HISTORY

--GENERAL
-- UPSETS
-- STATISTICS

DIRECTORY

  • HOME
  • INTRODUCTION
  • HISTORY
  • CEREMONIES
  • EXPO MAP
  • PAVILIONS
  • TRANSPORT
  • MISCELLANY
  • MEMORIES
  • GUESTBOOK:
  • SIGN
  • VIEW

  •  

     
     
     

    EMAIL


    International Participants
    Britain Antigua & Barbuda Dominica
    Grenada Montserrat St. Kitts/Nevis
    St. Lucia St. Vincent & the Grenadines Kenya
    Canada Senegal Saudi Arabia
    United States of America Peru Indonesia
    Australia France Cote d'Ivoire
    Spain Thailand Mexico
    China U.S.S.R Korea
    Italy West Germany Pakistan
    Czechoslovakia Japan Yugoslavia
    Switzerland Barbados Norway
    Romania The Philippines Cuba
    Belgium Costa Rica Singapore
    Brunei Darussalam Sri Lanka Hungary
    Fiji Western Samoa Cook Islands
    Tonga Vanuatu Papua new Guinea
    Solomon Islands Nauru Malaysia
    European Community United Nations Hong Kong

    Provinces and States
    British Columbia Quebec Ontario
    Alberta Saskatchewan Nova scotia
    Prince Edward Island Northwest Territories Yukon Territory
    Washington Oregon California

     Corporate Exhibits
    Air Canada B.C.T.V. Canadian Pacific
    VIA Rail American Express Canadian National
    General Motors of Canada Telecom Canada Pavilion of Promise

    Theme Exhibits
    Great Hall of Ramses II The Roundhouse Special Images Holography
    Million Dollar Gold Coin Expo Centre Folklife

    Rides
    For fear that the local summer fair (Pacific National Exhibition) would suffer from Expo, the Expo organizers decided not to host a Midway.  Instead,  they sporadically placed a few traditional rides introduced at World's fairs which included:
    Looping Starship Caraboo Logchute
    Scream Machine (rollercoaster) Children's Play Area
    1907 Philadelphia Toboggan Co. Carousel Minolta Space Tower

    So how does Vancouver Rate? 

    Expo 86 is considered a success story.   Despite a deficit of $311, 000, 000 (CAD) the British Columbian tax payer wouldhave been stuck with a much larger bill if the attendance had not almost doubled from the original projected number of 13.7 million.  The legacy structures themselves are worth well more than the deficit. 

    To date, Expo 86 can boast the second highest attendance of any world's fair within the last 30 years and the highest attendance record for a Specialized/Category 2 fair since New York's fair in 1939. 

    At 70 hectares (173 acres) Expo 86 was part of a movement to bring the more economical Specialized fairs to a higher standard.  The focus was shifted away from bombastic architecture such as towers and monuments toward more conservative structures that could be reused in the future. 

    Then there is the human factor.  Expo 86 is considered the pivotal point in time where the locals began to see Vancouver as a "world class" city.   Many people believe that the World's Fair helped put Vancouver on the map and civic pride hit a new high with the new-found recognition from around the world.
     
    Year CITY COUNTRY AREA
    (ACRES)
    AREA
    (Ha)
    # of
    International
    Participants
    Category Attendance
    1900 Paris France 297 120 58 UE 50 860 801
    1904 St. Louis USA 1235 500 60 UE 19 694 855
    1915 San Francisco USA 628 254 32 UE 19 000 000
    1933 Chicago USA 420 170 GE Cat. 2 22 317221
    1935 Brussels Belgium 375 152 30 GE Cat. 2 20 000 000
    1937 Paris France 260 105 44 GE Cat. 2 31 040 955
    1939 New York City USA 1235 500 33 GE Cat. 2 44 000 000
    (2 years)
    1958 Brussels Belgium 494 200 42 GE Cat. 1 41 454 412
    1962 Seattle USA 74 30 17 GE Cat. 2 9 000 000
    1964 New York City USA 646 NR 51 607 037
    (2 years)
    1967 Montreal Canada 62 GE Cat. 1 50 306 648
    1970 Osaka Japan 865 350 75 GE Cat. 1 64 218 770
    1974 Spokane USA 100 40.5 SE 4 800 000
    1975 Okinawa Japan 274 100 37 SE 3 485 750
    1982 Knoxville USA 74 30 16 SE 11 127 786
    1984 New Orleans USA 26 SE 7 335 279
    1985 Tsukuba Japan 247 100 111 SE 20 334 727
    1986 Vancouver Canada 173 70 54 SE 22 111 578
    1988 Brisbane Australia 98 40 30 SE 18 574 475
    1992 Seville Spain 538 215 108 UE 41 814 571
    1993 Taejon Korea 222 90 141 SE 14 000 000
    1998 Lisbon Portugal 123 50 146 SE 10 128 204
    2000 Hannover Germany 395 160 155 UE 18 100 000
    2005 Seto, Aichi Japan SE
    200? SE
    2010 Shanghai China UE

    World's Fair Categories 

    UE = Universal Exposition -- usually the largest fairs in terms of acreage and International participants.  But most historical fairs before the 1930s are generally considered Universal Expositions regardless of the size.  The earliest Universal Expositions were housed in one large building.  Since the turn of the 20th century a UE is most often recognized by participating countries designing and building their own pavilions.  Also, a UE usually runs for a minimum
    5 to six months.  The UE category was re-established in the early 1970s.

    SE = Specialized Exposition -- Smaller in acreage than a UE.  International participants are usually not requested to design their own pavilion, but rather, are given space in existing structures provided by the host country.

    GE = General Exposition --  Term given to all recognized fairs between the 30s and the early 70s.  The General Exposition could be either a category 1 (UA) or 2 (SA).  The term General Exposition was put in place to distinguish the difference between a World's Fair and a Horticultural or Agricultural fair. 

    Cat.  Category (1 and 2) -- The terms category 1 and category 2 can be interchanged with UE and SE, respectively.

    NR = Not Recognized by the Bureau of International Exhibitions (BIE).  In order to host a World's Fair, the host country/city must follow a procedure much like the bidding process for the Olympic Games. If that country/city wins the bid, they are recognized by the BIE and all the countries who belong to the organization. Some cities such as New York City in 1964 hosted a fair without the BIE's support, thus, it is not in the official record books.

    A and B Fairs are terms used primarily by the media.  The BIE does not use A or B to describe a World's Fair category. 

    Note that the number of International participants does not always equal the total number of pavilions.  Some fairs, such as Seattle 62, housed many countries in a few buildings.  Hannover 2000 did the same with nations that wished to participate but could not or did not want to go through the expense of designing and building a detached pavilion. 

    Additionally, corporate pavilions have become increasingly popular over the years.  In some fairs, corporate pavilions outnumbered National pavilions, but corporate pavilions are not counted in most official records.  The number of International participants tabulated in the table above only include nations.  It does not include corporate, religious or
    theme pavilions.
     

    1