Back ] Up ] Next ]

 

Email Archive Page 22

 
From: "Kevin
Date: 6/10/97 11:53PM
Subject: Re: The ongoing debate
 
Go GARY!!!
__________
 
>
> Mike  wrote:
> >
> > At 1:36 AM -0400 6/10/97, Kevin wrote:
> > >> DAMN, aren't there ANY more Romantic Gay Guys???
> > >Sure - but we don't live next to each other like Ste & Jamie... :(
> >
>
> > Now what we need are more images of us having RELATIONSHIPS. My god, what
> > do you do when the boy-next-door that you've fallen madly in love with
> > turns out to be a jock while you're a movie queen? What happens when you
> > move in together only to discover he listens to grunge while you prefer
> > "The Sound of Music"? What're you going to do when he wants a monogamous
> > relationship but you want to, uh hum, play about?
> >
> Mike, it isn't just straight society that hasn't given us models for
> good gay relationships, _we_ haven't set up good models. Or at least
> we've tried to make everyone fit certain models.
> When I was first coming out, I realized that I was different even
> _within_ gay society. I don't like opera, I can't stand most Broadway
> show tunes. I despise tuxedos and "formal" occasions. I do like Barbra
> Streisand, but Judy Garland was before my time. I never, never
> understood drag. Still don't, although I'm fully supportive of people's
> transgender rights.
> I liked sports, and lettered in cross-country and ice hockey.
> Etc., etc. Yet all the models of gay "lifestyles" were much more
> confining than I wanted.
> If all a guy who comes out knows about is the "bar" scene, he may go
> years (if not forever) unaware that there are gay soccer leagues, gay
> hockey leagues (with international competition), gay rock bands, and gay
> guys who love to wear jeans, t-shirt, hiking boots and love to go
> skateboarding.
> Sure, Jamie knows the entire cast of "Sound of Music," but he's also not
> the stereotypical "showtune queen." Ste is a "jock," but not the
> mindless stereotype either. They are both boys - real, but different,
> boys. And that is part of the appeal of BT for me.
>
> Gary
>
> --

*****************************************************

From: "Kevin
Date: 6/11/97 12:04AM
Subject: Re: Were They?
 
 
> PS: this could be an interesting thread. When did you (anyone on the list
> who is intrested in shareing) first realize you were gay? How did you feel
> when you had this realization?
>
> Mike
Hmm...I like Jamie's way of stating the obvious. (see previous e-mail
note) - Are you? Queer? Gay? I'm very happy. I'm happy when I'm with
you....
I say this as a preface that I never considered myself "gay" - it was a
label (with a very NEGATIVE connotation to boot) - I knew I liked guys
(since I was 12) I loved the way they looked, "felt" (though didn't have
my first experience 'til I was 22), thought, etc. But I liked girls,
too. Just not the same way - a friend of mine says I can appreciate the
beauty of a woman the way a straight man can!?! ;) Who knew??? I don't
know if I'll end up married to a guy or a girl - but I know I can be
happy with either - as long as I am loved for who I am

*****************************************************

Date: 6/11/97 12:10AM
Subject: Re: Were They?
 
wrote:
>
> You know, there are so many questions about them being gay!
_________________________________________
On the other hand...what does it matter if they are - they've got each
other right??? ;) But seriously, just knowing that these two guys can
convince us that they are gay and in love is no small feat!!! I am truly
impressed with their talent - God I wish I lived in England now - I'd be
signing up at the school they go to in nothing flat!!!

*****************************************************

From: Speaker
Date: 6/11/97 12:21AM
Subject: sjburges
 
Fellow Beautiful-Thing mailing list members,
 
Just called Blockbuster's 800 number (800-800-6767) to see
if any more stores in my area are carrying Beautiful Thing. When I
spoke to the operator and told her the movie I was looking for she said
they had been getting a lot of calls about that movie.
Looks like the word is is spreading.
 
--

*****************************************************

From: "Kevin
Date: 6/11/97 12:22AM
Subject: Re: There's folks like me out there...
 
wrote:
>
> When I fell in love the first time, I was in college. I had never met anyone
> that stirred feelings like that inside me. All that I could think about was
> him and being with him. It was very difficult at the time because I was
> comfortable with my feelings for him but he has very uncomfortable with his
> towards me and would not admit to them for the longest. We went thru a phase
> of experimentation and denial. (Such as Ste and Jamie) I remember vividly
> then first time we ever went to a gay bar. We were astonished. None of the
> people there were like us. We were far from the mold of the people that we
> met. (Even today, I do not fit the mold of the gay crowd - or atleast I
> think) To make a long story short, we are no longer together. Now when I
> go out, all I see are folks looking for one night stands and alley way
> blowjobs. I am no saint but I refuse to get caught up in this. Many of my
> friends think that I am crazy but I WANT LOVE AGAIN!! And I will not accept
> less!!!! Its been 2 years since I last time that I saw the only man that I
> have loved but while watching BT, for 90 minutes, it brings back all those
> memories that keeps me looking for it again!!1
>
> Jim
___________________
God, Jim, you just told the story of my best friend and I (almost) - I
met him in college - fell head over heals in love with him (though he is
still insecure with his feelings about men) - in fact my first kiss was
just like Ste and Jamie's (sigh) - we are still good friends - he lives
in Mississippi while I live in CT - we talk once every three to six
months or so - and usually about religion (it was a Christian College we
went to) :o - well, making a long story short (too late) when he
couldn't return my feelings, I vowed never to get hurt again and have
NEVER loved anyone since (that was over 6 years ago) - I have talked
with my mom (who is a pastor) about my being gay - and find I am SOOO
uncomfortable with coming out to ANYONE (I recently moved to CT and
don't know too many people - and I don't have time to get to the city
(NY)) - yet, BT (and these e-mails) also gave me hope that it is
possible to find someone to love - if I am willing to open my heart
again.
Well, just wanted to share that with the gang...
Thanks for listening
Kev

*****************************************************

From: "Kevin
Date: 6/11/97 12:26AM
Subject: Re: newsgroup
 
> I just checked the news server with my IP and found the most wonderful
> newsgroup: alt.movies.beautiful_thing! All right Daive!
______________________
Hey that's not fair...my IP doesn't have that newsgroup!!! :(

*****************************************************

From: "Kevin
Date: 6/11/97 12:35AM
Subject: Re: Real love, or : I *love* stirring up debate :-)
 
wrote:
>
> Well, now I've got some of you focused on one of the main themes of the movie,
it's good to see everyone pitching in and thinking about it.
>
> My previous comment stems from my deep consideration of
what was going on before we first met Jamie and Ste, and what
could happen after we leave them. I've been focusing on the latter
event recently, in order to produce for my own practice, pleasure, and
entertainment, a screenplay that revisits the characters three years on.
>
> My thoughts are that if they are still together at the end of my examination
of their life at age 19, then the love they have is that which binds two people
together for life - what I've always called True Love, and differentiated
from any other kind. This was my motivation for suggesting they
weren't 'in love' at the time we left them in B.T.
>
> During B.T. I feel they were in the first throws of romance, this being
apparently the first time either of the boys had been in a relationship,
not having kissed girls before (lucky them!). I suggest that Jamie's
feelings are initially motivated by infatuation, until Ste responds to his approaches.
>
> Thereafter I believe they were falling toward true love, but at that time
were experiencing the more lustful variety - combined with 'first-love'
as it is affectionately called here.
>
> Their feelings of tenderness to each other are plain to see and read,
and yes, to tuck you romantic dreamers out there back into bed, I do
believe that 'in the end' they live happily ever after. In fact, the more
I write the more I'm convinced of it.
>
> So the fairy tale is safe, at least for me. In fact if anything, I feel right
now that revisiting them three years on is the best thing I could have done for
myself, because it tells me that despite all the attempts by the 'scene' to
spoil their idyllic outlook, which would inevitably follow on once they
started going to gay bars, pubs, and clubs, Jamie and Ste would realise
that what the two of them have going is so precious that nothing can destroy it.
>
> Revisiting B.T. constantly runs the risk of making the subject stale
for me, probably more so because I'm living and breathing it day in,
day out. Getting a chance to see that even after B.T. the same dream,
the same fairy tale can still happen, has reinvigorated me tremendously.
>
> Regards, Davie
_______________________________
well, I for one am a big romantic and would love to say that Jamie and
Ste live happily ever after...but from what I've been reading (and my
own personal experience) I don't see a happy ending for them. My life
had many similarities to Jamie and Ste - but in the end (more like
_Maurice_ - good English gay movie starring Hugh Grant!!!) I had to go
on and deal with my feelings for someone who needed to be loved more
than he wanted to love me (or at least more than he wanted to be gay) -
sorry to rain on everyone's parade...but I see Ste could go either way
(if you'll pardon the expression) - he could end up realizing that he
does truly love Jamie (or at least loves men in general) and therefor
doesn't mind opening up to the world (I guess the last scene does give
that impression) or he could wake up tomorrow with the realization that
the guy he loves - who makes it ok for him to be gay - is no longer
right next door - but "dear ol' daddy" and "big brother" are...and watch
Ste dry up like a Raisin in the Sun (another good movie - but not gay)
;) - I just hope that you can come out with a sequel, 'cuz I'd like to
see what does actually happen to the two of them at the end of the
summer - a few years down the line - and at the end of their lives!?!
(How's that for morbid???) - Sorry! :S

*****************************************************

From: <Taiyed
Date: 6/11/97 1:30AM
Subject: website help
 
Hello. If anyone here has kept up with Scott's and Glen's televison roles,
could you please email me. Basically I'm looking for a brief summary of the
characters they played. Anything on this would be greatly appreciated.
 
Also, I wanted to add a section where people could share their similar Jamie
& Ste experiences. Email me if you would like to contribute to this.
 
thank you,
Taiyed

*****************************************************

From: "Justin
Date: 6/11/97 1:32AM
Subject: Re: American BT
 
Sounds interesting. Think it could be off to a good start. Of course, the
trailer park version is also interesting... I don't know. So many
options... What I don't understand is _WHY_ the American producers would
try to reproduce such a great movie. Would it ruin the reputation that BT
already has?
 
Justin
 
At 07:50 PM 6/10/97 -0400, you wrote:
>Well, I think an American version of BT is inevitable. We Yanks have this
>bad habit of copying British entertainment. :) So, with that in mind, I've
>been thinking of ideas for an American BT. I think a good title would be
>Lovestruck. (I don't know why I like it, but it sorta just came to me.) :)
> I was also thinking about music. My pereference would be a soundtrack by
>the Indigo Girls. They seem to have the same passion and warmth in their
>music that Mama Cass had in hers. As for the setting, that's where I would
>change things quite a bit from BT. I was thinking about the two boys being a
>bit further apart living-space-wise. I imagine one character as living with
>his mother and maybe a sister in a kind of upper-middles-class apartment
>complex in Manhattan, while the other boy lives with his father and perhaps a
>brother or two in the South Bronx or East Queens. Instead of going to school
>together, maybe they would work together at a restaurant or store or
>something. Well, let me know what y'all think. :)
>
>Mason
>

*****************************************************

From: Jeff
Date: 6/11/97 1:57AM
Subject: Re: American BT
 
> options... What I don't understand is _WHY_ the American producers would
> try to reproduce such a great movie. Would it ruin the reputation that
BT
> already has?
>
> Justin
 
 
Look at Birdcage, Justin. The Americanized "La Cage," which I really
didn't like. But see how it attracted a wide audience and made lots of
money... and set the images of gays back 10 years IMHO. Maybe an
Americanized BT would be good. If done right, of course.

*****************************************************

From: David
Date: 6/11/97 2:02AM
Subject: Coming Out in style...
 
My two-pennies worth...
 
At university last year, in my Industrial Applications class, I came out by
writing an article for the class to review on censorship and freedom on the Internet.
 
I focused on the threat to freedom of the round of news-group
witch-hunting that was going on because of the German Compuserve case, etc.
 
I signed off with the line..
 
"David is Managing Director of Digiville, an Internet ISP,
a member of the gay community online, and a supporter of freedom of expression for all"
 
Regards, Davie

*****************************************************

From: David
Date: 6/11/97 2:13AM
Subject: Glen and Scott and THE kiss...
 
Something else you might like to know...
 
In preparation for the kiss, Glen and Scott had a few shots of whiskey,
then, as Glen put it "we just went for it" .
 
*hick*
 
Davie

*****************************************************

From: mesocyclone
Date: 6/11/97 3:02AM
Subject: Re: Were They?
 
Actors playing parts: gay playing str8, str8 playing gay. It's just
interesting to consider. Well, gays play str8 all the time, it's part of
"passing". But why str8 playing gay? Matthew Broderick did it in Torch
Song Trilogy. And these two boys. Let's contemplate this for a moment.
Society has stigmatized being gay. It can be a dangerous thing. So play
it on film? It could ruin your career, cost you fans, etc, etc. And
you'd have to be pretty okay with it to play the part, right? I mean, if
you were uncomfortable with it, as Will Smith when he was filming Six
Degrees of Separation, you'd have a really hard time wrapping your arms
around another guy and sucking his tonsils out on film for the world to
see, don't you think? So either you're okay with it, or you're just a
damn good actor. I'm babbling. Bye.

*****************************************************

From: mesocyclone
Date: 6/11/97 3:11AM
Subject: Re: American BT
 
Yeah, I think an Americanized version would ruin BT. Look at what we
did with La Femme Nikita......

*****************************************************

From: Adam
Date: 6/11/97 4:21AM
Subject: Gay awakening
 
Kevin  wrote:
 
>:
>
> > PS: this could be an interesting thread. When did you (anyone on
> the list
> > who is intrested in shareing) first realize you were gay? How did
> you feel
> > when you had this realization?
> >
 
Hmmmmmmm this is an interesting topic. The first Time I realized I was
gay.... Must of been in Jr. High, I can't really remeber a specifc time
but I remember being fascinated with men, but afraid at the same time.
As a result I didn't have many guys friends, and the ones I did have
well, they sorta just drifted away. All through out high school i
relaized I was attracted to men, but thought that i was also attracted
to women, but for some reason I could never make real my feelings for
women. About three months ago along with help from friends, I came to
the realization that I was not bi, but full blown gay. It was hard to
accept, becuase all my plans to have a family wife etc...you know the
american dream, were ruined. But now I realize that I can have a
beautiful thing without a woman by my side... So all in all it was
pretty recent that I came to a concience descision. Well my two bits or
cents......
Adam:)
--
Adam

*****************************************************

From: Adam
Date: 6/11/97 4:22AM
Subject: Re: A truly beautiful thing
 
Kevin wrote:
 
> I think my favorite lines in BT are at the party when Ste and Jamie
> are
> outside (blah, blah, blah)
> Ste:"So are you...?"
>
> Jamie:"Queer?"
>
> Ste:"Gay?"
>
> Jamie:"I'm very happy. I'm happy when I'm with you."
>
> God, isn't that all ANYONE is looking for...someone to be happy with
> -
> to share ourselves with - to talk to - to BE with...
>
> I know I try to enjoy myself with my friends as much as possible
> when we
> hang out...but when the nite is over, I go back to my life and they
> go
> back to theirs and the "emptiness" inside just goes on and on...
>
> But when you are with someone who makes you happy, even when you're
> away
> from him (or her), nothing can intrude on the happiness inside - you
>
> don't feel lonely anymore!!!
>
> To me, that's why BT is so dear to my heart. It speaks of the human
> condition (wow, that was profound...) :) - the need/want/desire to
> be
> loved and the need/want/desire/ability to return that
 
I Love that line too!!!!!!!!1
Adam

*****************************************************

From: Gavin
Date: 6/11/97 4:38AM
Subject: Re: A truly beautiful thing
 
At 23:49 6/10/97 -0400, Kevin wrote:
>God, isn't that all ANYONE is looking for...someone to be happy with -
>to share ourselves with - to talk to - to BE with...
 
Too bloody right!
 
As Jay will testify: I was moaning on about this last night on IRC! Making
people feel all awkward, I was. But a funny thing about this group? It's
not quite like a group of divorcees having a go at Men: there is a
potential for people in the group to get together? Love to blossom? :->
 
So many lonely hearts...
 
 
Gav.

*****************************************************

From: Mike
Date: 6/11/97 5:08AM
Subject: Re: An American BT
 
At 8:47 PM -0500 6/10/97, Speaker wrote:
>And thus spake mesocyclone...
>> Okay, back to they've already made the American Version. I remember
>> reading this in XY a few months ago. It was a gay teenage love story
>> about two boys growing up in the rural country of Minnesota.
>
> Please somebody figure out what movie this is! I'm
>dying to find out. I'm going to try and do Web searches to see if I
>can find out anything...
>
 
I saw the film and I'm racking my brain right now for the title but can't
think of it. A friend of mine knows, so I'll email him and try to get the
title to you. Actually I didn't like the film very much. No production
value what so ever, the acting wasn't good and the screen play basically
sucked. Well, actually it would have been better had it sucked. ;->
 
There were so many weird things in the plot, it would be difficult to sum
it up for you. Basically (but this is really pruning it) two teenage boys
fall in love. One comes on to the other and the second freaks out. The
first, embarassed and heart broken, runs away from home to live in the big
city. He sends letters to his friend telling him that if he ever gets tired
of living at home, he'd love for him to run away and join him. Eventually
the second boy also runs away (with some help from a slightly older German
guy who drinks a lot). He meets up with the first who is now a prostitute.
The second becomes a prostitute as well but they are in love so it doesn't
matter as much. Things go down hill from there. Go figure.
 
True, this is an American film (although much of the dialogue is in
German), but BT it is NOT.
 
Mike

*****************************************************

From: Mike
Date: 6/11/97 5:21AM
Subject: Re: A truly beautiful thing
 
At 11:49 PM -0400 6/10/97, Kevin  wrote:
 
>God, isn't that all ANYONE is looking for...someone to be happy with -
>to share ourselves with - to talk to - to BE with...
 
Yes. I think so.
 
>I know I try to enjoy myself with my friends as much as possible when we
>hang out...but when the nite is over, I go back to my life and they go
>back to theirs and the "emptiness" inside just goes on and on...
 
Yep. Lonlyness. You need love and companionship. That's what David (my
lover) and I did for one another before he died in February. Our
relationship wasn't all roses, believe me, but we both loved the other. I
miss talking with him, lying in bed with my arms wrapped around him, him
giving me a little kiss on the top of my bald head as I work at my
computer.
 
>But when you are with someone who makes you happy, even when you're away
>from him (or her), nothing can intrude on the happiness inside - you
>don't feel lonely anymore!!!
 
Yeah. I'd almost forgotten what the lonesomeness felt like. Now I'm back in
it a bit. Mourning and all that. But, hey, I'm not going to stay stuck in
this pain, either. I acknowledge it and value it for what it is. But I've
already started to date -- a little. Very cautious about it. I'm in no
hurry. In my mind's eye, David is very close by. I talk with him about it
and he's okay with it. He WANTS me to be happy, that I know.
 
>To me, that's why BT is so dear to my heart. It speaks of the human
>condition (wow, that was profound...) :) - the need/want/desire to be
>loved and the need/want/desire/ability to return that love!!!
 
Hey, no problem being profound. That's great that you can see this. It is
such a gift to yourself and to us to say these things. That's why this LIST
is so important. We have the opportunity here to break through the lies, to
open up that Beautiful Thing that we are inside and let it shine. You'll
see. It'll transform our lives if we let it.
 
 
Mike

*****************************************************

From: Mike
Date: 6/11/97 5:54AM
Subject: To Gary and the list
 
Gary,
 
I can't seem to relocate your original post to quote, but you are
absolutely right: it isn't just straight society that gives us negative
self-imaging. Just recently saw the film "Love, Valour, Compassion" which
is about gay men and was a play written by a gay man with the best of
intentions. I didn't see the play but I've been told by friends who have
that it was more powerful than the film. Most of my friends like the film
but I had mixed feelings about it. There were a couple very good things.
Like in the first scenes where this very attractive man, Ramone, is
watching this blind man, Bobby, as he feels the bark of a tree. It was very
well done and quite evocative.
 
But I had a hard time relating to a lot of the characters in the film. At
moments I found them interesting and enjoyable; then again they really
irked me something fierce. I suppose this means it's a good movie as this
is how I feel about many of my friends in real life! But I'm not sure.
Where does it begin, the chicken or the egg? Are gay men the way they are
(and there are many different varieties) because we've adopted the roll
models we've been given -- or are we actually these characatures in essence?
 
The same question can be asked of straight people, by the way. Are they the
way they are because that IS they way they truly are, or are they just
being that way because they are playing the rolls they've been given to
play?
 
This relates to another issue that is being spoken about, how many of us
feel alienated by our own "community" of gay men and women. And, to the
extent that we do feel this alienation, how much of it is due to our own
internalized homophobia and how much of it is just plane dislike for the
games some of us play?
 
These are issues I've been thinking about and sorting out all my life. I
can tell you this: I know literally HUNDREDS of gay men and what surprises
me is their utter diversity. I can tell you without doubt, there is no such
thing as a typical gay man. I know young ones, old ones, cute ones, plane
ones, big ones, little ones, straight acting and bent acting -- everything
from leather to Queen Ann's lace, with some Prince Alberts thrown in just
for kicks. The ONLY thing they ALL have in common is their "sexual
orientation" -- and there's a lot of diversity even within that.
 
So, who ARE we, anyway?
 
Mike

*****************************************************

From: Gavin
Date: 6/11/97 7:29AM
Subject: News group
 
Urrrkkkk....
 
I got a reply from my university newsmaster. Correct me if I'm wrong? Was
it <alt.movies.beautiful_thing>? He tells me that:
 
1. No newsgroup control message has been received.
2. Even if one was received, it would have been rejected, because
a. One component is overlong (beautiful_thing)
--I haven't a clue what the legal limit is.
b. Underscore characters are not allowed.
 
Anyway, none of the newservers which feed news to us carry it: so either
they've rejected the name as illegal too, or...?
 
He claims that this is problem with a lot of attempts at creating alt.*
newsgroups.
 
 
Gav.

*****************************************************

From: David
Date: 6/11/97 8:14AM
 
Subject: News group and IRC DALnet channel
 
The name is alt.movies.beautiful-thing
 
Tell your admin to upgrade their outdated news
server if it can't handle current NNTP protocols and formats!!
 
DALnet:
 
Before we get it too established, can we alter the channel name please?
 
switch the underscore for a hypen? so instead of #Beautiful_Thing,
it is #Beautiful-Thing ?
 
It would be logical. I know, in reality that means a new channel
and you will find I've created one already - so can we start using
it so the current can fade away?
 
Regards, Davie

*****************************************************

From: David
Date: 6/11/97 8:31AM
Subject: Welcome to the group
 
The group was officially created at 01:32:16 on 9th June 1997.
 
Please read the rest of this article carefully, and switch to using
the group for discussions as soon as possible.
 
From today I will post my list articles to both, which means switching
to Forte Agent to write the combined articles/emails - I'll have to
forward an email copy to myself here in MS Internet Mail - confusing
huh?
 
I've been looking for it at Demon ever since and not seen it. It
transpired this is because Agent, the newsreader I'm using, was not
picking it up when I did "Get New Groups".
 
After an email from the newsmaster, I Refreshed the entire news-group
list and there it was.
 
For those of you unable to find it on your server, you might like to
try using pubnews.demon.co.uk. This is a public service port into the
Demon newsbase. Therefore it might be difficult to get a connection at
some times.
 
Demon have a policy of carrying EVERY news-group in existence, along
with EVERY article (including the binaries groups with attached
files). For alt.binaries.* Demon are currently commited to keeping the
last two weeks worth of articles in their newsbase.
 
The base receives and additional 4GB - yes Gigabytes - of news a WEEK,
and they are the premier uncensored newsfeed in the UK, if not the
world.
 
Regards, Davie

*****************************************************

From: Todd
Date: 6/11/97 9:03AM
Subject: Re: To Gary and the list
 
Mike,
You've hit on something I've been wondering myself for a long time. I
didn't come out till I was almost 27, and boy have I gotten an education
these last 2 years. One thing I think is true is that straight people in
our society are more free to be whatever they want to be. We on the other
hand have to be more cautious in how we present ourselves so we don't get
alienated or worse. That too changes with many factors I won't go into.
I scare my gay friends sometimes with some of my 'straight' interests.
Whether that is a product of coming out late or what society said I should
be interested in, I'll never know. What counts is that I know who "I" am
now and that is what counts. Part of my coming out process was the
realization that there will always be people that don't like me and I can
not please them all, so why try. I try to be just who I am. Like Jamie
says "It don't matter what I think."
 
Just more of the ramblings from:
Todd
On Wed, 11 Jun 1997, Mike  wrote:
 
> Gary,
>
> I can't seem to relocate your original post to quote, but you are
> absolutely right: it isn't just straight society that gives us negative
> self-imaging. Just recently saw the film "Love, Valour, Compassion" which
> is about gay men and was a play written by a gay man with the best of
> intentions. I didn't see the play but I've been told by friends who have
> that it was more powerful than the film. Most of my friends like the film
> but I had mixed feelings about it. There were a couple very good things.
> Like in the first scenes where this very attractive man, Ramone, is
> watching this blind man, Bobby, as he feels the bark of a tree. It was very
> well done and quite evocative.
>
> But I had a hard time relating to a lot of the characters in the film. At
> moments I found them interesting and enjoyable; then again they really
> irked me something fierce. I suppose this means it's a good movie as this
> is how I feel about many of my friends in real life! But I'm not sure.
> Where does it begin, the chicken or the egg? Are gay men the way they are
> (and there are many different varieties) because we've adopted the roll
> models we've been given -- or are we actually these characatures in essence?
>
> The same question can be asked of straight people, by the way. Are they the
> way they are because that IS they way they truly are, or are they just
> being that way because they are playing the rolls they've been given to
> play?
>
> This relates to another issue that is being spoken about, how many of us
> feel alienated by our own "community" of gay men and women. And, to the
> extent that we do feel this alienation, how much of it is due to our own
> internalized homophobia and how much of it is just plane dislike for the
> games some of us play?
>
> These are issues I've been thinking about and sorting out all my life. I
> can tell you this: I know literally HUNDREDS of gay men and what surprises
> me is their utter diversity. I can tell you without doubt, there is no such
> thing as a typical gay man. I know young ones, old ones, cute ones, plane
> ones, big ones, little ones, straight acting and bent acting -- everything
> from leather to Queen Ann's lace, with some Prince Alberts thrown in just
> for kicks. The ONLY thing they ALL have in common is their "sexual
> orientation" -- and there's a lot of diversity even within that.
>
> So, who ARE we, anyway?
>
> Mike

**************************************************************

You are visitor #

Last Updated on 10/10/98

This page hosted by GeoCities Get your own Free Home Page

 

1