2002 STATISTICS BACK
Look at all the stats you geeks
Average Points Per Position Player | ||||||||||
Foster | Handy | HB | Ish | Mitch | Newms | OMs | Pounders | Sausage | WarDan | |
QB | 14.6 | 15.7 | 18.7 | 16.7 | 13.2 | 18.7 | 14.8 | 16.8 | 16.9 | 18.2 |
RB | 14.1 | 16.5 | 19.0 | 14.8 | 17.9 | 14.4 | 23.5 | 19.2 | 17.1 | 14.7 |
WR | 10.3 | 17.6 | 16.6 | 19.1 | 14.1 | 14.7 | 13.4 | 13.7 | 14.0 | 15.1 |
TE | 6.4 | 5.6 | 8.2 | 5.5 | 9.5 | 10.7 | 9.1 | 5.9 | 10.4 | 7.1 |
K | 9.5 | 9.6 | 7.5 | 9.2 | 9.4 | 9.1 | 6.6 | 8.1 | 7.3 | 7.4 |
D | 10.9 | 9.1 | 7.4 | 7.8 | 11.9 | 9.8 | 9.9 | 8.6 | 10.5 | 14.9 |
Leage Average
|
||
Position | Avg | St Dev |
Q | 16.4 | 7.4 |
R | 17.1 | 9.9 |
W | 14.9 | 8.5 |
TE | 7.8 | 6.7 |
K | 8.4 | 4.7 |
D | 10.1 | 7.8 |
The story with this graph:
Lot more offense in 2002.
QB: In 1999, we lowered passing TDs from 6 to 4.
RB: We haven't changed the points at all, but Faulk lit it up in 2000 and Holmes did this year. Running Backs in 2002 were the highest point position.
WR: In 2002, by getting rid of the third WR, the average goes up. Until then, there had been little noticeable changes to WR.
K: Despite boosting the points for long field goals (40+ yds) from 5 to 7 a couple of years ago (I think in 2000), Kickers keep becoming less of a factor in our league.
Defenses: In 1997 I think we added 1 point for sacks, that's why it jumped that year. The addition in 2000 of Kickoff and Punt returns as a Defensive score maybe has bumped Defenses, but probably not by much. The increases in offense are probably taking points away from Defenses.
TE: Began in 2002 for the first time. They are the lowest scoring position.