QUESTION: In disciplining yourself, when you reach the point of wanting to change a pattern because you have made certain recognitions, a battle begins. You may do it, but you do not feel good about it. Although you know you are unhappy in the old way and you want to change, yet in doing the right act you do not feel good either. I heard you say that in this stage you are not ready; but when are you going to discipline yourself?
ANSWER: In this stage, the discipline should take the form of finding out why you cannot feel right about it. What stands in the way of your understanding? There must be something in you that is not yet convinced -- in other words, that is doubtful that this new way is good or advantageous, or safer, or whatever. In short, there must be a part in you that still stands by the old destructive way, in spite of seeing that it is destructive. Therefore, do not force yourself or discipline yourself in action toward others, but rather use discipline in order to find out more about yourself.
QUESTION: When you suffer grief, when you are separated from someone and you know that this must be and you accept it, you still suffer deep pain, even more so when you are aware of your own feelings and you are aware of the depth of love you have. This is healthy, is it not? Doesn't it take time to heal?
ANSWER: I cannot answer the question by saying that it is either healthy or unhealthy. It depends entirely on how it is felt. It may be something utterly healthy. But it may also contain certain unhealthy currents. It is very hard to determine in a general answer. For it is completely individual. In order to determine whether or not it is healthy, my advice is that you ask yourself where there may also be feelings of helplessness, of weakness, of self-pity, and of being subjected to the misery of life. If your personality feels impoverished by such a separation, then there must be present an unhealthy grief, perhaps in addition to the healthy grief. But if the loss is felt as painful without a feeling of self-impoverishment, then it is purely healthy.
QUESTION: If a human being finds two conflicting currents within, if one recognizes the falsity of one current and then the second current kicks in, how and where does the discipline come in?
ANSWER: As I said before, the discipline, if we can call it that -- for the use of this word might lead to misunderstanding -- would have to be used in a different way. It may lead to repression, to suppression, to a forceful, superimposed action that cannot be genuine growth. Your concentration and your determination should go in the direction of further understanding why this current exists. The outer answers may be obvious, and yet there must also be an inner answer that has little to do with the outer one. This current may be some sort of pseudo protection. It may fulfill a certain false need. Find this meaning and you will know how to go on from there. The first answer that you find deep within may still not be the final answer. It may still contain a further "why." The stage which you describe indicates that the phase of search in this area has not been finished and therefore change, with its necessary discipline, is premature. In other words, full awareness here has not yet been reached. At the same time, in another area a state of change may already have occurred, but not in this respect. I repeat, change takes place constantly in your emotional organism, in your mental organism mental, in your spiritual organism, and even in your physical organism by concentrated search, by the fact that you face yourself in utter candor. That, too, produces change. But this is the first type of change that I discussed and not the second, which requires a more direct form of discipline. In this stage discipline must also exist, but with the emphasis on further self-facing in order to determine what you really feel and why.
QUESTION: I see. So, as long as two conflicting currents exist, there is still a need to go deeper?
ANSWER: Oh, yes. (Thank you)
QUESTION: I hesitate to ask any questions owing to the recent stir that my questions brought. It seems that they are not considered exactly intelligent. Before I ask my questions, I would like to ask you frankly if you higher developed souls are employing a reason that I am not capable of understanding, because unless we are talking on a common ground, then I am afraid that we have no means of communication with one another.
ANSWER: My dear friend, in the first place, I do not think that anyone can say that if someone does not understand, then it indicates a lack of intelligence. Even the most intelligent person is blocked where he has a problem. The intelligence that exists does not function where there is a mental block. That happens to every single person -- to some more obviously than to others. There is no human being entirely free of this. I have never yet seen a human being in whom there is not somewhere a tightness, somewhere a prejudice, somewhere a blind spot, somewhere a fear of relinquishing a preconceived idea. This is due to the defense mechanism that chooses a particular view as necessary and as safe. However, this is only one possible explanation. It does not do away with the fact as such. In such a case the person will not understand. He will misinterpret. He will be either anxious and conflicted about the issue, or he will hear the opposite of what is being said. Only the degree differs. No one should judge because he may have the same condition to a lesser or to a less noticeable degree, perhaps concerning a different issue. So you are in very good company. You may perhaps put your questions in a more belligerent way, but I do not mind this and I encourage you to ask these questions, as long as you are sincere and in good faith, regardless of what some of our human friends may say. It is necessary. It is good for you. And it is good for everyone.
January, 1961
Copyright 1961, 1979 by Center for the Living Force, Inc.