Homophobia and Anti-SemitismBy Paul Varnell First published on Nov. 5, 2003, in the Chicago Free Press.
|
|||||||
But clearly such factual corrections would have little impact. The hostility comes first, then “facts” are imagined or rearranged to support the prejudice. Does that sound familiar? It is now barely recalled that in 1998 Mahathir suddenly turned against his presumptive successor Anwar Ibrahim, accusing him of corruption and sodomy and after a flamboyant show trial had him sentenced to prison for 20 years. The charges were almost surely false, prosecution testimony coerced and perjured, and human rights groups protested the whole affair as politically motivated.
Far from being unique, Mahathir is all too typical. Most Arab countries are both viciously homophobic and obsessively anti-Jewish. Saudi Arabia lashes, imprisons and executes gays and not only prohibits Jewish (and Christian) worship services but has its government-owned newspapers print absurd medieval libels against Jews. Egyptian police conduct sweeps of gay cruising areas and entrap gays they meet on gay websites. At the same time, Egyptian government television broadcast an interminable mini-series based in part on “Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion,” a late Czarist forgery about supposed Jewish plans for world domination.
It is scarcely necessary to recount the arrest, torture, executions and burning at the stake of “sodomites” when the Catholic church held political power, nor the innumerable hate-inspiring sermons denouncing homosexuality and “sodomites” in both Catholic and evangelical Protestant churches. Even today the Vatican and conservative Protestant churches inveigh against homosexuality and are the strongest supporters of sodomy laws and opponents of gay equality. The reasons for the frequent appearance of both hostilities in the same person or culture are complex, speculative and deserve a column of their own. But here is a start. Most people seem to want to think that however they are is the right way to be — that their conduct and beliefs are true and natural for everyone. Both gays and Jews diverge in noticeable ways from the usual, the familiar, so people conclude that gays and Jews must be wrong to be as they are. And since how “we” — the majority — are is “natural” the others are somehow “unnatural” and probably malicious in rejecting the obvious superiority of our practices and beliefs. Thus Jews are an affront to Christianity because they do not accept the founding Christian myth that Jesus is a savior or messiah — or, in Islam, Mohammed the last and truest prophet. Since the truths of Christianity (or Islam) are so blindingly obvious to their proponents, they think that Jews are being willfully stubborn when they refuse to accept them as true and may well be motivated by evil intent to harm Christians (Muslims) and undo Christianity (Islam). In a similar way, gays are an affront to heterosexuals who cannot imagine that anyone can really have different desires from their own except by virtue of something unnatural about them or else motivated by evil intent to harm heterosexuals or undo heterosexuality. So mere difference is interpreted as opposition and then as a threat. This article is published in its entirety accordance with local, state and federal laws regarding unauthorized redistribution of literature |