Kate Elliot, also known as Alis Rasmussen, is the author of the popular Jaran series, as well as the new fantasy series The Crown of Stars and one third of the immensely successful The Golden Key with Melanie Rawn and Jennifer Roberson.
Q. Can you tell me a little about your current project?
A. I've wanted to write an epic fantasy trilogy since I read Tolkien's Lord of the Rings at 14, but I've taken my time getting to it because I didn't want to write just a rehash of a plot Tolkien did better than anyone else. I finally reached the point both creatively and professionally where I was ready and, I thought, able to write my own contribution to fantasy literature.
Crown of Stars is a fantasy series set in an alternate fantasy universe somewhat modeled on 10th century German history but mostly cobbled together from economic and religious structures I wanted to play with, in particular a stronger role for women that could be given some kind of rational basis in a low technology/high conflict society.
I love fantasy for its sense of wonder and magic and for the wonderful
evocative landscapes that the reader can explore. When I started Crown of
Stars I deliberately set out to write a novel that would appeal to the girl I
was at 16, with that sense of magic and wonder, and yet also something
that would reward the thirty-something woman I now am, with insight into
character and some thoughtfulness about the nature of religion and society;
of course, I also tried to put in lots of lurid intrigue, sex, violence, betrayal,
honor, and glory just for sheer entertainment!
Crown of Stars, by the way, will be only a four volume fantasy trilogy. I'm
keeping it short!
Q. Everyone who reads this site knows I'm mildly allergic to Big Fat
Fantasy, but I've very much enjoyed the Jaran series so far and look
forward to reading the Crown of the Stars and it's successors. Still, I'd like
to ask you how an author wakes up one day and finds the ideas she's been
brewing will take several thousand pages to work out. How do you keep
the threads together for that long?
A. My father was a history teacher and educator before he retired. I think
that growing up with history is the reason I write multivolume novels instead
of standalone ones. First of all, any story happens in the context of a culture
or cultures. If that culture is imagined with enough depth, then the culture
itself becomes a character in the story. It begins to 'act' as a player;
characters make choices because of who they are and what they believe. It
has a 'past,' that is, what we call history. Once your setting takes on this
much 'three dimensionally,' it becomes like a very well done stage set: it
suggests an entire world hidden behind it. That alone is enough to start an
idea expanding.
Also, my books tend to be about consequences. Actions have
consequences, often unintended ones. Once you've read enough history,
you realize that even if a major character dies, life goes on, other stories
continue, and even events set into motion because of action or inaction on
the part of the main character still ripple out into the world around.
In a way, the Jaran books are about a single event, Tess and Ilya meeting,
and how that sets off a chain reaction of consequences, some of them
unexpected even to me, the author! Obviously their meeting isn't the whole
of the world, or the only thing that matters or the sole event that triggers
many of the other events in the Jaran books, but as a novelist you need a
good starting point, something to jump off from, and it's a trick to learn the
right place to start.
It can be difficult to keep the threads together, I admit. I took a break after
writing Jaran #4, The Law of Becoming, for precisely that reason: the
world had opened up so far, and things had happened that I hadn't planned
on, that I needed to stop and retrench, to take in what had happened and
figure out what the heck I was going to do next!
What I do try to do to keep the threads together is to keep focused on the
main story, and to limit the number of point of view characters I use. In the
Jaran books, for instance, characters who are main players in one book
might be seen only briefly in another, even if I very much liked writing about
them. This way I hold the focus to only those main characters whose story
must be told in this volume.
I'm having the same problem in the Crown of Stars series. In this case I
know where I'm going and it's a matter of layering in hints, events, and
foreshadowing so that I'll lead the readers to exactly where they need to be
at the climax of volume four. I find this a bit harder to do, actually. It's more
natural for me to write about unfolding
consequences, as in the Jaran books.
Q. With the Jaran books you mix very strong female characters with very
traditional (well, perhaps not all that traditional) romances. How in heck do
you manage that?
A. I write female characters about whom I'd like to read. The things that
happen to them could happen to any kind of character. I guess it's more a
matter of perspective than anything, that I try to write these female
characters from a position of strength, and that I assume that any romance
that happens to them is only one part of their life, not the only part of their
life; in addition, I try to show vulnerability in their male counterparts without
writing vulnerability as weakness. If each character is equally strong--and
vulnerable--then I think the love story can play out without seeming to place
one in a superior and one in an inferior position.
The love story in Jaran is certainly a fairly traditional one; I did however try
to play with reader expectations by making some changes in the gender
roles of the Jaran people themselves, which in some cases reversed the
'standard' roles of my two main characters. And in the later books I wrote
certain subplots that were deliberately meant as ironic commentary (for
instance, the Diana, Marco, Anatoly story) on the first novel, which is pretty
darned pie-in-the-sky. Don't get me wrong: I love to read a good love story
myself; Jane Austen's Pride and Prejudice is certainly one of my three
favorite novels. And I loved writing JARAN for that reason, as a kind of
homage to one of my favorite
novelists.
Q. Speaking of mixing, the same series marries science fiction -- a detailed
and subtle conflict between humans and the technologically advanced aliens
-- with a very traditional fantasy with the conquering king uniting the tribes,
complete with ritual, near magic and lots of swordfights. How much of a
juggling act was this?
A. Not that much, really. I think of it more as juggling science fiction and
history, since I focused on historical models to a great extent for many of
the events in the later Jaran novels. I love stealing from history; it's the best
source material. And if as a writer you really get in touch with a mindset
that's subtly different from ours, that can give it a fantasy feeling--the same
one, in fact, that I've tried to create in the Crown of Stars series, which is
fantasy!
Q. You're one of a small but growing number of authors who has
experience a mid-career "name change" in order to give good writing a
second start. Care to comment on the practice?
A. There's not much to say. When the computers rule how ordering is
done, you do what is necessary to keep publishing. The books themselves
matter more to me than the name that's on them. They're still my books, and
I don't write them any differently whether the byline is Alis Rasmussen or
Kate Elliott. Of course, I still have a hankering to collaborate with myself. I
think that would be fun!
Q. Tell me a little about working with Melanie Rawn and Jennifer Roberson
on The Golden Key. How did it get done? Who labeled you three "The
Dream Team of Fantasy?" And, most importantly, how did you feel about
getting a Whelan cover?
A. It was both fun and rewarding to work with Melanie and Jennifer, as
well as very hard work because we wanted this book to be something
special. We did some of our initial idea work via mail and fax, then met for
three days of brainstorming. It was an amazing weekend; we all seemed to
be on the same wavelength, and the story came together in a marvelous
way.
After that we wrote our individual sections separately, then mailed them to
each other for a bit of gentle critique
Q. Each of the three will be writing "prequels" to the novel -- what's yours?
A. I will be writing a sequel, actually, set about forty years after The
Golden Key. In the USA it will be called The Seeker and in the U.K. it will
be called The Iron Key. The story will focus on a grandson of Saavedra
Grijalva and his quest to free himself from the Grijalva Gift, which he
considers a curse.
Q. Do you have a "favorite child" of the literary variety? A particular novel
or short story that's special for you?
A. More than any particular novel, I think there are scenes in each novel
that stand out for me, that I feel truly capture the emotion or image I wanted
to evoke (maybe more for me than for any readers!) I will say, though, that
of all my books, the one has the most personal resonance for me is The
Law of Becoming, it, more than any of my other books so far, blends the
bitter and the sweet in a way that I find satisfying.
Q. What do you read for pleasure?
A. Science fiction and fantasy, of course. Other fiction as well; I recently
re-read Robertson Davies' What's Bred in the Bone. I love reading good
history; currently I'm reading the essays of the historian Karl Leyser, whose
specialty was medieval Germany. I also generally read the Sunday New
York Times, and such magazines as World Press Review, WIRED, the
Washington Post Weekly, The Nation, and Scientific American when I
can get my hands on a copy.
Q. Who else would you recommend for someone who enjoys your books?
A. Let me just suggest two writers: Katharine Kerr's Deverry series, and
Kim Stanley Robinson's Mars trilogy.
Kate Elliot's books are published by DAW and can be ordered through
most of the bookstores mentioned in the Online Bookstores Net Links.