Assignment #15 Educational Unit

 

Title of Unit:  BAR EXAM REVIEW[1]

 

Objective:  Prepare for bar exam.

 

Procedure:  Read each question carefully and attempt to answer.  Then log on to the relevant Web sites to determine the correct response.

 

 

 

Lesson 1:  Civil Procedure and Evidence

 

            The plaintiff’s Original Unverified Petition filed January 29, 1999, alleges, in part, the following facts:

 

  To the Honorable Judge of  Said Court:

Discovery Level Designation

I.                   The plaintiff intends that his suit be covered by Level 2, Discovery Control Plan, pursuant to Rule 190.3 Texas Rules of Civil Procedure.

 

 

1.                  Under this Discovery Control Plan,

 

(a)          How many interrogatories may one party serve on any other party?

(b)         How many hours of oral deposition are permitted each “side”?

(c)          Assuming one “side” in this litigation designates more than two experts, how many additional hours of total deposition time may the opposing side have for each additional expert designated?

(d)         What discovery level (1, 2 or 3) applies if the plaintiff does not or cannot plead an appropriate discovery level pursuant to the rule?

(e)          Does the plaintiff’s pleading of “Level 2” discovery foreclose his propounding a “Request for Disclosure” under Rule 194?  Explain.

1.:  http://www.supreme.courts.state.tx.us/rules/finalrd.htm

 

 

Assume the petition continues:

 

II.                 The plaintiff Pedro Martinez is an individual and the parent and next friend of his minor daughter, the plaintiff Mijita.  Both are residents and citizens of Maverick County, Texas.

III.              The defendant EZ Go Inc. is a Delaware corporation doing business in this state as “Quick-NEZ Convenience Stores.”  The defendant operates one of its convenience stores in Eagle Pass, Maverick County, Texas.  This defendant may be served at its corporate headquarters in Boise, Idaho at 123 Main St., by serving Mr. Nathan, vice president.

Venue

IV.            Although the tort that forms the basis of this suit occurred at one of the defendant’s stores in Amarillo, Potter County, Texas, venue is proper in this district court of Maverick County, Texas, since the defendant maintains a retail convenience store in Eagle Pass, Maverick County, Texas.

 

2.                  Assuming the factual recitations in Paragraph 4 are correct, is venue properly maintainable in Maverick County?  Explain your answer.

3.                  Is it necessary in this particular case to invoice Texas’ “Long Arm” statute to obtain proper service on the defendant?  Explain your answer.

4.                  May the defendant EZ Go Inc. remove this case to the proper federal district court (assuming there is $75,000 in controversy)?  Explain your answer.

 

2.:  http://capitol.tlc.state.tx.us/statutes/codes/CV000012.html

3:  http://capitol.tlc.state.tx.us/statutes/codes/CV000014.html

4:  http://law2.house.gov/uscode-cgi/fastweb.exe?getdoc+uscview+t26t28+3169+0++%28%29%20%20AND%20%28%2828%29%20ADJ%20USC%29%3ACITE%20AND%20%28USC%20w%2F10%20%281331%29%29%3ACITE%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20

 

http://law2.house.gov/uscode-cgi/fastweb.exe?getdoc+uscview+t26t28+3170+0++%28%29%20%20AND%20%28%2828%29%20ADJ%20USC%29%3ACITE%20AND%20%28USC%20w%2F10%20%281332%29%29%3ACITE%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20

 

http://law2.house.gov/uscode-cgi/fastweb.exe?getdoc+uscview+t26t28+3175+0++%28%29%20%20AND%20%28%2828%29%20ADJ%20USC%29%3ACITE%20AND%20%28USC%20w%2F10%20%281337%29%29%3ACITE%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20

 

 

Background Facts

IV.              On January 2, 1999, the minor plaintiff, Mijita, an invitee in the defendant’s retail store in Amarillo, Texas, slipped and fell on a foreign substance located on the floor.  The foreign substance made the premises unreasonably dangerous and the defendant know or should have known of the unreasonably dangerous condition.  The defendant’s failure to warn the plaintiff of such condition or otherwise make the premises safe for invites constitutes actionable negligence.

 

5.                  Assume the defendant wishes to file a general denial in response to the entire petition.  Draft the substance of an appropriate and effective general denial in the space provided below:

6.                  Assume the defendant wishes to assert the following affirmative defenses.  Use the space provided below to draft appropriate language for each defense:

(a)                Contributory negligence;

(b)               Sole cause;

(c)                Superseding intervening cause (conduct of third party);

(d)               Act of God;

(e)                Statute of limitations.

7.                  Which, if any, of the above affirmative defenses must the defendant verify?

8.                  Explain your answers to the following questions regarding the due order of pleading:

(a)                The defendant wishes to challenge venue.  First the defendant files a general denial.  Immediately after the general denial, the defendant files a pleading entitled only “Motion to Transfer.”  How should the court rule on the Motion to Transfer?

(b)               The defendant wishes to challenge the sufficiency of service.  The defendant files a timely Motion to Quash and does not file an original answer within the time prescribed by law after service.  Assume the Motion to Quash is granted.  Must the defendant file a responsive pleading or is the plaintiff first required to reissue citation?

(c)                The defendant wishes to challenge personal jurisdiction.  First, the defendant files a special appearance.  Second, the defendant files an original answer.  May the defendant still challenge personal jurisdiction?

9.                  What discovery instrument may the plaintiff serve on the defendant to allow the plaintiff to inspect and photograph the premises and site of the accident at the Quick-N-EZ store?  Is the plaintiff entitled over the defendant’s objection to interview employees of the defendant at the scene of the accident during the inspection and photography session?  Explain your answers.

 

5.:  Rule 92  http://www.io.com/adminlaw/trcp24.htm#II.4.C

 

6:  http://www.io.com/adminlaw/trcp24.htm#II.4.C

 

7.:  Rule 93 http://www.io.com/adminlaw/trcp24.htm#II.4.C

 

8:  http://www.io.com/adminlaw/trcp24.htm#84

 

http://www.io.com/adminlaw/trcp25.htm#II.5

 

9:  http://www.io.com/adminlaw/trcp28.htm#166b

 

 

 

The plaintiff sends out a Notice of Deposition that does not identify the name of the witness to be deposed.  The text of the notice states as follows:

To:  The defendant EZ Go Inc. c/o (counsel of record)

            Take notice that pursuant to Rule 201, the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff will take the oral deposition of the person or persons designated by the defendant EZ Go Inc., to testify concerning the following matters at the law office of the plaintiff’s counsel commencing at 10 a.m. on [Day X].

            The plaintiff wishes to examine the witnesses so designated on the following matters:

A.     The defendant EZ Go Inc.’s policies and procedures regarding cleaning and maintaining its interior floors during working hours.

B.      The defendant EZ Go Inc.’s policies and procedures regarding customer safety.

C.     The defendant EZ Go Inc.’s policies and procedures regarding the investigation of customer accidents.

 

10.              May the defendant quash this notice because it fails to identify the particular witnesses to be interrogated?  Explain your answer.

11.              What discovery instrument(s) would the plaintiff serve to compel the production of documents at the deposition of an employee of the defendant who has custody or control of such documents, and how long before the date set for the deposition must such instruments be served?

 

10:  http://www.io.com/adminlaw/trcp29.htm#II.9.B

11:  http://www.io.com/adminlaw/trcp29.htm#II.9.B

 

 

Lesson 2:  Trusts and Estate

 

            In 1991, Ted Testator, a widower, executed a will valid in Texas.  The will provided as follows:

1.                  I leave my 100 shares of stock in XYZ Company to my oldest son, Sam:

2.                  I leave my 400 acre ranch in Harris County, Texas plus $40,000 cash to my youngest son, Bob; and

3.                  I leave all the rest and residue of my property and estate, including any lapsed legacy, to my only daughter, Sue.

On May 10, 1999, Ted died in Harris County while on a visit there.  On May 13, 1999, Sam died in a tragic accident, survived by his wife Ginger and two children, Courtney and Wyatt.  Courtney was born on May 9, one day before Ted’s death.  Sam’s will left his entire estate to his wife. 

 

Bob survives Ted and has one child, Elizabeth, age 20.  Sue also survives Ted; she has no children. 

 

At the time of Ted’s death, he owned the following property:  (a) 200 shares of XYZ Company stock as a result of a 2 for 1 stock split declared by XYZ in 1995; (b) $50,000 cash dividends that had been paid on the XYZ stock and deposited in a bank account in Ted’s name in Harris County; (c) a $250,000 promissory note received as part of the sale price of the Harris County ranch in 1997; and (d) his residential homestead in Dallas County, which homestead is valued at $300,000.

 

Ted’s estate owes $100,000 in debts and expenses.

 

A.     To whom should Ted’s estate by distributed, and what interests does each distributee take?  Discuss fully.

B.     In what county should Ted’s will be probated?

C.     From what property should the estate’s debts and expenses be paid?  Discuss fully.

D.     If Bob disclaims rights to the $40,000 cash bequest, who becomes entitled to receive the disclaimed $40,000?  Explain your answer.

 

 

A:  http://capitol.tlc.state.tx.us/statutes/codes/PB000004.html

 

B.:  http://capitol.tlc.state.tx.us/statutes/codes/PB000001.html

 

C:  http://capitol.tlc.state.tx.us/statutes/codes/PB000002.html

 

D:  http://capitol.tlc.state.tx.us/statutes/codes/PB000002.html

 



[1] Review questions taken from the July 1999 Texas Bar Exam

1