as some protagonist attempts to reach a goal--in a manner that makes the attempt to reach the goal central to the aestheriencer. The latter qualification makes the definition vulnerable to subjectivity but I see no way around that. I believe the qualification necessary to distinguish a narrative about a plant's fight to reach sunlight, and a (literary) description of a plant's growth.
The latter would be a form of evocature. Evocature seeks to
evoke a mood, generally by presenting a scene or portraying a
character. Events might be part of the presentation, but
uncentrally. Lyric poetry is the principal kind of evocature but
there are also prose poems, and those stageworks whose aim is to
capture an era, or a locale, or whatever, rather than tell a
story.
The Twelve Major Sub-Rubrics of Verbal Expression It should be clear now that a literary work can be declamation, stagework or writing; prose or poetry; and narrature or evocature. There are thus twelve possible "major sub-rubrics" of literature:
..... 1. Narrational Literary Declamation in Prose--or, okay, Story-Telling
..... 2. Evocational Literary Declamation in Prose (i.e., the so-called "prose poem," declaimed), or Oral Prose Evocature
..... 3. Narrational Literary Declamation in Verse (note: I use "poetry" and "verse" interchangeably), or Oral Narrative Poetry
..... 4. Evocational Literary Declamation in Verse, or Oral Lyric Poetry
..... 5. Narrational Drama in Prose, or--because it's so dominant--just plain Drama
..... 6. Evocational Drama in Prose
..... 7. Narrational Drama in Verse, or Verse Drama
..... 8. Evocational Drama in Verse
..... 9. Narrational Literary Prose, or Prose Narrature (e.g., the
novel and short story; the essay, which almost qualifies, is
imformrature, not literature)
..... 10. Evocational Literary Prose (or plain Prose Evocature)
..... 11. Narrational Literary Poetry (or Narrative Poetry)
..... 12. Evocational Literary Poetry (or Lyric Poetry)
Each of these sub-rubrics contains species, and the species
contain sub-species and genres--notably tragedy, comedy and
melodrama in drama. I lack the space to treat these here, except
in poetry--not only because it's my specialty but because I
consider it the most taxonomically vexed of the main literary
forms.
The Two Major Species of Poetry
There are two major species of poetry in my poetics: livenorm poetry and burstnorm poetry
I break livenorm poetry into songmode poetry and plaintext poetry
Songmode Poetry
Songmode Poetry is traditional poetry, always adhering to some
auditorily-based pattern (i.e., to rhyme, alliteration, meter, or the
like) significantly more than it does not.
Plaintext Poetry
Plaintext Poetry is standard free verse--i.e., verse in which the use of meter, rhyme and the like is, for most readers, too minor for the verse to seem songmode poetry; it is distinguished from
the free verse used in burstnorm poetry in being textual only,
and in not rebelling against any significant rules of grammar or
spelling.
Burstnorm Poetry
Burstnorm Poetry is poetry that breaks significantly with the
norms of conventional grammar, orthography, logic and/or
expressive decorum.
There are three major kinds of burstnorm poetry:
..... (1) language poetry (poetry that significantly breaks the rules of grammar and/or spelling for expressive effect) (re-named 7 July 1998, then changed from "idiolinguistic poetry" to "language poetry" 24 May 2004)
..... (2) xenological poetry (poetry that breaks the rules of what
one might call the logic of the senses by juxtaposition of
incongruent imagery or the logic of narrational by jumping from
event to event in a seemingly arbitrary way)
..... (3) pluraesthetic poetry (poetry that significantly breaks
the conventions of expressive decorum--by mixing expressive
modalities: e.g., the verbal and the visual)
Language Poetry
There are two main kinds of language poetry:
..... (1) sprungrammar poetry, in which syntax and/or inflection are meddled with (most people understand language poetry as this kind of poetry)
..... (2) infra-verbal poetry, in which spelling is meddled with.
Xenological Poetry
There are three main kinds of xenological poetry:
..... (1) surrealistic poetry, in which incongruous images are
juxtaposed
..... (2) jump-cut poetry, in which narrational sequence is meddled with.
..... (3) non-representational poetry, in which the denotations of words are to be ignored as much as possible, with a resultant emphasis on their sounds and averbal relationships with one another (as, for instance, when one word is an anagram for another), and the like.
Pluraesthetic Poetry Pluraesthetic poetry has many sub-classes, among them:
..... (1) audio-textual poetry
............... (a) sound poetry (poetry containing auditory
elements that are fused with, and as expressively consequential
as, its words)
............... (b) auditorilly-enhanced poetry (poetry spoken in
a manner that increases its ability to please but does not
increase its core meaning; an example would be Dylan Thomas
giving a reading of "Fern Hill")
............... Textual Music is sometimes described as poetry
but is a form of music--music some of whose elements are textual
but none of whose elements are to any significant degree words,
or words whose meaning is pertinent to what the artwork is
saying. It and audio-textual literature together comprise audio-
textual art.
..... (2) visio-textual poetry
............... (a) visual poetry (poetry containing visual
elements that are as expressively consequential
as, its words)
............... (b) visually-enhanced poetry (poetry written in an
elegant calligraphy, for instance, or with letters that look like
trees or people or the like, as in illuminated manuscripts, or in
any manner that increases the work's ability to please but does
not increase its core meaning) ............... Textual Illumagery is sometimes described as poetry but is a form of illumagery--illumagery some of whose elements are textual but none of whose elements are to any significant degree words, or words whose meaning is pertinent to what the artwork is saying. It and visio-textual literature together comprise visio- textual art.
..... (3) mathematical poetry (poetry using mathematical symbols
that actually carries out mathematical operations as opposed to
poetry about mathematics or poetry that uses mathematical symbols
decoratively.
..... (4) flow-chart poetry (poetry that uses the symbols of
computer or other flow-charting in significantly expressive ways)
..... (5) performance poetry (poetry in which human physical
actions are fused with, and more or less as expressively as
important as, the poetry's verbal elements; it could be
considered kinetic poetry or a form of visual poetry except that
the human actor(s) involved are of major importance; it could
also be considered drama except that it is lyrical--i.e., without
a strong narrational element)
There are surely other forms of pluraesthetic poetry, and many
combinations of different varieties of pluraesthetic poetry.
When two or more varieties of it are combined, I term the result
"compound pluraesthetic poetry." If necessary I am more precise:
for example, I call some of my mathematical poems that are also
visual poems, "visio-mathematical poems." Pluraesthetic poems
can also be combined with idiolinguistic or surrealistic poems.
In that case, I call them "compound burstnorm poems," or more
exactly label them, if necessary.
At this juncture, we're still far from the final, most detailed level of
classification of poetry. There is, for instance, classification
by size, and by genre (or subject-matter); there are also the
many shapes of poems such as the sonnet. I believe I've covered
the most important classes of poetry, though. And there will be
time to get to the other levels of my taxonomy later.
|