Last Updated July 3, 1998
Tell Me About Kim
By Deanne Kearns
Editor's Note:
Kim's mother believes her spirit is still hovering about, waiting to be justified, or avenged, set to rest somehow. And, somehow, I felt I was being called to be part of that process, by telling a story of the real Kimberly Frazier, away from headlines, rap sheets and public opinion. Too often, we forget we're dealing with human beings. Too often, we forget that this person has left behind people who love and remember them. I think Kimberly Frazier may well still be here, trying to accomplish the farewell to her mother and friend that she was denied.
I've felt my emotions building towards a climax from the moment I met Kim's mother, two weeks ago. For the last two weeks, I've felt like crying at the oddest times. At one point, I was nearly done writing, but had just become emotionally worn out. I had to stop. But when I tried to lie down, the story would not let me go.
I'm still in something of turmoil even thinking about the issue, but the urgency is beginning to fade. I think Kim is letting me go, now. I hope I've done what I was supposed to do.
Three years after Kimberly Frazier's death, I wanted to know more about her. We've heard the record, read the headlines: Police officer kills woman; Knife wielding woman lunges at two officers…Shooting victim had arrests on 90 charges since '94….Woman had a long record…Mother sees police shoot her daughter…Victim's grandmother scrubs blood from porch.
Frank Lamere, a Native American activist, says, "You know, this whole issue of Kimberly Frazier has been reduced to one sentence descriptions; one sentence summaries by the press."
Let's face it, headlines are the lifeblood of newspapers. Headlines sell papers. And once the paper is sold, details are what hold the reader's interest. Note I use the word details, not facts. Is it any wonder, then, that one comes away with an unsatisfied feeling, simply scanning the headlines and the stories beneath them? Once the reader sees details about a rap sheet two pages long, he is no longer interested in the person behind the details. Immediately, the paper has formed an image of the victim/perpetrator for the reader. It is rarely a complete or accurate image.
It's not my intention to defend or condemn the events that occurred on March 1, 1995. What is so often lost in the aftermath is the fact that we are not dealing with rap sheets, 911 transcripts, and evidence. We are dealing with human beings, people with lives, fears, hopes and desires just like the rest of us. People who are loved and remembered by someone who remains behind.
"Tell me about Kim," I ask Kim's mother, Louisa Frazier.
She pulls out a battered album from the large canvas bag she has brought with her. We begin to look through the pictures and clippings.
"Kim was really family oriented," she says. "She had been drinking and drugging prior to a lot of this, but she went through treatment, and completed that treatment. She was just supposed to be getting a job that following Monday."
The picture that emerges as Louisa Frazier talks, and as I browse through the contents of her canvas bag, is one of a normal young woman. An active, athletic "tomboy" who attained a brown belt in Judo while in school; an intelligent student, able to quickly pick up her lessons with little to no effort; a proud member of the United States Army; and fiercely supportive and protective of her family and friends. She was 29 years old when she died. It becomes clear that there was a warmth and camaraderie between Kim and her mother. Sometimes, Louisa seems bemused at the trials and troubles her daughter found herself in. When Kim checked herself into the NAATC (Native American Alcohol Treatment Center), Louisa says "She called about three or four times within the first week, saying "Mom, I'm coming home, I can't stand this,"…one of the guys there told her they couldn't stand her, you know. She said 'Why, because I can beat you up?'" Louisa laughs and shakes her head. "He was a real wimp, I guess. I don't know, they just…clashed, I guess."
The picture the press painted of Kim Frazier is very different from the one I am meeting today. I read some poetry; look at some drawings Kim made. They seem to indicate a young woman with an introspective, sensitive side, not at all the knife wielding wild-woman depicted in press accounts. My gaze is drawn back time and again to her service picture, and pictures of Kim with her Army comrades. She is at ease, confident, upright and proud. Her mother tells me, not without some pride, that Kim was a Finance Specialist, and very good at what she did.
Kim experienced bitter rejection from her father because of her sexual orientation. As she grew up, her father was proud of her athletic ability. When it became obvious, though, that she was a lesbian, and comfortable with it, Louisa says Kim's father "just really didn't like her." "I'm not changing it, Mom," she told her mother. "And I'll never grow up and let anybody beat on me [the way you have been.]"
Through tears, Louisa tells me of a part of Kim's life that she kept secret nearly all her life. "When she was in treatment…well, she told me that she'd been sexually abused…and I couldn't for the life of me figure out who, and then after she died, I looked through her papers." Kim had named her abusers in her 4th Step and Inventory journals. Even now, still clearly shocked by the revelation, Louisa says she'd never dreamed anything like that could have happened. "[They were]real church-going person, and the kids all went to church. You didn't think things like that could happen there. She told me when she got out [of treatment]." She begins crying again, softly. "She talked about a lot of stuff that she never told anyone."
It would not take a degree in psychology to understand where some of Kim's aggressiveness came from. Her experience of being sexually abused as a child, and seeing domestic abuse as she was growing up, naturally caused her to become independent, and ready to defend herself. As the oldest of three children, she made herself family protector. "Kim was real straightforward, and tried to take care of things herself. She wanted to be a caretaker, you know, take care of us. If we cried, that was okay, but if she cried…"
Toward the end of her life, Kimberly began to seek spiritual answers. While serving a five-year sentence in prison, she talked to the chaplain, and took a bible study course. Louisa says she and Kim went to church on holidays. Louisa became involved in her Native culture, frequently attending sweat lodge ceremonies and other functions. Sometimes Kim would accompany her. "You know, people would say, 'Oh, it was her time to go.' No, it wasn't her time. I asked the medicine man 'Is it something that she did to cause this?' He said no. The night before she died, we were having pizza and cake, for some reason, and she said 'Mom, I'm going to put a plate out.' You know, whenever you're eating, you put a little plate out for the spirits, and she wanted to do that. I told that to the medicine man. You know, she never does that. Never. And here she [did] that night. The medicine man said, 'Well, she was preparing her own way.'"
Louisa believes Kimberly is not at rest yet, not until this matter is resolved. She tells me, "We were having her memorial…on that day, I went home, and my grandpa's room sat next to Kim's room, and the curtains were all tied up. Kim used to tie the curtains up like that. I said, 'Grandpa, did you tie your curtains up?' 'No, one of the girls came in here and tied them up.' I thought, 'Oh, really?' Because my other daughter, she won't go into the house, because I have a great big 180 lb. Rottweiler, and she's scared of him…I knew it wasn't her."
Our time is over, and Louisa picks up the scrapbook and clippings, and puts them slowly back into her canvas bag. The last moments of Kimberly Frazier's life reside in that bag: a newspaper photograph of a bloodstained porch, garbled accounts, angry accusations. I cannot take my eyes from that photograph.
Kimberly Frazier could be described as 'troubled' in some ways. In most ways, though, she was very much the same as the rest of us. No one will know what the turning point was that finally led Kimberly down this path, and no one will know if it could have been changed. But of one thing I am convinced, by at least two eyewitness accounts: Kimberly Frazier spent the last moments of her life on a cold, hard porch, with no one to comfort or aid her. For this reason alone, if nothing else can be proven wrong about that night, Kimberly's spirit may well continue to walk between the land of life and death until some justice is found. And, if only for this reason alone, we should remember Kimberly Frazier, in life and in death, as a human being, deserving of dignity and respect.
Let this star guide you HOME
Top
An Education
By Deanne Kearns
It was an education, sitting in Council Chambers, listening to the assorted men and women of God telling the Council, and the rest of Sioux City, that we are in bondage, immoral, inappropriate role models. Statements from the offensive to the ridiculous echoed in the City Council Chambers. Our life expectancy was dramatically cut in half, while our very existence supposedly spontaneously spawns the AIDS virus, and every gay in Sioux City was waiting for the ordinance to pass so that we could descend upon our employers, our landlords, and the hapless corner café, en masse.
It was an education in how hard people work at being ignorant. I'm not by any stretch of the imagination a naive person, but the blatant refusal to recognize facts stunned even a cynic like me.
It was an education in the etiquette of self-righteousness. If you have a Bible verse to back you up, you can point your finger at an upstanding citizen, and denounce him as irrevocably on the road to judgment and hell, towing the rest of us along behind him.
It was an education in bigotry. There, I've said the word; the word that unaccountably offends preachers of God's "Word". The fashionable backlash these days is to label the victims as bigots themselves, because we fail to subscribe to the same narrow, ignorant, uninformed, medieval attitudes as those who self-righteously wave a bible about at a civil function. Now we are the intolerant, we are the ones trampling the First Amendment rights of free speech, free press, and freedom of religious worship. Now it is not an issue of equal rights for all, but the right to discriminate, and to invoke Christianity to defend that discrimination.
I was not surprised to encounter the bigotry of the Fundamentalist element in Sioux City, but I was sickened, nevertheless, at the spectacle of educated men, with $500 suits and perfect haircuts, slaughtering the Word of God to meet their specifications. The heaviness I felt as I left City Hall on March 16th was not so much the disappointment of defeat. It was expected, in a way, but we know this is only the first step in a long process. We're not done yet. The sadness I felt was the sadness of knowing that my fellow human beings can be so blind and ignorant when the truth is before them; that they can be so self-righteous and in their own little parody of reality, they cannot see the larger world around them.
And it was the sadness, knowing that yet another message was sent to our young people, telling them that it's okay to continue to build walls of division and hatred; and telling the gay teenagers in this city that there really is nowhere for them to turn. How many young people's spirits were crushed by the spectacle at City Hall that evening? What are we doing to our children?
May God forgive us for allowing this to go on.
I Label You, I Label Me
By Deanne Kearns
One of the main pillars of Envoy has been the conviction that Community, i.e., the sense of fellowship, cohesion, and support we feel among ourselves, is the most important thing we possess as gay, lesbian, bi and transgendered persons.
The more idealistic among us, including this editor, like to believe that Community can and should transcend all labels.
The more cynical among us, also including this editor, tends to believe that, try as we might, we'll never get the hang of this Community thing.
It is in our nature to place labels on everything we come into contact with. It helps us break down existence into identifiable, easy to deal with bits. When our world is adequately labeled, we can then continue down our path, confident that we know where we are and where we are going. The problem is that while it is our nature to label things, it is also our nature to defy labels. We are each so unique and diverse that "one size" does not fit all. What works for one will not work for another.
The GLBT community has fought for years to break away from the labels a heterosexist society has imposed upon us. How ironic, then, that two controversies stirring up the community now really just boils down to labels.
For years, Joann Loulan was a respected sex therapist, and a champion for lesbian sexuality. Her books inspired us to find ourselves and make our own place in the world. But when it was announced, a few weeks ago, that she was in love with a man, and planned to marry him, there was a general cry of "foul!" from the lesbian community. Many gays, in general, and lesbians, in particular, felt betrayed. Some feel Loulan's decision makes the case for those who argue homosexuality is a matter of choice rather than orientation. Others resent the "heterosexual privilege" Loulan will enjoy when she enters a heterosexual relationship. Loulan has lost friends, speaking engagements, and the special status she enjoyed as a lesbian in the gay community.
Another cause of tension in some areas of the country is the boycott of the Human Rights Commission. Beginning in 1997, the boycott originated in New Orleans, and centered around HRC's seeming exclusion of bisexual and transgendered people, both in its mission statement, and its lobbying efforts. HRC's stand appears to be that inclusion of language to support bisexual and transgendered members of our community will only confuse and antagonize those who are already ambivalent towards gay rights issues. Let's get these measures pushed through, they say, then we'll go back and take care of our bi and tg brothers and sisters. Activists in New Orleans and the Gulf Area decided to boycott the HRC Dinner coming up in May in New Orleans. They are hoping that others around the country will support their cause as well. They have been chastised for causing division in the community.
There are other underlying currents to both these bits of news, but it all really boils down to labels.
We have fought so long and hard to get society to see that homosexuality is not just a matter of gender, but a matter of emotion and how the human heart finds its soulmate. We have struggled ourselves with the issue of how we fall in love and make the connection. There are no cut and dried answers for this, yet we expect our brothers and sisters to fall neatly into the gay/straight slots with no fuss or bother.
This seems terribly narrow-minded and ironic to me. Why discount the help and encouragement of Joann Loulan's books and lectures, simply because she is with a man, now? Why treat an important segment of our community as an embarrassment and a liability, simply because they do not slip easily into the gay/straight, male/female categories?
The greatest step we can take towards true community spirit is to set the labels aside, and accept and cherish the gifts and talents of everyone in the community, who has given freely and without reservation. A few months ago, in our first issue, I presented the concept of "yuimaru", the circle of community. Let me repeat here what yuimaru means for us:
We are all equally valuable.
We each have gifts and talents which makes the community richer.
We must respect and include all of our brothers and sisters in order to be complete.
Only when we find ourselves unified and whole, will we be truly successful in gaining acceptance in society at large.