QUESTION: It seems to me that with the new phase a new group of subjects has begun this season. Until the end of last season we were still talking much about images and various aspects connected with them. Now we seem to enter a new phase which I can't put my finger on .
ANSWER: Of course it is a new phase. I even said so before your summer vacation. I said that we shall deal with those elements that prohibit your creative faculties in a more direct way than before. It goes without saying that any prohibition of such creative faculties is due to negative aspects, to deviations, to images, and to misconceptions. So we still have to deal with such elements, but the approach is different in this phase, as you rightly perceive. While in the previous phase we concentrated mostly on details that were eclipsing or prohibitive, in the present phase we are able to put the pieces together, so as to gain a more overall view with regard to love, to maturity, and to creativity. This does not mean that we will not discuss details again. But when we do, then the approach will be different.
QUESTION: I should like to discuss something in connection with the last lecture. In the second part, about the concentration exercises, you repeat the term "instructing the subconscious." I was wondering if this idea of instructing the subconscious is not in some way a paradox and may not lead to forcing the subconscious, instead of allowing us to realize what is in it. I am sure it is not a paradox, but in what way is it not?
ANSWER: The question is a good and constructive one because it is easy to go from one wrong extreme to the other. The best way to sense the right way of going about it is this. Do not use such instructions as a force, but as the expression of your inner will. When you realize that certain of your emotions cannot function in the right way yet, then you may express the desire that they should learn. This desire should be uttered without pressure and without haste, but rather with a calm quality, in the realization that emotions do not learn quickly. Moreover, an importan part of such instructions should be for you to affirm that you wish to become aware of where, in what way, and why your emotions still deviate. State that you want to have a growing awareness of where you are still confused. State that you want to become aware of what your inner, unanswered questions are. And, last but not least, express your intention to give up all your resistance to facing yourself fully, honestly, and without restrictions. In this way, you do not superimpose right reactions on still deviating emotions, and thereby you avoid the pitfalls of self-deception and of self-suggestion.
QUESTION: With regard to the last lecture, and relating to the lecture on "The Abyss of Illusion," you say: "You are the master of your life and of your fate. No one but yourself creates your own happiness and your own unhappiness." Again, in the lecture on "The Abyss of Illusion" you state that "this basic spiritual truth has been obscured and for good reason." You go on to say that "humanity in its development is required to reach a certain basic spiritual understanding before it can use this knowledge in the right way, for misunderstood it could indeed be very harmful." Could you clarify this statement for us? I think it might be helpful for us now, in the light of the last lecture. It seems to me that it represents a great step forward to the individual and to humanity, and it could begin a whole new cycle of spiritual development for the individual in society. For science and philosophy could find unity in spiritual law -- and to that end a positive perception of our being in God.
ANSWER: One of your questions seems to ask what the danger of such knowledge, and the resulting misconceptions, would be for a humanity that is still not ready spiritually. Let us go into this first. Since man ignores both the existence and the power of the subconscious mind, he will take such knowledge on a superficial level. This can be dangerous in two ways. If one believes that one creates his own fate and if such a person somehow -- due to certain circumstances and to conditions whose true origins he ignores -- comes to possess certain power, then he would be likely to abuse such power on the ground of this premise. On the other hand, people who do not have such power would feel extremely frustrated. Therefore, their sense of inadequacy would grow. By exploring the significance of emotions which heretore they were unaware of, they would acquire an understanding of the inner world, of its laws, of its reality, and of the interplay of cause and effect in human relationship within this inner world of emotions.
QUESTION: I have been thinking about these things and I should also like to know whether the persistent effort of humanity so far was in order to justify its existence and whether humanity's creativeness was towards that end. In line with your answer, this creativity abides with the spiritual perception of your remark about removing the bonds that prohibit creativity so that the soul can freely express itself in accordance with spiritual law. If we are, in the highest reality, one in mind with God, then we will truly have self-responsibility. It seems to me, in contemplating "The Abyss of Illusion" and what you have been saying about love and creativity, that our responsibility lies in the acceptance of the re-expression of that love and creativity, which has its source in God. In this regard, the attainment of self-mastery... there is a confusion here, I cannot express it.
ANSWER: Could you clarify where the confusion is? It would be helpful for yourself to clarify where the confusion lies. In addition, I cannot answer your question unless I know what it is.
QUESTION: It is about self-responsibility. Certain philosophic fixations we seem to have, which include both a fear of loss and a fear of the unknown. This, again, ties in basically with love and trust, as you mentioned before. I can now see how it ties in and this will answer it...
ANSWER: The fear of the unknown is a very important element in most human beings, to some extent in every human being. But the unknown becomes known as you actually experience all the things that I have been telling you in these lectures. This means a very serious effort in self-search. It is not enough to read these words. It will never do anything really substantial, except perhaps to serve as an incentive to begin, unless you experience all the emotions that we mention here as living within your soul. When you do so, then the unknown becomes known. And where it remains unknown, then it will lose its ability to frighten you because now you can admit to yourself, "I do not know." And that makes an enormous difference.
QUESTION: The word "fear" has come up a number of times this evening. And you used the word "irrational and unfounded fear." This leads me to believe that there must be a rational and a founded fear. We are taught here, for example, that fear has a negative connotation and stands for a destructive emotion. And then we read in Scripture that "the fear of the Lord is the beginning of wisdom." And also, in Zohar (The Book of Splendor) there is a comparison of "love and fear of God on the wings of a bird." I wonder if you could speak a little about these two kinds of fear.
ANSWER: There are two distinct questions, and therefore two distinct answers are required. The first about the rational fear versus the irrational fear. If you are in some kind of danger, then your reaction of fear is healthy. It is like a signal giving you the opportunity to do something about it, to save yourself from danger. In other words, it is constructive rather than destructive. Without the danger signal, then you would be destroyed. This is decidedly different from the psychological, unhealthy, destructive fears that we generally discuss in our work.
QUESTION: It is clear. I should like to add a thought that is related and which supports what you have said. In the Cabbalistic teachings pertaining to the word given to us as "fear," the Hebrew word is Y(I)R(A)H. This word ties in with the ninth of the Ten Sephiroths (Emanations), which is indicated as "Foundation." This is the turning point where involution ends and evolution begins. Here is the start of the upward turn towards God. The awareness of God is the beginning of wisdom.
ANSWER: Yes, that is true. Is there any other question?
QUESTION: What is the psychic law operating between the conscious mind and the unconscious mind? Is there a strict dividing line and what is the law operating that something is down and something comes up?
ANSWER: There is no strict dividing line between the conscious mind and the unconscious mind. In this work you may have noticed that you often expect to find recognitions that were completely unknown to you, although this happens occasionally also. But you know that what you now find as a new recognition, with a new understanding of its significance, was not really new. You merely had looked away, but it was always there. It was in a region somewhere between the conscious mind and the unconscious mind. There is no strict dividing line. Rather there is a fading transition, so to speak. Imagine the entire personality, the psyche, or the mind -- both conscious and unconscious -- as a rounded form. The more evolved and developed a person becomes, the more is this form free of haze and of fog. The less developed a person is, the greater is the part that is fogged up. That which functions consciously is a smaller area. Spiritual philosophies and teachings use the term raising of the consciousness. It means exactly that. If you visualize such a form, then you can imagine that as the consciousness is raised, it comes out of the fog of unconsciousness. Gradually the haze recedes. As a result, you become more conscious of yourself. Since the universe is in you, and since you are a universe unto yourself, then the univeral consciousness can be gained only by this process of self-finding, through which you lift the fog. You cannot gain it by concentrating on things that you learn with your brain alone. That may be valuable, it may prove a tool for this work of self-finding -- which is the process of making the fog recede so that the part which was unconscious becomes conscious.
QUESTION: Does patience hinder ambition?
ANSWER: Patience -- if it is really just that and not a distortion of it, as for instance inertia -- cannot be a hindrance to anything. People often make a virtue out of a fault. Thus, those who are inert may deceive themselves and think thay they are patient. Those who are impatient may deceive themselves and think that they are active and energetic. So it is always a question of finding the real trend or the real emotion. However, no asset can ever be detrimental. But impatience will hinder ambition, because impatience is a form of immaturity. It is the child in man that wants everything, not only according to its own will, but also right now. The child cannot wait. As I explained the last time, it is the child who lives only in the now -- but in the wrong way. It does not feel the reality of the morrow. Therefore, it thinks that what is accomplished now does not count, that it has no reality. The mature being can wait. He realizes that if the desired goal is not accomplished right now, then there must be reasons. Some of those reasons may be in the self, so that the time of waiting is constructively used in first finding and then eliminating those reasons. The time that one has to spend waiting will be used in gaining the necessary -- but still lacking -- insight, ability, or understanding. So patience, if it is really that and not inertia or inactivity, is something purely constructive. Therefore, it can only be an advantage. True patience will always know how to discriminate. At one time, just waiting will be indicated; at another time, action will be right. But patience will also prevail during the times of most concentrated activity, because patience is really an inner state. Therefore, it has nothing to do with the outer manifestation. The person who acts can be inwardly patient. The person who is completely inactive outwardly may be in an inner state of impatience. Is that clear?
QUESTION: Yes, thank you. I would like to hear a definition of patience.
ANSWER: Many definitions are possible. But in the frame of our discussions now, I would like to put it this way. Patience knows that one cannot always have exactly what one wants when one wants it. Patience is not hindered by the pressure, the tension, and the anxiety of the soul. If you analyze that impatience -- and you will find this to be so not because you should accept my words but through your experience of the emotions -- then you will notice that when it is felt, then is accompanied by such feelings of tension, of anxiety, and of inner pressure. All of these are based on a feeling of inadequacy and are connected wih the sense of "I will not be able to accomplish this," whatever "it" is. That is impatience. Hence, patience can exist only in the personality who is secure, who is mature, who knows his limitations, and who trust in the self because he also knows his potentialities. The state of maturity that is our aim will bring, among many other assets, patience.
QUESTION: I would like to go back to the question that was asked about fear and the mismanagement of instinct in that regard. The instinct is natural to us in the normally functioning human being. Would you comment on the mismanagent of instinct in that regard?
ANSWER: It is connected with the question of trust in the self that we discussed before. If you thwart your instincts due to the deviations under discussion, then you do not trust them. You have often found that your fears were unjustified. As a consequence, you ceased heeding them when there would be good reason. Then you are all the more engulfed in fear, never knowing when to trust your intuition or your instinct and when not to. As you cease being fear-ridden for unrealistic reasons, then when fear does come up you will question it intelligently, instead of burying it.
Copyright 1960 by Center for the Living Force, Inc.