QUESTION: There is something very difficult for me to understand here. The fact that one continually chooses a person or a love object who has exactly the same negative trends that either one or the other parent had -- is it really a factor that this particular person has these trends? Or is it a projection and then a response?
ANSWER: It can be both and it can be either. In fact, most of the time it is a combination. Certain aspects are unconsciously looked for and then are found. And they are actually similarities. But these existing similarities are exaggerated by the person. They are not projected -- that is, qualities seen that are not really there -- but they are qualities that are latent to some degree but are unmanifested. These are encouraged and strongly brought to the fore by the attitude of the person who has an inner problem that is unrecognized and therefore unchecked. In other words, you -- I do no mean you personally -- foster something in the other person by provoking him to react that way. The provocation, which is entirely unconscious, is a strong factor here.
QUESTION: I am very confused about thought control. I find it terribly tiring to be constanly alert during the entire day and to live in the immediate here and now. Yet in my work I am entirely submerged, absorbed, and wholly concentrated. I can remain concentrated even for hours. But afterward I find it relaxing to let my mind wander and not use it like the beam of a spotlight on everything that happens around me.
ANSWER: There is a misunderstanding here. I never implied that you should constantly have your mind poised, let alone be tense in your mind. You do not have to concentrate steadily on a particular subject. That is not the way to go about it. If you can bring yourself to engage in this five-minute exercise every day, in the most relaxed way, then you will find that gradually you will become more alert and more awake in a natural way, not in a forced way. It is a gradual process of growth that happens without direct volition. In other words, without forcing. If you relax and let your mind wander after a strain, then that is fine. There is nothing wrong in that. I never said that you should do these concentration exercises twenty-four hours a day. I said that you should try it for about five minutes a day. Then you will begin to function better in many ways. The fact that it makes you tired to be "right here in the now" and that your spirit has to wander away is a sign of some mismanagement in your inner make-up. Every person needs an occasional rest, during which the spirit leaves the body. This happens regularly during sleep. But if the spirit has to wander away during waking hours in order to be relaxed, then it means that there is something that is not proprly managed between the spirit, the body, and the mind. This has many damaging effects. It makes you miss out on life; it makes you not see and not perceive reality; it makes you not observe people around you. But in order to remedy the situation, you should not forcefully concentrate during all your waking hours.
QUESTION: You have stated that emotional maturity is the willingness and the capability to love. It seems to me that intellectual maturity must mean something else. How do the two intrplay and influence each other?
ANSWER: Both are necessary functions of the healthy individual. As I once put it, they are like the two legs that you need in order to walk through life. Intellectual maturity is your capacity to think, to judge, to evaluate, to discriminate, to form concepts, to plan, to use your will, to use your mind, to make decisions, to utilize your assets, to direct your life, and, last but not least, to re-educate your childish emotions by implanting the proper concepts -- this time your own -- which you have arrived at independently by thinking things through. In other words, not because others said so, but because you deliberated on them and they are your own. Thus, your intellect can influence your emotions by your capacity to think. On the other hand, unchecked and childish emotions can influence your thinking capacity by coloring your views, and thus by making you lose your objectivity. Intellectual maturity is your your capacity to think. The way you manage your emotional reactions, your feelings, and your instincts determines your emotional maturity, or the lack of it.
QUESTION: Might a person be developed much further in one direction than in the other?
ANSWER: Indeed, often there is an imbalance between these two "legs," with one leg being more developed than the other. This imbalance causes a lack of integration in the human being. Among other aspects, the purpose and the aim of this work is to achieve a proper balance. In many areas a person is more developed in one direction -- in one area of his or her personality -- with an imbalance in the other. Many who do not pursue a path such as yours continue to nurse and cultivate the aspect that is already overdeveloped. That is not healthy. It does not bring the harmony and the balance desired. It is done because most people prefer to think of their strengths rather than of their weaknesses.
QUESTION: Would you say that the lack of emotional development is indicated by particular likes and dislikes without discriminating as to what the values are? We use the wrong yardstick. Instead of measuring and discriminating, we are either for or against something because we "like" or "dislike" it, regardless of its intrinsic merit.
ANSWER: Exactly, I spoke about that in one of the lecturs. That is the subjectivity that arises out of the childish emotions. Of course, a halfway intellectually mature person will find adequate reasons to hide this emotional reaction and his subjectivity. That is what is called a rationalization. An intellectually mature person will find reasons and explanations for his irrational, emotional, subjective behavior or attitude.
QUESTION: At one time you said that you could hear the soul scream. Does that also work between the different unconscious mind of one human being and another? Does one unconscious hear the screaming of the other? Is that why one feels the hostility emanating from the other person?
ANSWER: Yes. That is why I always say that your unconscious affects the unconscious of the other person. You go through life resenting other people because they do not respond to your outer actions. You yourself are unaware of what your inner actions are. Your inner actions -- your reactions -- are accurately perceived by your fellow human beings, and they react to that part of you. Their souls hear that voice, or they perceive it with other inner sense organs of hearing, of seeing, of smelling, and of tasting. That is why the unconscious of one affects the unconscious of the other.
QUESTION: How can I make the distinction between whether the other person provoked me or I the other person?
ANSWER: It is not necessary to find who started it, for this is a chain reaction, a vicious circle. It is useful to start by finding your own provocation, perhaps in response to an open or to a hidden provocation of the other person. Thus you realize that because you were provoked, you provoke the other person. And because you do so, then the other again responds in kind. But as you examine your real reason -- not the superficial one -- for being hurt in the first place, and therefore provoked -- in the sense of this lecture -- then you will no longer regard this hurt as disastrous as it had appeared before. In other words, you will have a different reaction to the hurt. As a consequence, the hurt will diminish dramatically. Also, as the need to reproduce the childhood situation decreases, you will become less withdrawn and you will hurt others less and less, so that they will not have to provoke you. And even if they do, now you will understand that they are reacting out of the same childish blind needs as you do. As you gain a different view of your own hurt, by understanding its real origin, you will gain the same detachment to the reaction of the other person. You will find exactly the same reactions going on in you as in the other. But as long as that conflict remains unresolved in you, then the difference seems enormous. You ascribe a different motivation to the other person's provocation than to your own, even when you realize that you actually initiated the provocation. Thus you perceive reality, whereas before you did not. And so you begin to break this vicious circle.
QUESTION: Is it possible in some way to make a truce, for even two or three minutes, between one's own unconscious and the unconscious of the other person? Sometimes you see the reality intellectually, but by the time you order your unconscious to do something, it is already in revolt and has made the other person unhappy, and then you are unhappy too. It might all have been avoided if there had been a few minutes of truce.
ANSWER You see, my dear, in the fist place it is not a question of "ordering" your unconscious. You cannot order it. That is impossible. As long as you attempt such commands, then it will resist. Or else it may deceive you, so that you then deceive yourself. The unconscious can be reeducated only by the slow and gradual process pursued in this work. The most important thing is that you become fully aware of what you really feel. Most of the time you are only half aware of your emotions. So you resort to superimposing on your real reactions another set of feelings. These may be other negative emotions, or if they are positive, then you are deceiving yourself even more. Only by stripping away all these superimpositions can you understand the reason why your unconscious is often so stubborn. If it continues to resist your good efforts, then it means that there must be something present that you have not yet connected with and then understod. When this connecting happens, then you will not need a short truce. You will have real peace with yourself, and therefore with others. While you may command or force a truce in your outer actions, through your words or even through your thoughts, the unconscious does not respond to such discipline. It goes on in its own way until it has really changed.
QUESTION: Suppose a person is able to bring his house to order. Will he or she then eliminate provocations in the other person?
ANSWER: You do not even have to bring your house to order to the extent of being fully mature and more or less perfect. This perfection hardly ever exists in the human sphere. But the awareness of your immaturity -- really understanding it and having a clear insight into those of your reactions and feelings that cause the provocation -- will weaken it sufficiently, and you will progress until you will finally cease to bring on provocations and, in turn, will not be provoked by others in the same way. As you gain a certain healthy detachment from yourself, the smoldering unhealthy drive -- the force -- will be taken out of your emotional reactions. In fact, I would say that this is the only kind of valid "truce" that can be accomplished. Allow yourself to see what you really feel and know why you feel it. When you have an overall view of your emotions, without any further subterfuge and self-deception, then you will feel at peace. In other words, then the knowledge of your existing immaturity will no longer disquiet you. It will have a very calming effect on you. You will have made peace with yourself by accepting your still-existing imperfections. Consequently, you will not try to push yourself into a perfection that you cannot possibly attain at the moment. Once you accept the reality of your imperfect self, then the hurts resulting from such imperfection will no longer be serious and tragic. You will accept them as an inevitable consequence of your imperfections -- which now you can observe calmly while gaining more understanding about them, thus coming closer to perfection and to maturity. In this way your hostility will vanish and your provocations will cease as well. Although relapses will occur, now you will accept them with a realistic outlook. You will derive further insight from them, knowing that ithey take place because something has not yet penetrated deeply enough, so that it has to be found again so as to be assimilated on deeper levels of your being.
November 11, 1960
Copyright 1960, 1980 by Center for the Living Force, Inc.