**************************************************************

>Date: Sat, 12 Apr 1997 11:19:04 -0700

>From: Mike

>

>Holy shit, guys, look at this!

>

>

>http://www.cinemachine.com/dblookupa.cgi?beautiful+thing

>

>M>

>

>

**************************************************************

>From: "JOE

>Subject: American Video Release

>Date: Sat, 12 Apr 1997 16:56:06 -0500

>

> I checked with my favorite locally-owned video store today about

>Beautiful Thing. It's scheduled for release May 20, but they didn't

>plan to order it! They said they have to limit summer budgets on

>non-blockbuster films because that's when they have to have so many

>copies of the big, popular features. In other words, BT probably

>would have been ordered had it been released in the winter here.

> However, the price to the dealer for rental is $71.00 (videos are

>usually released first at what is called the "for rental" price and

>then made available, months later, at "retail price." Disney and

>others occasionally release both at the same time, but most are in

>these two stages.)

> Well, I want to show this film the fourth Monday in June to my

>summer film class. So they agreed to order the film and charge me $76

>for it. Hey, I'll net $1200 from teaching the course, so it seemed a

>small price to pay. Maybe I can rent it to others. <G> Then I

>realized that some gay-themed films remain priced at 59.99 or 69.99

>for months or years after release, so I might as well cough up the

>funds now. In any case, I'll have it in my hands by May 20th.

> BTW, if you're wanting to get your local video store to stock it for

>rental, they must order it from Sony Releasing (or whatever

>distributor) by no later than April 28.

>

>Gary

>

**************************************************************

>Date: Sun, 13 Apr 1997 07:23:57 -0400 (EDT)

>From: Taiyed

>Subject: Re: American Video Release

>

>Hello, I just subscribed to this list and wanted to say hello. After seeing

>Beautiful Thing for the first time I searched the internet for more info and

>I'm glad to see that there's a mailing list for this wonderful movie. I work

>at a video store, and we just got in the promotional video this past week,

>and I have to admit that its one of the best movies I have ever seen. Does

>anyone here know if Scott Neal is working on anything new?

>

>aloha

>

>

**************************************************************

>Date: Sun, 13 Apr 1997 12:39:48 -0400 (EDT)

>From: CARMEN

>Subject: Re: Dancing and IRC

>

>Ummm, folks? I think the worldclocks site may be wrong...because i was

>talking to Davie about what time it was over in england, and extending the

>invite for this afternoon, and fronm what he said, 6 pm GMT is 7pm Britsh

>time (Since they went to Daylight Savings time) which is 2 pm my

>time...however, it's 12:30 my time now, and the world clocks site says

>that its 5:30, so it looks like it's an hour off. The top of the email

>which shows the time *does* appear to be right, so just use that.

>Tory

>

>

>On Mon, 7 Apr 1997, Mike  wrote:

>

>> Thanks Tory! Translated into schema it looks like this:

>>

>> The next IRC meet will be:

>>

>> When: Sunday, April 13

>> 6:00 PM GMT

>> Where: irc.stealth.net

>> Channel: #btlist

>>

>>

>> If you're not sure of the equivalent time for your local zone, go to:

>>

>> http://www.worldclocks.com/time/

>>

>> The curent GMT will be displayed in the lower left corner of your screen

>> (you might have to scroll down a bit). If you're having trouble figuring

>> it out, e-me privately and I'll help.

>>

>> MW>

>>

>>

>>

>>

>> >On Mon, 7 Apr 1997, Jeff  wrote:

>> >

>> >> As for IRC, I missed the main talk Sunday, but got on later to have a

great

>> >> chat with Mike and Jason. I hear I missed Tory. Sorry! I'm sure we can

>> >> do it again.

>> >>

>> >> Jeff.

>> >>

>> >

>> >OK, let's see if we can get this organised *properly* this time...

>> >At 2pm EDT(Eastern Daylight time, which is what I'm on now..) Which

>> >should be 6pm GMT if I'm calculating everything right...it should be 11am

>> >in the San Franscisco Bay area (Hi Mike!)if you went to Daylight saving

>> >time on Sunday Morning, or 10am if you didn't...All those in North

>> >America between Mike and I, fit yourself in according to where you are,

>> >and if you're on Daylight savings time...

>> >As for the channel, Andi was on #Beautiful-thing at one point, though I'm

>> >not sure which server, since I couldn't find him after I got the

>> >message...and Mike and I were chasing each other back and forth on

>> >#btlist and #beautifulthing until we finally ended up on the same channel

>> >at the same time! I'd suggest that we meet on the irc.stealth.net server

>> >at #btlist with the Topic Beautiful Thing...since this is a relatively

>> >private meet I suspect, and we all know what btlist stands for! :-)

>> >Whoever gets there first can set it up...

>> >

>> >Anyone have any other opinions, suggestions?

>> >See you all Sunday!

>> >Tory

>>

**************************************************************

>Date: Sun, 13 Apr 1997 13:25:54 -0400

>From: Cory

>Subject: Re: American Video Release

>

>Taiyed wrote:

>>

>> Hello, I just subscribed to this list and wanted to say hello. After seeing

>> Beautiful Thing for the first time I searched the internet for more info and

>> I'm glad to see that there's a mailing list for this wonderful movie. I work

>> at a video store, and we just got in the promotional video this past week,

>> and I have to admit that its one of the best movies I have ever seen. Does

>> anyone here know if Scott Neal is working on anything new?

>>

>> aloha

>

>

>Welcome to our group! Ooh, I just had to say I am so jealous of those

>of you with video store jobs! Promotional copies, months early! And

>the rest of us are still waiting......

>

>Cory L. :)

>

>

**************************************************************

>From: "JOE"

>Subject: Re: Next week's meet

>Date: Sun, 13 Apr 1997 19:48:49 -0500

>

>> From: Gavin

>> Subject: Next week's meet

>> Date: Sunday, April 13, 1997 4:10 PM

>>

>> I got the tail end of today's meet, but the next one's:

>>

>> Sunday, April 20

>> 2100 Greenwich Mean Time

>> 2200 British Summer Time

>> 1200 Pacific Daylight Savings Time

>> irc.stealth.net

>> #BTList

>>

>> Gav.

>

> Whoa. Sorry to add to the confusion, but Central Standard Time

>(before the clocks changed) was six hours behind GMT. Now that we

>are on CDT, and Britain has moved ahead an hour, that should mean we

>are _still_ six hours apart. Therefore, 2200 British Summer Time

>should be 1600 (4 p.m.) Central Daylight Time and 1400 (2 p.m.)

>Pacific Daylight Time.

> Gosh, this is hard than figuring out what "stumpy" meant! <G>

>

>Gary

>

**************************************************************

>Subject: Re: Time Zones

>Date: Sun, 13 Apr 97 19:55:43 +0100

>From: Clem

>

>

>

>fun!

>catch it next time...

>

>

>love

> clem

>

>

>carbon life (David ) on 4/13/97 9:54 PM said:

>

>>I'm afraid its all too much (the time zones) for me!

>>

>>I'm SURE the worldclocks site is wrong! It can't even give me the right time

>>for where I live!

>>

>>How was the IRC session anyway?

>>

>>love

>>

>>DAVID

>>Brisbane, AUSTRALIA

>>

>>----------

>>: From: CARMEN

>>: Subject: Re: Dancing and IRC

>>: Date: Monday, 14 April, 1997 02:39

>>:

>>: Ummm, folks? I think the worldclocks site may be wrong...because i was

>>: talking to Davie about what time it was over in england, and extending the

>>: invite for this afternoon, and fronm what he said, 6 pm GMT is 7pm Britsh

>>: time (Since they went to Daylight Savings time) which is 2 pm my

>>: time...however, it's 12:30 my time now, and the world clocks site says

>>: that its 5:30, so it looks like it's an hour off. The top of the email

>>: which shows the time *does* appear to be right, so just use that.

>>: Tory

>>:

>>

**************************************************************

>

>Date: Sun, 13 Apr 1997 22:10:21 +0100

>From: Gavin

>Subject: Next week's meet

>

>I got the tail end of today's meet, but the next one's:

>

> Sunday, April 20

> 2100 Greenwich Mean Time

> 2200 British Summer Time

> 1200 Pacific Daylight Savings Time

> irc.stealth.net

> #BTList

>

>Gav.

>

**************************************************************

>From: "Donald"

>Subject: intro, CBW, etc.

>Date: Sun, 13 Apr 1997 22:47:39 -0400

>

>Greetings from Atlanta (am I the only BT fan here?). I've been lurking

>on the list from the beginning, but this is my first post.

>

>Like many of you, I was drawn to this film and saw it many times (11 or

>12), knowing it wouldn't have a long run (although a month is pretty

>good for an 'art' film), and knowing it would be a long wait for the

>american video release.

>

>Being a typical impatient american, I couldn't wait and ordered the PAL

>version from virgin direct (Good job I had that multi-standard vcr).

>

>Which brings me to my reason for posting. I just received a copy of

>Virgin Entertainment Direct's 'Crash Bang Wallop' mail-order catalog.

>There's a short article on BT along with a pretty cool picture of Glen &

>Scott (page 12). Has anybody seen that picture? Scott has rather long

>hair (longer than the british video cover even) and looks quite

>different. Just wondered, I haven't seen any mention of it on the list.

>

>

>just curious.

>

>later,

> -donald

>

>

**************************************************************

Date: Sun, 13 Apr 1997 23:30:50 +0200

>From: Meinolf

>Subject: two of us

>

>Hi Fellows,

>

>A few days ago I got a present from a friend.

>A Video.

>Surprised I was.

>

>It is a story of two boys. Schoolmates they are.

>

>Then it starts to be different.

>One of them has a girlfriend.

>But he begins to discover that he loves his friend.

>

>And the problems begin.

>

>The titel is "two of us".

>Does anyone know if this has anything to do with Beautiful Thing.

>

>Maybe it was an pattern?

>

>Has anyone of you seen the film too.

>

>How do you like it?

>I like it!

>

>Bye

>Meinolf

>

**************************************************************

>From: "David "

>Subject: Time Zones

>Date: Mon, 14 Apr 1997 06:54:05 +1000

>

>I'm afraid its all too much (the time zones) for me!

>

>I'm SURE the worldclocks site is wrong! It can't even give me the right time

>for where I live!

>

>How was the IRC session anyway?

>

>love

>

>DAVID

>Brisbane, AUSTRALIA

>

>----------

>: From: CARMEN

>: Subject: Re: Dancing and IRC

>: Date: Monday, 14 April, 1997 02:39

>:

>: Ummm, folks? I think the worldclocks site may be wrong...because i was

>: talking to Davie about what time it was over in england, and extending the

>: invite for this afternoon, and fronm what he said, 6 pm GMT is 7pm Britsh

>: time (Since they went to Daylight Savings time) which is 2 pm my

>: time...however, it's 12:30 my time now, and the world clocks site says

>: that its 5:30, so it looks like it's an hour off. The top of the email

>: which shows the time *does* appear to be right, so just use that.

>: Tory

>:

>

**************************************************************

>Date: Mon, 14 Apr 1997 08:33:03 -0800

>From: Mike

>Subject: Re: Next week's meet

>

>>Hello Gav and everyone!

>>

>>>Ummm... Right. Was past my bedtime that one. So...

>>>

>>> Sunday, April 20

>>> 2100 Greenwich Mean Time

>>> 2200 British Summer Time

>>> 1400 Pacific Daylight Time

>>> 1600 Central Daylight Time

>>> 0700 Australian Eastern Standard Time (21 April!)

>>

>>If that is correct, you have just attained "God" status :) That is

>>the way it should have been put - especially the Australian bit :) Now

>>I can pop in before work on Monday :)

>>

>>Trent

>>Sydney, Australia.

>

>Yes! Thanks, Gav, for bring some order to this muddle!

>

>That's irc.stealth.net channel #BTlist at the times above.

>

>

>Welcome to the list, newcomers!

>

>Mike

>

**************************************************************

>Date: 14 Apr 97 09:47:11 EDT

>From: "Harry "

>Subject: Philadelphia PA, USA, Run of Beautiful Thing

>

>For those Beautiful Thing obsessives (of which I am one) Beautiful Thing just

>started it's run in Philadelphia, PA, USA last Friday evening, April 11th.

>Originally scheduled for last November 1st, it got bumped! to this later date.

>It is being shown at the Ritz at the Bourse in Center City Philadelphia and at

>one other Ritz theatre, in NJ I think. The audience (quite hot! I might add)

>was quite taken by the film and applauded at the end. They couldn't tell me at

>the box office when the run is scheduled to end but groaned when I mentioned

>that it ran for nearly 3 months in New York.

>

>For those Manhattan denizens who never leave the City except for Fire Island or

>South Beach, Center City Philadelphia is only a couple hours away by car or by

>train from Penn Station, either Amtrak or NJ Transit to Trenton and thence by a

>connecting SEPTA R7 train (much cheaper and leaves from the same platform about

>5 minutes after NJ transit comes in).

>

>I also was in London a couple of weeks ago and just HAD to go to Thamesmead and

>take the 180 to the Gloucester. More on that later.

>

> Harry

>

**************************************************************

>Date: Mon, 14 Apr 1997 12:14:41 -0700

>From: Jay

>Subject: Re: Next week's meet -Reply

>

>Our chat yesterday lasted about 5 hours (maybe longer?). People

>popped on and off. Some were early, some much later. The point being,

>the exact time isn't alll that important, unless you've really GOT to talk to

>everyone at once...so, join us sometime next Sunday, if you can!

>

>>>> Gavin 04/14/97 09:50am >>>

>At 22:20 4/14/97 +1000, Trent wrote:

>>If that is correct, you have just attained "God" status :) That is

>>the way it should have been put - especially the Australian bit :) Now

>>I can pop in before work on Monday :)

>

>Very welcome. Now we just need someone to verify that the

>calculations are correct...

>

>Gav.

>

**************************************************************

>Date: Mon, 14 Apr 1997 12:52:13 +0100

>From: Gavin

>Subject: Re: Next week's meet

>

>At 19:48 4/13/97 -0500, you wrote:

>>> Sunday, April 20

>>> 2100 Greenwich Mean Time

>>> 2200 British Summer Time

>>> 1200 Pacific Daylight Savings Time

>>> irc.stealth.net

>>> #BTList

>> Whoa. Sorry to add to the confusion, but Central Standard Time

>>(before the clocks changed) was six hours behind GMT. Now that we

>>are on CDT, and Britain has moved ahead an hour, that should mean we

>>are _still_ six hours apart. Therefore, 2200 British Summer Time

>>should be 1600 (4 p.m.) Central Daylight Time and 1400 (2 p.m.)

>>Pacific Daylight Time.

>

>Ummm... Right. Was past my bedtime that one. So...

>

> Sunday, April 20

> 2100 Greenwich Mean Time

> 2200 British Summer Time

> 1400 Pacific Daylight Time

> 1600 Central Daylight Time

> 0700 Australian Eastern Standard Time (21 April!)

>

>Gav.

>

**************************************************************

>Date: Mon, 14 Apr 1997 16:04:52 -0400 (EDT)

>From: Thom

>Subject: Re: Next week's meet -- help

>

>In a message dated 97-04-14 15:19:05 EDT, you write:

>

><< That's irc.stealth.net channel #BTlist at the times

>above. >>

>

>

>Help --- I was hoping to figure this out by listening in, but, alas! even

>the time zone differences don't seem as confusing as how to get to the

>meeting. I'm on AOL (using Netscape 3.0, if that helps) and haven't got a

>clue about irc's, etc., or where to start to try to connect. If you can

>explain how to go about finding the meeting from AOL, please make it the

>"Dummies" version .... Sorry to take up time/space with this --- will be glad

>to receive the answer off-list, rather than take up more time or clog

>everybody's email in-boxes. Thanks muchly.

>

>Thom

>

**************************************************************

>Date: Mon, 14 Apr 1997 17:50:37 +0100

>From: Gavin

>Subject: Re: Next week's meet

>

>At 22:20 4/14/97 +1000, Trent wrote:

>>If that is correct, you have just attained "God" status :) That is

>>the way it should have been put - especially the Australian bit :) Now

>>I can pop in before work on Monday :)

>

>Very welcome. Now we just need someone to verify that the calculations are

>correct...

>

>Gav.

>

**************************************************************

>Date: Mon, 14 Apr 1997 20:33:21 +0200

>From: Ludger

>Subject: Two of us

>

>Hello to everyone on the list!

>

>First of all let me introduce myself: my name is Ludger and i'm from

>Hamburg, Germany.

>

>So Meinolf asked for "Two of us". I saw the film (i think it's was made

>by the BBC for the Schools' Scene series) in 1992 on the

>gay-and-lesbian-film-festival here in Hamburg. I was very affected by

>the film. And I think there are a few parallel lines to BT. It's just a

>love story between two boys, Phil and Matthew. Phil is still at school,

>Matthew has just left. And as i remember there is a

>working-class-background.

>

>I also read the film-maker had to produce a different end: first there

>was a gay-friendly happy-end, but the BBC didn't like it, so they had to

>change it. There was also a controversy about the film because it was

>intended for the schools' television - but it was broadcasted at the

>late evening.

>

>At least, the author Leslie Stewart wrote a novel, based on the original

>script (same titel as the film). I don't know if the novel is still in

>print, but the ISBN is 0-85140-750-1. The book was published by

>Arlington Books.

>

>Love to you all

>

>Ludger

>

**************************************************************

>Date: Mon, 14 Apr 1997 21:04:29 +0200

>From: Meinolf

>Subject: two of us - new distributor

>

>Hey Jody! mega :-)

>

>Jody wrote:

>>

>> You've got this film? Where!! I've looked for that film for YEARS and have

>> been told that the BBC never made it available for rental.

>It's not for rental, it's for buy! :-)

>Two posibilities!

>1st - You can have a copy if you send me a tape and your VCR plays with

>PAL.

>

>2nd - You buy it youselve.

> The distributor is:

>dangerous to know

>PO Box 1701

>London, SW9 OXD

>

>They have a varius Range of gay and lesbian films.

>The number of "two of us" is -DTK 101- price is: GBP 14,99.

>

>

>> I've got the book version, with all three endings written too it,

>> but I'm dying to see the original.

>Threeeeee endings?

>What do you mean?

>Pleeeeeeeeaaaaaas telllllll me mooooooooooooore!

>

>:-)

>

>Bye

>

>Meinolf

>

**************************************************************

>Date: Mon, 14 Apr 1997 21:31:29 -0400 (EDT)

>From: Helen

>Subject: Re: intro, CBW, etc.

>

>Hi Donald.

>Just thought i'd let you know you're not the only Atlantan on the list here.

>I saw BT seven times at the Screening Room and can't wait for the video.and

>despite the e-mail name, I'm Shane

>

>Cheers,

>Shane

>

>At 10:47 PM 4/13/97 -0400, you wrote:

>>Greetings from Atlanta (am I the only BT fan here?). I've been lurking

>>on the list from the beginning, but this is my first post.

>>

>

**************************************************************

>Date: Mon, 14 Apr 1997 22:20:28 +1000

>From: Trent

>Subject: Next week's meet

>

>Hello Gav and everyone!

>

>>Ummm... Right. Was past my bedtime that one. So...

>>

>> Sunday, April 20

>> 2100 Greenwich Mean Time

>> 2200 British Summer Time

>> 1400 Pacific Daylight Time

>> 1600 Central Daylight Time

>> 0700 Australian Eastern Standard Time (21 April!)

>

>If that is correct, you have just attained "God" status :) That is

>the way it should have been put - especially the Australian bit :) Now

>I can pop in before work on Monday :)

>

>Trent

>Sydney, Australia.

>

>

**************************************************************

>Date: Mon, 14 Apr 1997 23:29:44 -0800

>From: Bruce

>Subject: Re: intro, CBW, etc.

>

>

>>Greetings from Atlanta (am I the only BT fan here?). I've been lurking

>>on the list from the beginning, but this is my first post.

>>

>>Like many of you, I was drawn to this film and saw it many times (11 or

>>12), knowing it wouldn't have a long run (although a month is pretty

>>good for an 'art' film), and knowing it would be a long wait for the

>>american video release.

>

>

> Hi Donald, greetings from Sacramento, CA. Wow, 11 or 12 times, huh?

I'm impressed with your devotion to this movie! Actually, I probably would

have seen it that many times too but it only played here for about two weeks.

>

>Welcome to the list!

>

>cheers,

>

>Bruce

>

>

**************************************************************

>Date: Mon, 14 Apr 1997 23:36:18 -0800

>From: Bruce

>Subject: Re: Two of us

>

>

>Hi Ludger, welcome to the list!

>

>

>cheers,

>

>Bruce

>

**************************************************************

>Date: Mon, 14 Apr 1997 23:37:43 -0800

>From: Bruce

>Subject: Re: Philadelphia PA, USA, Run of Beautiful Thing

>

>

>Hi Harry, welcome to the list!

>

>cheers,

>

>Bruce

>

>

**************************************************************

>From: "Jeff "

>Subject: Tying Up Loose Ends.

>Date: Tue, 15 Apr 1997 03:09:51 -0500

>

>Exactly, Jay... It was nice. Even were joined by Davie and Andi at

>different points. It was a nice chance to meet others and compare some of

>our feelings and perceptions about the movie. A few of us have downloaded

>ICQ, a nifty program that alerts you when your friends come on to the

>Internet and lets you chat with them without going on IRC. Gav, Jay and I

>have it. If you have windows 95, you can download it from this site:

>

>http://www.mirabilis.com

>

>Welcome to all the "new" people on the list (as I am fairly new myself).

>We can be a chatty lot, so be prepared for an inundation of email when we

>get going.

>

>My most recent BT expedition was to buy a back issue of the Gay Times that

>featured a story on the movie when it came out. You can do that through the

>Gay Times web site. Or at least I think I did. Just hope it gets here from

>Britain now. But here's one for the Brits (or others) on the list: Which

>month's issue is featured in the movie? Or was it a fake one? Would have

>to be 1995, right, when the movie was filmed? I'd like to track down a

>copy.

>

>I rented some movies from Hollywood Video Sunday. I asked about BT and was

>told it's not a major release, so it might show up in Hollywood stores on

>May 20 or it might not. I'm banking on a locally owned video store to get

>it. Didn't ask at Blockbuster. You just never know.

>

>I see some still haven't gotten the unsubscribe down. Sorry that they have

>to leave the list. It is hard to keep up with so many pieces of email a

>day. But I like it. It's my connection to the world.

>

>Jeff

>

>

**************************************************************

>From: "David "

>Subject: Re: Next week's meet

>Date: Tue, 15 Apr 1997 06:15:16 +1000

>

>: From: Gavin

>:

>: Ummm... Right. Was past my bedtime that one. So...

>:

>: Sunday, April 20

>: 2100 Greenwich Mean Time

>: 2200 British Summer Time

>: 1400 Pacific Daylight Time

>: 1600 Central Daylight Time

>: 0700 Australian Eastern Standard Time (21 April!)

>:

>Thanks for that GAV!

>

>David

>

>

**************************************************************

>From: Ralf

>Subject: AW: Two of us

>Date: Tue, 15 Apr 1997 00:20:19 -0700

>

>Hi Ludger,

>

>willkommen im Club der deutschen Beautiful Thing Fans :-)

>

>Ralf

>

**************************************************************

>Date: 15 Apr 97 10:07:20 EDT

>From: "Harry"

>Subject: Two of Us - London

>

>The Virgin Megastore on Oxford Street, London, U.K. also carries videos of "Two

>of Us" and a lot! of copies of "Beautiful Thing" as well as a whole host of Gay

>and Lesbian films, many of which are British porn, which is surprising (to an

>American) in a store of its type. Gays the Word, a gay bookstore in

London, has

>quite a few copies of the screenplay of "Beautiful Thing". The stageplay is

>currently being reprinted. Both the Virgin Megastore here in New York City and

>in London are very pro gay. We have a high visability and they cater to our

>market with lots of product in very prominent spots. I've also flown Virgin

>once roundtrip from New York to London and it's become my favorite airline.

>There's something about an airline that is playing a Pet Shop Boys video in the

>cabin as you walk onto the plane that just basically appeals to me.

>

>

**************************************************************

>Date: Tue, 15 Apr 1997 10:35:51 +0100

>From: "Jason

>Subject: Re: two of us - new distributor

>

>On Mon, 14 Apr 1997 at 21:04:29, Meinolf  wrote:

>

>>2nd - You buy it youselve.

>> The distributor is:

>>dangerous to know

>>PO Box 1701

>>London, SW9 OXD

>>

>>They have a varius Range of gay and lesbian films.

>>The number of "two of us" is -DTK 101- price is: GBP 14,99.

>

>If you're interested, DTK's web site is at:

>

> http://www.scotsgay.co.uk/dtk/index.html

>

>They distribute an excellent range of gay (non-porn) videos.

>

>HTH,

**************************************************************

>From: Ralf

>Subject: Beatiful Thing Slang List now on the Web

>Date: Tue, 15 Apr 1997 11:05:13 -0700

>

>Hi folks,

>

>you rember the BT list of terms and expressions which I compiled from

>the great input of August , GW, Gary , Tony ,

>Simon , Rupert ?

>

>I put it on the web, so you may access it any time you need it.

>

>See ya

>Ralf

>

>

**************************************************************

**************************************************************

>Date: Tue, 15 Apr 1997 18:16:23 -0800

>From: Bruce

>Subject: Re: two of us - new distributor

>

>

>>If you're interested, DTK's web site is at:

>>

>> http://www.scotsgay.co.uk/dtk/index.html

>>

>>They distribute an excellent range of gay (non-porn) videos.

>

>

>Hi Jason. Do they only carry PAL format videos?

>

>

>Bruce

>

**************************************************************

>Date: Tue, 15 Apr 1997 19:01:34 -0400 (EDT)

>From: Taiyed

>Subject: screenplay

>

>Hello, I need some help. Can anyone tell me where I can buy the screenplay

>of BT in the U.S. I live in Hawaii, so I doubt anywhere on this island would

>sell it. Maybe a mail order co.

>Thanks in advance,

>Donovan

>

>