April 18, 26 J.E.

 

This is a special report from the National Rant Warning Service. A major rant has been sighted in the northeast and is heading rapidly toward Youville. This rant has been reported to have strong opinions and a stream of thought clocked at 126 miles per hour. There have been reports of damage to narrow worldviews and unstable minds. If you are not what people would describe as “open minded”, place the boards back on your cognitive windows, close your eyes, and go to some other website.

 

SO there I was, at work, when a new revelation struck me like a lawn dart to the skull. I had briefly ranted before about how Presidents and other leaders are largely chosen on the basis of their physical presence rather than any kind of ideological affiliation (proof: the winning candidates are usually the tallest ones). Then I realized something else. When you look around, most middle-aged or older men are bald or balding. Sure, all of the Hollywood stars have their wigs, toupees, and hair transplants, but your average joe is a bit of a chrome dome. They also have spare tires.

 

Why, then, have we had VERY few bald presidents? I thought back, and I’ll be damned if I could think of more than a few who had failed to give their luxurious manes reason to stay attached to their heads. Eisenhower is the only truly aerodynamic commander-in-chief I can think of, except for Van Buren, but he was a one-termer anyway. Sure, Nixon was showing a few shiny spots, but he still had some cranial fur. You’ll also notice that they were all in pretty good shape. Taft was the only really fat ass we had, and that was back when it was good to be fat. I have no stats, but I would bet good money that the baldness rate of the Congress is far lower than the national average, too. Of course, a lot of them are probably faking it. The point is, we still insist on voting for leaders who show signs of physical youth and vigor. Hell, Clinton’s dalliances are probably a subconscious plus.

 

That brings me to that common lament that old chicks are discriminated against. Men become distinguished, the maxim goes, while chicks just become broads. That WOULD be true, if all men kept their hair and stayed strong and muscular. Women call US shallow! HA! Receding hairline is the male equivalent of sagging boobs (of course, some old guys actually DO develop sagging boobs), and a big gut is the same as a big ass, only more life threatening. The guy who stays in shape and keeps his hair is distinguished, just like the chick who retains her signs of youth. The fat bald slob in front of the television is typical, just like the obese sagging broad.

 

50 year-old Sigourney Weaver sure has held up. Woo-hoo!

 

BACK TO THE MENU

 

1