《方程式定義﹕愛＝﹖》 ——普賢真人→太公望     "Defining Equation: Love = ?" -- Fuugen Shinjin -> Taikoubou   愛，是什麼﹖ What is love? 如果愛有定義，那､定義為何﹖ 什麼樣的線條，才能夠劃清愛開始和終止的界限﹖ 什麼樣的規律，才能夠預測愛行進的動向﹖ 什麼樣的程式，才能夠計算出愛的寬度､愛的長度､   這名為“愛”的感情的深度﹖ If love is defined, what would be that definition? What lines can be drawn to decide where love begins and ends? What rules can be set to predict the course love takes? What laws can be used to calculate the width, the breadth, the       very depth of the emotion that is love? 愛，到底是什麼﹖ What, is love? 如果愛有定義，那､能否以時間定義﹖ 認識你的時間是否影響我的判斷､扭曲我眼前所見的人﹖ If love is defined, is it defined by time? Does the length of time I have known you affect my judgement,       distort what I see of the person before me? 如果愛有定義，那､能否以空間定義﹖ 你我之間的距離是否影響我的思念､隨著你的接近增長﹖ If love is defined, is it defined by space? Does the distance between us affect my longing for you,       increasing proportionally, as you come closer to me? 如果愛有定義，能否以我想到你､脫口說出你的名字的次數定義﹖ 如果愛有定義，能否以你握住我､開口呼喚我的名字的次數定義﹖ If love is defined, is it defined by the number of times I       think of you, speak of you by name? If love is defined, is it defined by the number of times you       reach for me, call for me by name? 愛，到底是什麼﹖ What, is love? …這種“需要”到底是什麼感情﹖ ……希望你只聽得見我､這種“需要”﹖ ……希望你只看得見我､這種“需要”﹖ ……希望你只對我說話､這種“需要”﹖ ……希望你只和我一起､這種“需要”﹖ What is this feeling, this need? What is this need - to have you hear only me? What is this need - to have your eyes only on me? What is this need - to have you speak only to me? What is this need - to have you only with me? 但… 並不是如此簡單。 “佔有你”並非我所需。 愛､並非只是如此､並非只是這種“需要”。 And yet ... It is not so simple, this need. Possession of you is not what I need. Love is not only this feeling, this need. 愛､是自由的。 無法獨佔自由。 無法囚禁､剝奪自由。 無法將它以雙手抓住､無法以武力逼它屈服。 Love is free. I cannot possess that which is free. I cannot hold it captive, against its will. I cannot trap it within my hands, cannot touch it with force. 愛究竟是什麼﹖ 如果我能夠給愛一個定義，那､   是否代表能夠給我對你的感覺一個定義﹖ What is love? If I can define love, can I define what I feel for you? ~OWARI~ ~OWARI~

copyright 2001 © 琴心