QUESTION: I have many daydreams. When I stop, then my fears become active. When my fears recede, then I start daydreaming again. Why is that?
ANSWER: Because both have the same common denominator, the same root. They are both an expression of your self-alienation. You know from your recent findings that your conscious fears are not your real fears. They are displaced fears. They are the fears you want to have rather than the basic fear that you do not wish to face: the fear of being yourself. You are aware of this, are you not? (Oh, yes.) Therefore, since these are not your real fears, they take the same escape mechanism as your daydreams. You experience either substitute fears or substitute fulfillments. Since you do not face and tackle the problem of becoming yourself, then you cannot have the fulfillment that everyone inwardly strives for. Therefore, you create substitute fulfillments that you partially experience, but only in fantasy. It is as though your psyche says: "as long as I do not face my real fear, then I do not mind having other fears. But as long as I remain in this attitude, then I cannot be fulfilled. Therefore I need substitute fulfillments." The one is tied to the other. This is why you alternate between experiencing pseudo-fears and experiencing pseudo-fulfillment in daydreams. (I can't connnect my daydreams and my fears in a concrete way.) This is not necessary. If you proceed to face the reason why you fear to be yourself and you develop from that point, then these other questions will fall into place. But if you wish, you can observe the nature of your daydreams and the nature of your fears and you might discover the connection I just indicated.
QUESTION: What is the difference between drives and needs?
ANSWER: A need is a basic function of the human entity. A need is something real, unless it is displaced and then is superimposed with an unreal one. A drive comes from compulsions. These come into existence out of your misconceptions, out of your images, out of your lack of belief in yourself, out of your idealized self-image, and from resorting to pseudo-solutions. All these create drives, while the needs may be wants that are utterly healthy.
QUESTION: If a person does not daydream at all, is this a sign of lack of imagination or of maturity?
ANSWER: It could be a sign of maturity, but not always. It would be a hasty and oversimplified generalization to answer this question with an either/or. If a person does not consciously daydream, then it may indicate something else, but not necessarily a lack of imagination. This is a label that would not get us very far. For what is the lack of imagination? It may mean that your creative faculties are inhibited. Not having conscious daydreams may also indicate resignation, stagnation. This may sound paradoxical, because I just finished telling you that an overproduction of daydreams, at the expense of actual living, is unhealthy. Now I am telling you that not to daydream may also be unhealthy and a symptom of your unresolved problems. Nevertheless, this is often so in many respects. The presence of a symptom may indicate something that is similar to its absence. For example, the overproduction of daydreams at the expense of actual living may indicate that a part of the psyche is still not reconciled to not living. The underproduction of them may indicate an inner giving up. One would have to take into account the kind of daydreaming -- as well as many other considerations -- before one can accurately determine the reason for their underproduction.
QUESTION: Isn't it often the case that when one is younger one daydreams, but that when one gets older and knows that these goals are not reachable anymore one gives up daydreaming entirely?
ANSWER: Of course it is possible. But it is also very often the case that daydreams have not been given up. They merely take on a different form or manifestation.
QUESTION: I'm confused about harmony and happiness. I always thought they were the same. Also, it is said that the universal laws are harmonious, yet many manifestations of nature are not harmonious at all.
ANSWER: You see only fragments of these laws. If you see the fragment of a whole, then you cannot perceive the meaning. Therefore, you cannot understand the harmony. In fact, if you see only a fragment of the whole, then it may appear as the opposite of the whole. However, in a higher state of being harmony and happiness are the same, just as love, truth, wisdom, as well as any other divine manifestation, are all one whole. The lower the state of development, the more they appear as not being the same. On the earth sphere all divine manifestations may or may not appear as being the same. In fact, they often seem to contradict one another. For instance, a truth may hurt, at least temporarily. To the extent that the person develops, to that degree even the most unpleasant truth will have a liberating effect. As a result, it will no longer be contradictory to love. Conversely, the less developed the person is, the more he will experience an unpleasant truth as harsh, and therefore as unloving. Separateness of concepts exists where imperfection exists, where separateness of the soul exists.
QUESTION: Sometimes when we have an unsolved problem and we go to sleep relaxed and intending to have the problem solved, it may happen that we wake up with the solution. Then one's unconscious mind has solved it.
ANSWER: Terms are often confused by people. And the terms are really not important, as long as we understand what is meant. There is really only one thing important to know about the meaning of the unconscious, whatever name you give to it, and that is the lack of awareness. When you are unconscious, then you are not aware. Of course, there are degrees of awareness. My friends, do not imagine that your unconscious mind is either a perfect and wise superstructure or a monstrous animal. Many people have both extreme attitudes toward their unconscious. It is neither. The unconscious mind does not necessarily have anything to do with your real self, with the higher self; nor with the lower self, that part in you that you negate. Both sides of your nature can be conscious in part and unconscious in part. As far as both sides are concerned, you may have different levels of awareness. For instance, you may be conscious of certain factors in yourself or conscious of certain general concepts, but you may not be conscious of their entire significance. Then your awareness is neither completely absent nor is it completely present. There exists a degree of awareness.
February 16, 1962
Copyright 1962, 1980 by Center for the Living Force, Inc.