Back ] Up ] Next ]

 

Email Archive Page 28

 
From: Mike
Subject: Re: An American BT
At 8:48 PM -0500 6/17/97,  wrote:
>And thus spake Jody...
>> It wouldn't happen to be "Lillies, " a Canadian film about a love triangle
>> between three boys in the 1930's would it?
>
> More info. please. Neither http://www.reel.com/ or
>http://www.imdb.org/ hat information on this film and I'm curious..
 
I haven't seen Lilies (that's how it is spelled in the promo below) but it
is showing at the San Francisco Lesbian and Gay Film Festival on Thursday
June 26. Here's what the promo says about it:
"Video-artist-turned-filmmaker John Greyson comes into his own with this
intensely cinematic refashioning of Michel Marc Bouchard's play *Les
Fleurettes*. The setting is a men's prison circa 1952, where Bishop
Bilodeau arrives to hear the confession of Simon, sentenced forty years
earlier to life for the alleged murder of his teenage love Vallier. But the
occasion is a ruse: It's really the Bishop whose confession Simon aims to
procure. Religious ritual turns into a play, and the Bishop is forced to
confront a past he'd much rather forget.
"Midway between Shakespearian idyll and Genetesque rebellion, _Lilies'_
cunning invention deepens Greyson's characteristic wit with great passion
and tragic betrayal. While the theme of romantic love resonates as
powerfully in the present as in the flashbacks, it's the visual design of
_Lilies_ that truly captivates. Elegant compositions and overwrought
staging dust tragedy with irony and conjure fantasy out of thin air. In the
end, the brave young Vallier's murder is made viscerally shocking by the
oh-so-decorative route its telling has taken."
I've heard good things about this film. It has been playing in some of the
theatres here but haven't gotten around to seeing it yet. But it doesn't
sound like a Canadian BT, much less an American one.
Mike

*****************************************************

Date: Wed, 18 Jun 1997 09:25:10 -0800
From: Mike
Subject: FYI: frameline.org (was: Re: An American BT)
At 11:15 AM -0500 6/18/97,  wrote:
>And thus spake Mike ...
>> I haven't seen Lilies (that's how it is spelled in the promo below) but it
>> is showing at the San Francisco Lesbian and Gay Film Festival on Thursday
>> June 26. Here's what the promo says about it:
>
> No wonder I couldn't find anything. It isn't on video yet.
> And seeing as I live in one of the (many) cultural backwaters
>in the Country I guess I'll have to wait.
>
 
FYI: http://www.frameline.org/index.html
Mike

*****************************************************

Date: Wed, 18 Jun 1997 14:48:28 +0200
From: jmc
Subject: Re: Pucker?
At 16:58 17/06/97 -0800, you wrote:
>At 8:08 PM +0200 6/17/97, jmc wrote:
>
>>Which reminds me of a doubt I still have, when Ste bangs on Rose´s door to
>>tell Leah to turn the music down, Jamie´s words are: "At a boy, Ste". The
>>Spanish dubbing says: "Well done, Ste". Is that correct? What´s the exact
>>meaning?
>>
>
>The Spanish translation is correct. "'At a boy, Ste" is a contraction of:
>"That a boy" which itself is a contraction of: "That's my boy": e.g., "I'm
>proud of you."
>
>Not being British, I hesitate to comment on "pucker" although in the
>context, Ste is obviously saying "I'm okay, I'm all right, I'm just fine,
>Don't worry about me." Jamie also obviously sees that Ste, as Shakespeare
>put it, "doth protest too much."
>
>
>Mike
I really love this explanation: "That´s my boy!", because if it´s so, Jamie
has another quality besides being absolutely adorable, he can see the future
too!!! :)
 
Take care.
 
Sandra.

*****************************************************

From: JOE
Subject: Re:
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 1997 16:39:33 -0500
> From: Keith
> Subject:
> Date: Wednesday, June 18, 1997 8:20 AM
>
> Kevin,
>
> You wrote...
>
> I'm hitting my 29th b-day this monday and have been going thru
> depression like you wouldn't believe...your note lust really made
me
> smile.
> Kevin
>
> Hey, How do you think I feel? I turned 30 on June 9. The big 3-0.
> Ugghhh, I feel so old (sorry, Mike, but hey, I'm entitled to a
little mid-life
> crisis now and then).
>
Mid-life crisis? Hey, dude, you haven't even _reached_ "midlife,"
unless you're planning on dying before 60. :)
Been there. Done that. Survived it. :)
Gary

*****************************************************

Date: Wed, 18 Jun 1997 11:08:22 -0800
From: Mike
Subject: The list NOW? (was: Re: News-group charter)
At 9:13 AM +0100 6/18/97, Gavin  wrote:
>At 20:21 6/17/97 -0500, Speaker wrote:
>>And thus spake David ...
>>> The list should be
>>> used when the matter is personal or private, and you don't wish it be
>>> publically available..
>> Maybe I'm just dense but I don't see why you would want to keep
>>the mailing list and the newsgroup separate.
>> If it's personal and private don't send it to the listserv. :-)
>>Send it directly to the person.
>
>No...there are some things I'd like to tell the people on the list, but
>which I don't think I'd put on the newsgroup for all the world to see.
I second that.
As I understood it, Davie's original intention was that the news-group be
more for chatting and shareing information about the film, actors, etc. But
that the list be a place where we can talk more openly about our personal
lives -- how the film has affected us, get to know one another more
personally, that sort of thing.
Let me see if I can find the original post....
On Wed, 4 Jun 1997 David  wrote:
<snip>
>I've also begun the process of creating a news-group which can far better
>>handle the style and content of the list as it has become.
<snip>
>Once the group is live all discussion should switch to it. My wish is to
>use >this list just for articles that you don't wish to be seen publicly.
I see now that I'm reading a lot into this. I'll cc this directly to Davie
to ask his input...Davie, what precisely did you mean?
 
 
Mike

*****************************************************

Date: Wed, 18 Jun 97 13:51:34 EDT
From: RG
Subject: Beautiful Things???
Just joined the list yesterday and thought that I would be getting info on
the movie and how people reacted to it, etc.
It seems that all I'm getting lately is personal mail and don't really
think that this is what this forum is intended for. Personal mail can
start here, but should continue through personal EMail.
To each is own, I guess. Just a suggestion...
Not being evil, guess I'll just keep this going for a while and see how it
all pans out.
PS - I thoroughly enjoyed "Beautiful Thing"! Turned all of my friends onto
it without any problem. It was simple, charming and the epitome of how
young love should be - whether it be gay, straight or whatever. A friend's
mother even walked away from the movie feeling great! Now that is
definitely a reaction that I'm sure the movie hoped to bring about!!
~~~ron
-------------
Original Text
From: Keith , on 6/18/97 8:20 AM:
Kevin,You wrote...I'm hitting my 29th b-day this monday and have been going
thrudepression like you wouldn't believe...your note lust really made
mesmile.KevinHey, How do you think I feel? I turned 30 on June 9. The big
3-0. Ugghhh, I feel so old (sorry, Mike, but hey, I'm entitled to a little
mid-lifecrisis now and then).Keith(At least I don't have to worry about the
next milestone for a while)

*****************************************************

From: Jeff
Subject: Re: Beautiful Things???
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 1997 19:39:32 -0000
This email list goes in cycles, RG. Many of the people who subscribe
have already discussed a lot of things, and will again when the subject
comes up. We've discussed matters so much that people complained we got too
much email. Have to remember this list has been around for several months.
Also, some of the discussion has moved to the newsgroup, per the wishes
of Davie and others.
Feel free to initiate discussions. And check the newsgroup!
Jeff
> From: RG
> Subject: Beautiful Things???
> Date: Wednesday, June 18, 1997 5:51 p.m.
>
> Just joined the list yesterday and thought that I would be getting info
on
> the movie and how people reacted to it, etc.
> It seems that all I'm getting lately is personal mail and don't really
> think that this is what this forum is intended for. Personal mail can
> start here, but should continue through personal EMail.
>
> To each is own, I guess. Just a suggestion...
> Not being evil, guess I'll just keep this going for a while and see how
it
> all pans out.
>
> PS - I thoroughly enjoyed "Beautiful Thing"! Turned all of my friends
onto
> it without any problem. It was simple, charming and the epitome of how
> young love should be - whether it be gay, straight or whatever. A
friend's
> mother even walked away from the movie feeling great! Now that is
> definitely a reaction that I'm sure the movie hoped to bring about!!
>
> ~~~ron
>
> -------------
> Original Text
> From: Keith , on 6/18/97 8:20 AM:
>
> Kevin,You wrote...I'm hitting my 29th b-day this monday and have been
going
> thrudepression like you wouldn't believe...your note lust really made
> mesmile.KevinHey, How do you think I feel? I turned 30 on June 9. The
big
> 3-0. Ugghhh, I feel so old (sorry, Mike, but hey, I'm entitled to a
little
> mid-lifecrisis now and then).Keith(At least I don't have to worry about
the
> next milestone for a while)

*****************************************************

Date: Wed, 18 Jun 1997 19:57:38 +0200
From: jm
Subject: Re: HAPPY BIRTHDAY, CHIK!!
At 23:33 17/06/97 -0400, you wrote:
>> >Hi everybody....
>> >
>> >Thanks to everyone who congratulated me on my b-day. It's good to know
>> >that some people out there care. And especially thanks to Sandra. I've
>> >been reading her posts all along and I just have to admit that you seem
>> >to be a very special und unique person to me. BTW, I didn't get any
>> >presents at all but that OK for me. My parents never gave me any
>> >presents neither on my b-day nor christmas. And I'm glad about it. Not
>> >the presents count (at least not the tangible ones) but the person who
>> >share the day with me. Unfortunately Matija wasn't there to join my day.
>> >But that's OK, too. I can't always get what my heart desires.
>> >Uhmm....I better stop now. I'm in this kind of Internet access point
>> >where they charge you money for using the net since my parents cut off
>> >my phone for using it tooooo long :)
>> >
>> >See ya later,
>> >
>> >
>> > Michael
>> >
>>
>> Thank you very much. It´s one of the nicest things I´ve ever heard from
anyone.
>> But all of us are unique. When I feel down or I consider my life is
>> worthless I try to remember that I´m unique. Consider: there are thousands
>> of millions of people on this planet, billions of stars in this galaxy and
>> millions of galaxies in the universe, but in this universe each of us is
>> unique and irreplaceable. We may feel insignificant, unloved and alone, but
>> we must remember that we are unique and there will never be another person
>> like us. It´s somehow comforting, to know that even if I´m a nuisance, I´m a
>> UNIQUE nuisance.
>>
>> Metaphysical, innit? But also true.
>>
>> Take care.
>>
>> Sandra.
>>
>> ____________________________________________________________________________
>> _______
>> "I´m very happy. I´m happy when I´m with you." - Jamie to Ste in 'Beautiful
>> Thing'.
>> ____________________________________________________________________________
>> _______
>_________
>Sandra,
>THANK YOU!
>I'm hitting my 29th b-day this monday and have been going thru
>depression like you wouldn't believe...your note lust really made me
>smile.
>Kevin
>"I'm happy when I'm with you"
 
You´re very welcome!! I´m happy it made you smile. That´s what are friends
for. I truly believe in what I said (it was the trekkie part of me speaking).
HAPPY BIRTHDAY KEVIN!!!
BTW, it seems it´s everybody´s birthday nowadays. Mine´s next month... :)
 
Take care.
 
Sandra.

*****************************************************

Date: Wed, 18 Jun 1997 12:06:16 -0700 (MST)
From: mesocyclone
Subject: Tony's character?
Could somebody give me a little background about Tony's character? My
friends and I can't make out if he's just stupid, or if he's a Uni grad
with no common sense. I mean, there are times when he comes across as
kinda smart (like the references to University Challenge, which I'm
assuming is like the US Jeopardy, and the constant "You shoulnd't use
words like 'bird'"), and others when he's just an idiot. So some of us
think he's actually pretty smart, he just has no common snese (all book
smarts), and some of us think he's just dumb. Help?

*****************************************************

Date: Wed, 18 Jun 97 20:35:40 UT
From: Chainarong
I didn't receive any new post in newsgroup today (does that mean something's
wrong with my system?). I still had that soundtrack by Jason and still don't
know how to donwload it. Any help?
Thanks
Neil

*****************************************************

Date: Wed, 18 Jun 1997 15:44:37 -0800
From: Mike
Subject: Did they or didn't they?: Interesting thread on new-sgroup
This was posted to the newsgroup from Kenneth . I know some of you
don't have access to the NG yet so I've cross posted it. I think the
question it raises is too interesting to be missed by any. What do you guys
think about this??
In article <01bc7ac5$5a0738e0$40809bd0@default>, "Kenneth"
wrote to alt.movies.beautiful-thing:
> Howdy group, thanks David...
>
> Have you wodered if Jamie may have gotten carried away from Ste being naked
> during the night. How many 16 year olds would resist having Ste naked to
> him. Although he denied any action during the movie, maybe Jamie took
> advantage of the situation.
>
> What are your opinions?
>
> What about Ste saying not in the flat with Sandra and Tony, oldman and
> Trevor next door and going to his deaf aunts? What were they looking for?
Oh, now HERE'S an interesting thread! If I understand you correctly, you're
assuming that Jamie and Ste DIDN'T have "sex". (I put it in quotes because,
even if they did in some sense of the word, we don't know just how far that
went).
All this time I've been assuming that they DID play around. "I'm a bit
soar," doesn't rank as a "no" to the question, "Can I touch you?" I also
base this on Ste's uncomfortableness, his not hanging out with Jamie after
that, and Jamie's confrontation with him at the party by the lake. What, do
I just have a dirty mind? I don't think so. Jamie's saying, "want to come
around tonight?" For what I wonder? I thought their denial of "nothing
happened" to Leah was just that, a lie.
As for the other scene where Ste gives Jamie the hat, well Ste is
explaining his uncomfortableness about having to hide what they are doing
-- even if it is a necessity, given Ste's dad. Haven't we ALL felt this
way? It's as if there's something to be ashamed of; Ste doesn't want that.
Who the hell does?? But what to do. Why do you THINK Ste thought of going
to stay at the aunt's who is death -- because she wouldn't HEAR them. Hear
what, you ask? :-o
I'd be VERY interested to hear what others think about this question -- so,
as it is in a public forum, I'm taking the liberty of cross posting this.
Mike

*****************************************************

Date: Wed, 18 Jun 1997 20:03:55 -0400 (EDT)
From: Head
Subject: Agent Update??
Just wondering... Any news on an agent for Scott Neal???
Jim

*****************************************************

Date: Wed, 18 Jun 1997 16:58:12 -0400 (EDT)
From: Thom
Subject: Re: newsgroup
In a message dated 97-06-18 15:42:23 EDT, you write:
<< I keep trying to get AOL to add it to its list, but nothing!
Jody >>
Same here, Jody..... have sent "suggestions" and emails, but nooooooo.
Grrrrrrrr.
Thom

*****************************************************

Date: Wed, 18 Jun 1997 11:33:41 -0800
From: Mike
Subject: Re:
At 8:20 AM -0500 6/18/97, Keith  wrote:
>Kevin,
>
>You wrote...
>
>I'm hitting my 29th b-day this monday and have been going thru
>depression like you wouldn't believe...your note lust really made me
>smile.
>Kevin
>
>Hey, How do you think I feel? I turned 30 on June 9. The big 3-0.
>Ugghhh, I feel so old (sorry, Mike, but hey, I'm entitled to a little mid-life
>crisis now and then).
>
Yeah, well, you can start thinking your old at 30 if ya wanna but... Well,
here's the thing. My mother is 90 years old. Try to imagine that. I'm
almost 50 and I can't. Anyway, she says, "My body's old but I ain't. I've
been the same girl since I was, oh, about 17 or so. Imagine what its like
to be 17 in a 90 year old body! (she laughs) At least I still have a sense
of humor." Of course she tells me this over and over because she doesn't
remember that she's already told me this a thousand times before. But there
it is.
The thing is, the spirit doesn't age and, ladies and gentlemen, it is the
spirit that falls in love (not the body). Yeah, the body falls in lust.
It's just like a dog. Pet it, scratch it behind the ears or on the rump,
make it feel good, and it'll wag its tale and come back for more. ;-)
But the "spirit" (for lack of a better word) is a much more complicated
thing. Hell if I know why I fall in love with the people I do. They aren't
all young and good looking, I can tell you that. Some of them don't even
treat me very nice. But I love them and they (in their various ways) love
me. Go figure.
I, too, struggle with this "getting old" stuff. Our society in general, and
gay soiciety in pariticular, is so fixated on the "pretty". It is very
superficial and we all know it, but we all (or most of us anyway) get into
it in one way or another. Hell, who DOESN'T like looking at a beautiful
young(er) person? I love younger people, their physical beauty, (I
particularly like the translucentness of young skin) their vitality, their
spunk and spirit. Sometimes young'ns make me nuts but that's another matter.
But who loves old folks? Their skin is all wrinkly, their hair falls out or
grows out of weird places, and they complain all the time about getting old
and that nobody loves them. (And who wants THAT!)
:-(
More's the pitty, that's all I gota say. Mom's right, you're as young as
you feel.
I have a friend who is approaching 70. He is a very sexual man and, much to
my surprise, often picks up very cute younger (20s ish) guys. No, we're not
talking rent boys here. They LIKE him. He's fun. He's lively. He takes care
of himself and ain't bad looking for someone his age, either. I asked him,
"what's your secret?" He said, "Well, I just make myself open and available
to the possibility. If I ask someone out and they say, 'But yer old enough
to be my dad' I correct them: 'No, I'm old enought be your grandad!' They
seem to like it."
!! :-}
 
 
 
Mike

*****************************************************

Date: Wed, 18 Jun 1997 15:50:31 -0800
From: Mike
Subject: Re:
At 4:39 PM -0500 6/18/97, JOEHARDY wrote:
>> From: Keith
>> Subject:
>> Date: Wednesday, June 18, 1997 8:20 AM
>>
>> Kevin,
>>
>> You wrote...
>>
>> I'm hitting my 29th b-day this monday and have been going thru
>> depression like you wouldn't believe...your note lust really made
>me
>> smile.
>> Kevin
>>
>> Hey, How do you think I feel? I turned 30 on June 9. The big 3-0.
>
>> Ugghhh, I feel so old (sorry, Mike, but hey, I'm entitled to a
>little mid-life
>> crisis now and then).
>>
>Mid-life crisis? Hey, dude, you haven't even _reached_ "midlife,"
>unless you're planning on dying before 60. :)
>
>Been there. Done that. Survived it. :)
>
 
Yeah, Kevin, you can feel bad if you want but, now *I've* got a midlife
crisis. Imagine being 49 and suddenly, unexpectedly single? It's a shock to
my whole system. Hey, you know how I'm dealing with it (among other things
like crying my eyes out)? I'm taking a gay men's Tantric Sex workshop this
weekend. No lie. I tell you guys, San Francisco truly is sin city.
You know what my sister said to me: "Michael, you were such a good little
boy and you've become such a problem adult." Got that right, sis. ;-)
Mike

*****************************************************

From: Speaker
Subject: Re: The list NOW? (was: Re: News-group charter)
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 1997 22:32:51 -0500 (CDT)
And thus spake Mike ...
> At 9:13 AM +0100 6/18/97, Gavin wrote:
> >No...there are some things I'd like to tell the people on the list, but
> >which I don't think I'd put on the newsgroup for all the world to see.
I guess to me there's no difference. There is no screening procedure
to insure that the people on the mailing list are friendly or receptive.
Most anyone can sign up and they can find the list bu doing a WWW search
on Beautiful Thing and hitting the WWW page. So ease/restriction of access
are pretty much the same for both mediums of communication in my book.
> As I understood it, Davie's original intention was that the news-group be
> more for chatting and shareing information about the film, actors, etc. But
> that the list be a place where we can talk more openly about our personal
> lives -- how the film has affected us, get to know one another more
> personally, that sort of thing.
I know of newsgroups where people get to know each other.
An advantage of a newsgroup over a mailing list is the use of a kill
file. So if somebody starts causing noise your nresreader can automatically
filter out posts from that person. You can't do that in e-mail.
> On Wed, 4 Jun 1997 David  wrote:
> <snip>
> >Once the group is live all discussion should switch to it. My wish is to
> >use >this list just for articles that you don't wish to be seen publicly.
Unless we're all using PGP encryption then everything on the
mailing list is public.
Just my opinion.

*****************************************************

Date: Thu, 19 Jun 1997 00:00:44 -0400
From: Kevin
Subject: Re: <none>
Beautiful-Thing wrote:
>
> Kevin,
>
> You wrote...
>
> I'm hitting my 29th b-day this monday and have been going thru
> depression like you wouldn't believe...your note lust really made me
> smile.
> Kevin
>
> Hey, How do you think I feel? I turned 30 on June 9. The big 3-0.
> Ugghhh, I feel so old (sorry, Mike, but hey, I'm entitled to a little mid-life
> crisis now and then).
>
> Keith
>
> (At least I don't have to worry about the next milestone for a while)
______
Oh!!!
PS "Happy" 3-0hhhh! ;P
Kevin

*****************************************************

Date: Thu, 19 Jun 1997 00:04:23 -0400
From: Kevin
Subject: Re: Another misplaced brit?
Sandra makes a comment in the movie about an island called Lesbian -
where everyone there is a dyke...could it be that deep-seated in our
genes is the call to the gay (albeit forgotten) island of England!?! -
after all, there seem to be so many of us on this e-mail line that feel
we belong in England...alright, my argument is falling apart - it's only
a joke anyways, right?
;)
Kevin

*****************************************************

Beautiful-Thing:
>
> So it seems that there are many of us who feel we belong elsewhere. I am
> also one of these. For a long time I have felt that I did not belong to
> the family at which I grew up with, however my curse is that I look almost
> identical to all of them. Unfortunately I have felt like I belong to the
> Brits, and have chosen to assimilate everything British into my little
> meager exsitance here in the States. Someday, when the funds fall out of
> the sky, I will leave this barren land go where I am drawn to. Until then
> I will endure life here and be happy that I am alive and intelligent
> enough to know about another life for myself. This movie has made me
> realize, again, of my misplacement and only encourges me to obtain my goal
> more.
>
> thank you
>
> Sean

*****************************************************

From: Chris
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 1997 20:41:54 PDT
Any of you who use the pine email system, prominent among US
Universities, have any problems logging on to the newgroup? I didn't.
I just typed A for 'subscribe' and typed out the name and it came up.
Anyone have a problem?
Chris
Houston, TX

*****************************************************

Date: Wed, 18 Jun 1997 21:10:34 -0400 (EDT)
From: JP
Subject: SF Pride Brunch
Any BTListers in the Bay Area, or any of you that might be in the Bay Area
for the Parade Jun 29th, are invited to my house for coffee, croissants, and
mimosas before the parade. (I live in a BIG house that's fun to explore!)
I'll open the doors at 9:00am, and we can enjoy each other's company for a
couple of hours before heading down to watch the festivities. Those who wish
can stay together for the day, or feel free to go your own way if you have
other plans...
Significant Others, potential significant others, and BT neophytes are
welcome.
Please rsvp to jp and i'll give you directions...
If you need a place to stay overnite, we can probably arrange something, just
ask me!
:o) jay
PS for a picture of my house, and other goodies, goto

*****************************************************

From: Chris
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 1997 21:03:32 PDT
Hi again! BT has been released here in the states for about a month
now. It is in most video stores. But to order it, it runs about $70 to
$90. Does anybody know if the US price will fall anytime??? I don't
want to have to buy a previously viewed copy. Help!
Chris

*****************************************************

From: Speaker
Subject: Re: newsgroup
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 1997 22:34:24 -0500 (CDT)
And thus spake Thom...
> Same here, Jody..... have sent "suggestions" and emails, but nooooooo.
> Grrrrrrrr.
Silly question but ever thought about changing to a real ISP? :-)

*****************************************************

Date: Thu, 19 Jun 1997 00:54:06 -0500
From: Fontenot
Subject: Mason?
Hey!!!!
Is there anyone out there named Mason who once emailed me, yeah?
Remember, David from Louisiana? I accidentally deleted your address,
but I DID email you a little something before that whole mess. Did you
get it? I'm still not sure how all this madness works! Hey, don't
make me out to be thick, I'm just no good with computers! I have to
tell everyone about this really strange dream I had concerning the film.
In the dream, I was Jamie (yet I was also myself; you know how dreams
are
fuzzy that way?), well, yes, as I was saying, I was Jamie/David. Well,
I was still living with my family back home and every night Ste would
break in and eat all of our food and sleep on the couch till about 5am,
and then leave. I knew he was doing this, but no one else could see it.
They blamed ME for eating all their grub. Finally I confronted Ste
about it. I said, "You can't keep doing this! You're getting me into
trouble! This is the kind of thing I would only let my best friend do
and she's not even in this country right now!! Please, if you care
about me, STOP getting me into trouble!" Then Ste would say, "You're
too young to tell me what to do! You're to young to be my friend!
And...you're certainly too young to love me!" These same events kept
happening over and over! I finally woke up crying. Psychiatric
analysis, anyone? Sorry about this, guys, but maybe some of you'll
think it's funny, yeh?
Love,
Miserable David
 
P.S. - Is London really home of the brash, outrageous, and free? If any
of you Europeans see my best friend out there, say hi!!

*****************************************************

Date: Thu, 19 Jun 1997 07:54:25 -0500 (CDT)
From: chakravorty
Subject: Re: your mail
I have also had problems with Pine.

*****************************************************

Date: Thu, 19 Jun 1997 01:04:40 -0700
From: "Eric
Subject: Re:
Mike,
In reguards to "Did they, or didn't they" (have sex).. I don't think
that matters! I think they author tried very intently to NOT make that
an issue. I don't think you have a dirty mind though. If your like me,
you have seen alot of gay people who have lots of meaningless sex, or
sometimes meaningful sex, and thus assumed Jamie and Ste had sex.
When I first figured out I was gay, I wanted very much to just talk
about being gay. (Not have sex!) I was too scared of that! So I think
when Ste talked about oldman Trevor next door, and going to his deaf
aunts, he meant he didn't want to get caught TALKING about it!
(ofcourse, he could have meant sex) But it would be much more romantic
to think they meant talking!
As to the other questions....
"I'm a bit sore" I definatly don't think he meant from having sex. I
think he meant from being hit!
"Can I touch you?" I think he wanted to feel close to Ste because he
loved him. If he would have wanted to have sex, he would have said "can
I have sex with you!".. After all, he dosn't really bit his toung when
he wants to say something to Ste..
About the confrontation at the party, Ste was scared as hell about being
discovered! Not because of what he "had done!"
And last but not least, "Want to come around tonight".. If you remeber,
it was already evening when that scean took place. Jamie didn't want
the night to end!! I had those nights! He wanted Ste to be with him.
To hold him! He didn't say want to sleep togeather tonight.
Ok, thats my point of view. I am a hopeless romantic and I choose not
to see thier love as sexually motivated. I sometimes wish I could be
more like that.. (I'm pretty close, but .... well)...
I am very glad the movie didn't show them having sex. Sex is only a
small part of being in love. Being in love should be a BIG part of
having sex, but always isn't the case..
This movie makes me want to fall in love all over again!! But it didn't
make me want to run out and have sex..
(Unless ofcourse Jamie is single now!!) :) I had to through that in as
a little joke!! :)
See ya!!
Eric (aka mavrick)

*****************************************************

You are visitor #

Last Updated on 10/10/98

This page hosted by GeoCities Get your own Free Home Page

1