QUESTION: What makes the perception of pleasure so unique and specific in relation to unpleasure?
ANSWER: This is a very important question. The answer may not seem to be a direct one, but it is. It is known that man fears pleasure when he is still full of conflicts and problems whose nature he does not understand. Anyone on this path who goes deeply enough to probe his reactions discovers the startling fact that he is more afraid of pleasure than he is of pain. Those who have not verified this fact in themselves may find it unbelievable, for they consciously resent the unpleasure and wish it away. To a degree it is true that unpleasure is not really wanted. But man cannot rid himself of the dichotomy between pleasure and unpleasure when he does not go deeply enough into his psychic processes to feel the pleasure in the unpleasure. Total pleasure is feared for a very important reason: the pleasure supreme of the cosmic energy current must seem unbearable -- too much, frightening, almost annihilating -- when the personality is still geared to negativity and destructiveness. To put it differently, to the degree that the personality has impaired its integrity -- to the degree that impurity, dishonesty, cheating, and malice exist in the psyche -- to that degree pure pleasure must be rejected. The pain of the negative pleasure is then the only way the entity can experience a modicum of pleasure. When you find that deep within yourself you fear pleasure as a danger, then you must ask yourself: "Where am I not honest with life? Where am I not honest with myself? Where do I cheat? Where do I impair my integrity?" This shows precisely where, why, and to what degree pure pleasure must be rejected. It further explains why destructiveness is held on to when man ascertains that he himself fears and therefore rejects pleasure, rather than clinging to the illusion that life is depriving him of pleasure. He can help himself by answering the pertinent questions and thus finding the elements of impairment in himself. This procedure is the way out. When he finds where he himself violates his sense of decency and honesty, then he can unlock the door which keeps him stuck in negative pleasure and which forces him to reject pleasure which is unhampered by pain.
QUESTION: Would you define pleasure as expansion and pain as contraction?
ANSWER: Yes, that is quite accurate. Pain is a contraction in the same sense that a cramp is. But there is also contraction in pure pleasure. The difference is that it takes place in a rhythmic, smooth motion, in a harmonious way. Unpleasure is an extended, protracted, cramp-like contraction.
QUESTION: The way I experience the fear of pleasure is by experiencing a fear of losing myself in pleasure. Is that what you meant?
ANSWER: Yes, this is precisely what I meant. It can be explained, when you think about it, in terms of trust. When, either consciously or unconsciously, you sense your hidden little mechanisms for not being straightforward with the life process, when your response to life is negative in any form, and when, consequently, your sense of integrity is impaired, then you cannot trust yourself. Nor can you trust yourself when you run away from the nucleus of your negative pleasure principle, as explained in this lecture. Your negative pleasure first has to be accepted, then has to be understood, and finally has to be inwardly lived through with full self-acceptance before you can trust yourself to be unguarded. As I have often said, your innermost self, your own psychic energies, and the life energies are of one and the same substance. You cannot trust yourself without trusting life. If you distrust yourself for any reason, either right or wrong, then how can you lose yourself into yourself and into life? A trust must exist, and this trust is, in principle, absolutely justifiable. But in practice, in specific manifestations, it is often not justifiable. Full self-acceptance must be established before trust can exist. Then there will no longer be any fear of losing yourself, because trusting will be experienced as bringing you back to yourself, richer than ever.
QUESTION: Is the principle of pain and pleasure characteristic of this earth sphere?
ANSWER: It is characteristic of this earth sphere, but this does not mean incarnated beings only. It means all those who are in this specific state of consciousness, regardless of whether they are in the flesh or out of the body. It applies to all those whose consciousness is geared to the concept of dualism, and who, consequently, cannot perceive the conciliating, unifying way of creation, of life, and of themselves. In all these cases, pleasure and pain must exist as opposites. As I said at the beginning of this lecture, the good and the bad forces, pleasure and pain, are thought of as two separate forces, not as one and the same energy current.
QUESTION: It seems to me that when I do something I don't like, which is meant to invite anger or guilt or jealousy, I have someone else whom I hold responsible for my being the way I am. Is this a valid observation and what should we do about it?
ANSWER: Even if some of the blame is put on the other person's doorstep because that is partially true in the situation -- and this is usually the case with sane human beings -- then there must be something in you that you ignore and which bothers you, for otherwise there could not be a problem, there could not be a disharmonious feeling in you. It is relatively easy to accept the other person's shortcomings or failings. Otherwise, one would not be involved in situations where these failings cannot help but to affect the self negatively. Therefore, the fact of such disturbances points to unknown elements which must be ascertained in order to eliminate the destructive feelings. This anger is essentially directed against the self. You may be angry because you are angry, and you cannot accept this emotion in yourself. You may become angry because you cannot accept a similar or a corresponding aspect in yourself. That is, that which angers you in the other may exist in a slightly different form in yourself. In short, the following question must be asked: "What is it in me that has produced this situation? How am I a co-producer of this situation? In what way do I contribute to it?"
December 2, 1966
Copyright 1966, 1981 by Center for the Living Force, Inc.