QUESTION: I am experiencing something new lately, which is evidently a result of this Pathwork. I am no longer so afraid and frightened, but still something is bothering me. Deep inside I know that I am not afraid, and yet on a more superficial level I seem to think that I am. Is that what you were talking about?
ANSWER: Yes indeed, exactly. It is part of it. You see, you seem to function on two levels simultaneously, as it were. This is a typical experience that a person goes through when transcending the foreign body and beginning to experience and sense this other reaction, coming from his real self.
QUESTION: How can I completely get rid of the fear? Because sometimes I seem to shift the fear to something else,
ANSWER: The moment you shift it onto something else, then you you get away from the reality of the immediate now once again. Therefore, new attempts have to be made by you to get back to the reality of your feelings.
QUESTION: Is it my hostility?
ANSWER: Yes. It is hostility, it is hurt, it is vindictiveness at times, in a way that is turned around -- punishing others by your own state of unhappiness. If you can acknowledge all that, then your fear will vanish. Gradually these emotional attitudes themselves will disappear because they are faced in the now. When you get to the nucleus of your now, then there are no more problems.
QUESTION: My sister has a great compulsion to physically run away. And when she gets there, then she wants to turn around and run back. There is something of which she has a great fear. Can you find out and pinpoint that?
ANSWER: Yes, it is an outer symbol of the inner fear mentiond in this lecture. There is in her a readiness and a willingness to love, the potential for it is great. But in spite of this fundamental potential, there is the afflicted area where the soul does not dare to face what otherwise comes naturally to her. The misconceptions and the confusions that exist in her stop the flow of love. Just because love is such an inborn need for this person, the afflicted area causes even greater self-rejection, and therefore a fear of finding this area, and therefore a flight from the self. Then this is symbolized on the material level by running.
QUESTION: In other words, she has to turn inward?
ANSWER: Of course, that is absolutely necessary, always and in all phases.
QUESTION: Do I run because I don't love or because I am afraid of being rejected?
ANSWER: It is intermingled. The immediate feeling is the fear of rejection. This started very early in life. My friends may have noticed that for the longest time I have shied away from anything that might appear as pointing an accusing finger at you. The implication should be avoided here of "you do not love." This would be grossly misleading and it would only hinder insight. But when the fear of rejection is analyzed -- in any shape, manner, or form -- then there is always that childish fear where love is precluded in this particular respect, regardless of how much love may otherwise exist in you. But please do not take this in a self-moralizing way. This would make it more difficult. Simply acknowledge the level where in this moment you happen to be in fear. Before coming to the level of not loving, other factors have to be recognized. In the final analysis, it amounts to this. But this is not an overall condition, it applies merely to the trouble spots in your psyche. The extent of the area of trouble varies. There are people who may have many areas in which they function healthily, happily, and constructively in life. This corresponds to soul areas that are entirely free from misconceptions, from underestimation of the self, from illusion, from fear, and from other destructive conditions. Hence, in these areas both love and trust exist. There are only isolated areas where the foreign body blurs the inner being, the real being. In other areas almost the entire love capacity may be hindered by such grave impairment and distortion that the overall life is disturbed, disharmonious, unfulfilled, and unhappy.
QUESTION: As I see it, this love you speak of is an expression, in some form or another, at all times, not just in relationships between mates and sweethearts. It is the love for work, and so forth. What could be some of the very highest aspirations for the realization of love in pure flow? Would they usually be a creative force, creative realization? Would this actually be expanding from a point where one has known one's environment, one's experience, to a point that has been unknown before? Would this be true?
ANSWER: Yes, most decidedly yes. Because it is hard for human beings to imagine and to comprehend the nature of the life force. In other words, to conceive of this free-flowing current that is the love force, or to conceive of its versatility, of its scope, of its creativeness, and of the variety of its expressions. But let us suppose that there existed a human being who was entirely free. The inner being of this person would manifest constantly, it would function constantly, and it would express itself constantly. The tremendous power of the life force would flow into all directions. Since there is freedom, then there is no fear of the unknown, and therefore there is no blockage to the free-flowing energy current, and thus to expansion and to the vast possibilities of creation.
QUESTION: Do I understand you correctly that aggression is sometimes a good thing?
ANSWER: Yes, there is a healthy aggression. There also exists a healthy anger. This is a byproduct of the interim stage of human nature. Healthy anger must occasionally exist in a well-integrated life. Healthy anger does not dissipate or weaken the personality. Healthy anger does not create inner disharmony. It is a misunderstanding to either ignore or to deny this fact, which comes from the artificial holding together of one's inner forces and from superimposing false goodness, forced goodness. Fear and obedience lead to the impression that occasional anger should never exist in a person who is spiritually evolved.
QUESTION: In that case you would permit physical violence?
ANSWER: No, healthy anger does not necessarily manifest in physical violence. The expression of negative emotions -- even when they are not healthy -- need not lead to destructive acts, whether they be physical or otherwise.
QUESTION: What about people who are violently persecuted? What should their attitude be?
ANSWER: The instinct of self-preservation will make them fight and defend against such an occurrence, whether by counter-attack or by flight. The healthier the whole personality is, then the more does this instinct function so as to choose the right defense at the right time. This is not an intellectual consideration, but a spontaneous manifestation of the real self. If necessary, then such counter-attack and defense will also be physical.
QUESTION: Regarding the expression of anger, I find it unbearable... [the rest of the question is inaudible].
ANSWER: Sometimes it is inadvisable, sometimes it is advisable. This is what I mean. You have the choice. When you are not aware, then you do not have a choice. The more aware you are of the possibility of this execution of choice, the more freedom you gain, and the less you will feel that your restraint is due to outer demands, to outer authority. Hence the rebellion against the restraint becomes superfluous. There is a great difference between exerting restraint because of the outer demands by the world and exerting restraint because you choose to out of your own free will. Paradoxical as this may seem, the more you willingly choose restraint according to alert reasoning and to a constructive motivation, then the freer you become. It is not -- as is falsely believed -- true that the less self-restraint, the freer the person is.
QUESTION: What about the reverse of what you were just saying: What about the person who is too afraid, or too insecure to show righteous anger? What happens to love in this situation?
ANSWER: This is a very good question. Where there is present a fear of expressing a justified anger, then there must also be a fear of loving. Behind both of them are confusion, misconception, and illusion. It is these misinterpreted hurts and pains that cause the nucleus that I was talking about. This nucleus hinders and obstructs the real self, out of which flows genuine love -- as opposed to superimposed love -- and the capacity to express healthy anger, as opposed to the twisted, tortured anger. When there is this insecurity -- which makes a person too anxious to express his justified anger -- then he is incapable of feeling healthy anger. The justified issue induces conflicting feelings. Healthy anger makes a person stronger, whereas twisted anger makes him weaker. Healthy love is all-embracing and it enriches the person the more he gives out of himself. Sickly, distorted, false love impoverishes the self and it breeds a conflict between one's own self-interest and that of others. It comes from duality and it increases duality: it is always the good versus the bad. Ungenuine love is always connected with self-pity, with resentment, with hostility, with conflict. There is always the feeling of: "I ought to love, therefore I think I love. But I do not want to love because if I do, if I allow myself to, then I will be taken advantage of. Since I ought to love but I do not want to, then I have to feel guilty. I am bad." Hence no healthy anger can exist. It is dissipated at the source, for the person doubts his right to feel anger since he does not dare to love.
April 30, 1965
Copyright 1965, 1980 by Center for the Living Force, Inc.