QUESTION: Am I right in thinking that to be in a state of reality would be eventually an equivalent to being in a state of godhood?
ANSWER: Yes, of course. But when this state is sought artificially, because the task of developing the ego seems to become too great, then it is an erroneous way. The ego must be mastered. When I say "the ego," I mean everything that it has to deal with. Let us take an example. In a distorted view, the life of the outer man is often hard. Man has to work hard, he has to struggle for his subsistence and he has to struggle for his survival. Distortion and misconception have brought man to this stage unnecessarily. At the same time man dreams of a state -- one which he will eventually find -- where struggle no longer exists, a state where only bliss exists. An attempt to escape your daily struggle would be an erroneous way to strive for this state. For the struggle corresponds to the ego. Only after the struggle has been positively accepted will it prove superfluous, and then work and pleasure will truly become one. Evading work because of the struggle involved in it leaves important potentials in the psyche and in the ego untended, and therefore unexplored. After such acceptance, an individual discovers the truth of the end of tediousness in daily survival relatively quickly. It is then that he realizes the God-like state to some degree, at least regarding his daily struggle.
QUESTION: About the over-developed and under-developed parts of the ego: Would over-activity be a result of an over-developed ego, while passivity, in an unhealthy manner, would be a result of an under-developed ego?
ANSWER: Yes, that is correct. The functions of the ego further the state of becoming, whereas the real self is the state of being. From man's vantage point there is the common misunderstanding that the state of being means no activity, whereas in fact activity is within the state of being. In the state of being both activity and passivity blend as one harmonious cosmic movement.
QUESTION: Where I am unable to let go of my selfwill and therefore trust in God, that is where my ego is over-developed. Where I fear self-responsibility that is where my ego is under-developed. Is that correct?
ANSWER: Indeed. Where you do not dare to make your own decisions -- in other words, where you lean on ready-made rules -- there your ego is not sufficiently developed. Here you have a very good illustration of what I spoke of in this lecture: Because of one distortion, an opposite distortion is created. Because your ego is under-developed in those areas, something in you tries to attain the selfhood that you simultaneously deny when you refuse self-choice and self-responsibility. Since this entire process occurs in blindness, in lack of awareness, then you choose the wrong way of attaining selfhood, namely that of the selfwill. Concomitantly, your deep psyche feels that there should be a loosening up, and the clutching becomes a strain. You seek this loosening up in the wrong way, namely by not taking hold of your ego in making your decisions. Rather, you choose to do what you are told in blind obedience to rules.
QUESTION: I find it very difficult to let go of the dependency that I feel toward any person, possibly representing my father and my mother. I have been quite aware of this. But what you said about the reluctance of letting go, the childish desire for omnipotence, the dream for pleasure supreme -- all this seems to me to be an important factor. I don't think I realized this sufficiently until now. Could you explain to me how these two act together making it difficult for me to let go?
ANSWER: It is important that in your work you find specifically in what areas you do not wish to give up omnipotence, in what areas you do not wish to give up pleasure supreme, in what areas you do not wish to give up the ease which the spirit longs for. It is a state where hardship does not exist, with all its apparent difficulty of assuming responsibility because it still seems a burden to you. In a hidden corner of your being you believe that the childish state -- one with no adult responsibilities -- can be maintained simply by insisting that your parents continue to care for you. During your self-observation you must find in what specific ways this desire manifests in your emotional reactions.
QUESTION: I understand it, it is very clear. But isn't it a long way that one has to go? One wants a certain experience, a certain pleasure, or a certain power. Must I accommodate myself to the present circumstances, or can I reach out for whatever I want?
ANSWER: Yes, you can, and you certainly should reach out for it. But you can reach out for it adequately only if you first trust that it can happen and if you then let it happen. But you want to do it with your outer ego deficiencies. That is where the ego cannot adequately serve you. This is a gross misunderstanding regarding the functions of the ego. You use your ego where it cannot serve you and you refuse to use it where it must serve you. In other words, you want to attain that pleasure with the limited scope and the limited vision of the ego, with its limited possibilities, rather than through letting nature, life, creation bring it to you in its own way. But you do not trust it because you do not let go. And you can let go of this part of your ego only when you have understood these things and only when you use the ego faculties in their proper way. For example, in stepping aside and claiming that different higher functions fulfill their role for you. When this interplay is first learned and then lived with, then self-trust grows, and therefore a positive chain reaction between the ego and the real self -- the universal forces -- is set in motion.
QUESTION: Isn't the ego connnected with selfwill?
ANSWER: Indeed. False ideas and selfwill are a result of the ego world and not of the real self. But it is also the faculty of the ego to give up both. Only the ego can do so. The ego is necessary in order to change its own mind and its own intent. It is necessary in order to understand that it does have a false idea, to understand that it does not have to operate on selfwill. It is up to the ego either to maintain or to abandon these destructive facets. Only the ego is capable of exchanging a false idea for a truthful one. This means letting go of a tense, anxious selfwill and replacing it with a relaxed, free-flowing, flexible inner will which is based on a discriminating reasoning power. And it means calling upon the intuitive levels of the self to make the choice for the higher guidance of the real self.
QUESTION: I cannot visualize how the law of karma and heredity work and how the process of birth takes place. The baby, being born, and the soul -- does the soul exist before the baby is born? How does that work?
ANSWER: Perhaps the best way for you to perceive these principles would be to think that the human body is a direct result of the personality, which exists prior to the baby's birth. The personality's thinking, attitudes, emotions, and actions. All of these have their results, their effects. The body, its environment, the life, the life situations, and the personal fate are all effects of the mentality, of the personality, and of the character. Both your body and your life conditions are a result of what you are. If you look at the question from this point of view, then you will avoid a great deal of confusion. Then karmic law, heredity, and the specific conditions of birth are no longer a problem. Now you may perceive that the body is built by forces outside the personality. This perception creates confusion because such thinking occurs in a spirit of duality rather than in a spirit of unity, where you would perceive that you -- as well as your body, your country, and every other factor in your life -- are an immediate result of yourself.
QUESTION: It is difficult to feel that.
ANSWER: Of course. You must not try to force such a feeling. It will come by itself if you shelve this problem now as far as feeling it is concerned. The more you comprehend cause and effect in your immediate life -- in those areas where you may still be blind in this respect -- the more must the scope of the inner experience of the real self as the central cause of its life extend. Eventually it will prevail.
QUESTION: I suffer from occasional heart palpitations that have no organic cause. I have found in my work that this is due to repressed guilt. Is there self-punishment involved?
ANSWER: Yes, it is self-punishment, it is the fear of punishment. At the same time, it is the fear of and the resistance to giving up that which causes the guilt in the first place. You have made good progress in your work. Now you need to uncover a level in which you do not want to give up any of the facets that create your guilt. When you do, then you will experience your basic problem, and therefore you will have a profound understanding of it. Self-punishment is often a poor substitute for not wanting to give up your guilt-producing attitudes. You unconsciously believe that by by punishing yourself it is possible to maintain or retain these negative attitudes and to absolve yourself through the guilt you feel. Therefore, you go on punishing yourself, flagellating yourself, and you believe that this somehow makes up for not being willing to give up your destructive patterns. If you say often enough how bad you are -- in other words, if you suffer enough from your guilt -- then you feel that you are still a nice person, in spite of stubbornly maintaining what in actuality is of no conceivable advantage either to you or to others. The realization of this destructive level will come to the degree that you truly wish to find it. Your ego faculties will help you to shed your guilt-producing patterns. Even if something in you doubts, you may relinquish them in the understanding that you have the right to reassume them at any time, should you so desire. This assurance will strengthen your ego, and therefore you will succeed. You will no longer be a helpless prey, but you will take hold of yourself by using your ego in the proper way.
March 19, 1965
Copyright 1965, 1980 by Center for the Living Force, Inc.