QUESTION: When I go through certain phases of various fears, is that connected with the subject you discussed here?
ANSWER: Yes, it is indeed. Fears are often a subterfuge to hide from the basic core of pain. They come into existence as a result of your evasion. In this work you have noticed that after certain progress the fears begin to vanish, and then you become aware of your pain. The fear is an inadvertent result of the evasion -- that was not chosen deliberately, of course. But all evasions must have more unpleasant results than the original core. Unpleasant as the original pain may be, once one accepts its truth, then it is much better, much easier, much more honest, and much more healthy to live with than the result of any evasion -- be it fear or anything else. Since fear vanishes only after it is faced, met, and come to terms with, then pain, which is the underlying core of it, has to be dealt with similarly.
QUESTION: In the process of my work, of late I occasionally feel the need to give love, and not only to receive. But this feeling goes away again. How can I learn to always feel the need to give?
ANSWER: My dear friend, it would be misleading to say that you learn it. This is something that you cannot learn by a voluntary act. If you should attempt it, then it amounts to a manipulation of your feelings, and this would be dishonest. If it is real, then it happens naturally and by itself. This will come more often -- and it will last longer and it will become stronger -- but only if you do not try to force it directly. The best way to get to this point of growth, of maturity, and of productive living is by observing your emotions. Note how they are still geared to the one-sided, childish desire to merely receive. The more you observe yourself objectively, the more you will find the underlying causes for such an imbalance, and the more you will speed up the process of your growth that will finally enable you not only to experience the need to give love as much as the need to receive love, but eventually also to find the necessary outlet.
QUESTION: I have discovered in my work that mixed in with healthy and productive pleasure there is also destructive or self-destructive pleasure. The latter can't always be recognized as such and is difficult to get rid of. There seems to be in me a confusion between the pleasure principle and rejection, as well as between happiness and selfishness. What can you suggest?
ANSWER: Apart from the question of masochism, about which I have spoken considerably in the past, I have this to say: Here the either/or attitude of the child in you prevails. The child in you feels that if you are in pursuit of pleasure, then you are not in reality. For reality means rejection and unpleasure. Therefore you escape from it and you build up your pleasure in your fantasy. Then this seems to confirm the contention -- the image -- that reality and pleasure are incompatible. To a lesser degree this can be found in every human being, but to a greater extent it is found in emotional illness and in mental illness. If this misconception did not exist to begin with -- in other words, if one knew that reality is not only feeling rejected but also being in pleasure -- then one would not need to seek pleasure only in unreality. This is the confusion. By the same token, the confusion between happiness and selfishness is also based on the principle of either/or. The child in you feels that if you are happy, then you must be selfish, while all unselfishness automatically goes against your interest and your gratification. This is not so in reality. Only the inner process of growth through which you are going will give you the inner understanding and the conviction that happiness and unselfishness are not incompatible.
QUESTION: You discussed in the last lecture that the effect of one person being in truth about himself is of greater cosmic importance than we can possibly realize. Can you explain this?
ANSWER: If you think for a moment of the effect of the negative, distorted soul parts of a human being in the sense I discussed in this lecture, then you will understand the opposite. Any pseudo solution is bound to reject another human being. When you submit, then you do not experience the truth of the other person's humanity, of his needs, of his problems, and of his insecurity. In your demand to possess a strong and ever loving protector you must be disappointed, perhaps unconsciously so, and in your disappointment you become hostile -- perhaps also unconsciously.
March 16, 1962
Copyright 1962 by Eva Broch