to the L.Y.R.E. Home Page
to the Reports PageSample Report
Ass hole Fathers...
Their Roles in Homosexuality
My experience has shown that boys with macho fathers are more apt to turn to homosexuality as a means of "getting around the father." We are not talking about sex acts themselves, but the demeanor of homosexuality. It is impossible to say if the boys were already gay, or whether the father made them that way. I cannot read minds, so I don't know. My experience has been that all boys are homosexual until corrupted by the "socially correct" stage which almost all boys enter. They all come to the "fork in the road" where it becomes necessary for them to decide if they want to follow their wants and desires, or to follow the demands of society. Shall I please myself, or shall I please my peers, friends, parents, society? My experiences has been that about 90% of all boys haven't the courage to stand up to society, and "give in" to the pressures imposed upon them by society. They become what society wants them to be (in another article I call this type person a holoman. i.e., a person created by society)
At this stage (usually puberty) boys enter into a phase in which "getting a girl" is foremost in their minds, activated, of course, by their developing hormones, produced by their growing sexual urges , which is brought on by their growing sex organs. At this stage, boys feel (incorrectly, of course) that girls won't like them if they are the least tainted by the calamity of homosexuality. In all fairness, it should be pointed out that boys are not the only ones falling for this defective thinking. Adults fall victim to this idiocy, too. If the girls think a particular boy likes other boys, the girls won't like the boy. They don't want the competition, besides, if the boys have someone else to turn to for sex, the girls lose control of the situation. To put it crudely, the girls can't hold their pussys over the heads of the boys. This is partly true, but mostly imagination in the minds of the boys and young girls may fall prey to this way of thinking, but older girls and women love gay men.
The importance of this goes toward proving that homosexuals are made, not born. Which is in didrect conflict with my findings. One boy, eighteen years old, who appeared to be a perfectly normal boy, as regards being straight as opposed to gay, had a super macho father. Later in life the boy became attracted to other males, and apparently lived with one, or some, of them. This is where I lost contact, but I heard years later the boy died in a boating "accident." I don't know if the boy killed himself, the father killed him, or whether it was a real accident. But this boy was overwhelmed, actually cowered in his fathers presence, and actually slept in a neighbor's car many nights rather than go home. We have seen other boys cower in the presence of their fathers. Actually overwhelmed with fear. And the more they tremble, the more the father abuses them. The father terrorizes the boy, and then punishes the boy for being terrified. And, it need not be physical abuse but verbal. So the boy assumes, or plays the female role to get around his father. The way this works is the boy wants or need something, and has to take the female posture in order to get what he wants or needs. In other words, it becomes necessary for him to actually flirt with his father to get around the ass hole, figuratively speaking, he usually learns to flirt from his mother. He sees her getting her way with the father, or, avoid being battered, so the boy learns how to manipulate in the same way. Often, he too avoids being clobbered.
On the other hand, a father who is too weak and/or passive will have the same effect on the boy. The boy will turn sissy but for a different set of reasons. He sees it work for his father, so he makes it work for himself Maybe not. Maybe he learns these behavior patterns on an unconscious level. I have seen boys so sissy they had to sit to pee, literally, yet knew not they were sissy nor girlish. Many thought they were as macho as Charles Bronson or John Wayne. They did not know they acted sissy. Or girlish. The level of awareness in most men (girls, too) is pathetically low. They know nothing about others, nor themselves.
It seems a perfect father is neither macho, nor sheepish. Lucky is the man who performs this delicate balancing act, and lucky is the boy who inherits this kind of father.
I am convinced that homosexuals can be created, as well as born. This is an incongruity, I know, given that all babies are born homosexual, so how can one be turned into homosexual? This is thinking along the lines of paradoxical logic. One kind of thinking (philosphical? scientifically?) relates that all babies are born homosexual. The other along the societal (religious? Culturally?) line. In order to get to the bottom of things, it is necessary for one to think along several levels at the same time. Some people think along several levels at the same time, but don't know they are doing so. They are usually in mental hospitals.
A more sensible answer might be that boys are born with the capacity to become homosexual but usually don't, because of social pressure, unless pushed by some outside force or influence. In another article I wrote that the only requirement for being a homosexual is to have a sex drive, or the ability to have sex. This seems to be true. The same attributes that cause a boy to be attracted to other boys is the exact same quality that causes this boy to be attracted to the opposite sex. In both instances the boy/youth/man wants to be a woman. Men who want to be women fall in love with and marry women. Getting married is the only way they can fulfill their fantasies. In the case of the domineering father, the boy may not actually want to be a girl, but is forced to by the father, and since it works, he is successful, the boy continues in this way of life, simply transferring his techniques to other men. It gets him what he wants. And he is born with all the mechanisms for being homosexual anyway, i.e., he has sexual urges, and the tools for having sex, so turning gay is no great problem for him. He was born with the predisposition toward homosexuality, i.e., a sex urge. He was just lucky enough (or unlucky enough, depending on your point of view) to have his urges redirected toward other guys. And the redirecting is often facilitated by the father. Often street kids, boys, become prostitutes to survive. The question arises, are these boys gay from the git-go, or does exposure to repeated homosexual acts make the gay? There is no way to answer this question. A lot depends upon the individual boy, and a lot depends upon his former home life, and a lot depends on a million other things. So if you are a father, be careful about being macho. Your son may follow in your footsteps, and again, he may turn out quite the opposite. If anyone has a problem accepting that the father can turn a boy into a homosexual, consider the other factors that can accomplish the same feat: a boy who is born with a large penis invariably becomes homosexual.
Another factor that can make a boy turn gay is good looks. An unusually good looking kid attracts other males just as does a girl. In some cases, a beautiful boy attracts more boys than does a beautiful girl. The boys figure the girl has plenty of lovers, and they don't stand a chance with her anyway, so they don't approach the girl. But they do approach the boy because everyone is attracted to beauty. A beautiful boy will become gay regardless if he wants to. He is so overwhelmed by attention he really has no choice.
Another factor in this characterization is the beautiful boy's innocence.
Then of course, there is sissiness. A sissy boy will be turned out in 99% of cases. As will a weak, fragile boy. Or a timid, cowardly boy. They will be jumped and humped by boys who don't even necessarily want sex simply because the aggressor is a bully, and the weak boy is an available target. Many, many factors can contribute toward a boy becoming gay.
What the ass hole father never realizes is that a man who is too macho is playing a role just as is a boy who is too sissy. Both are signs that each is gay. Those given up to be the most macho men in the world, i.e., the motorcycle ganf freaks, are notoriously gay. They are pictured in the movies as being boy lovers, and in some cases, have their "boy" riding along behind them on their bikes. Another group of macho dudes were pirates, It is reported these bad boys raided seaside towns and kidnaped, not the women and girls, but the boys. They used these boys up and discarded them. The boys became pirates, and boy lovers, themselves.
The remaining 10% represent the ten percent most experts estimate to be the number of homosexuals in the overall population. I disagree with this number crunching by saying that all people are homosexual, they just don't know it. Those who practice heterosex are just repressed and have devoted their lives to giving in to society's demands.
This is more or less established by the fact that almost no one knows what or who he is, and by the below listed fact that all boys will turn to homosexuality for gratification and relief readily and eagerly until they are "broke" by society - using broke in the sense that a horse is "broke." I.e., his spirit is broken. All of which goes to prove that only about ten percent of the human race has the guts to be himself.
The men are less threatening. And women will marry a gay man in a heartbeat. So the boy enters a stage in which he feels he must be "socially correct" or "politically correct" and will do nothing to tarnish his manly image. Until they enter this stage, boys welcome homosexuality with alacrity and get it on with each other eagerly and habitually. When they "grow up" or develop the " social conscience" their virtue and purity become retroactive and they are forevermore clean as the snow on a mountain top as regards their past homosexuality. Like Christians, when they become "born again" all their past sins are "wiped out, " and from that point they can preach to others to "give up sin" and lead the good life. Of course, they use their definition of "good."
Which leads us to the conclusion that hetrosexuality is more of a social phenomenon than anything else. Some of the boys apparently were not gay, and would never have turned gay, had it not been for the insensitive father. Of course, there are boys who have been "turned out" sexually in the fullest sense of the word, by their fathers. I have anecdotal evidence of boys being sexually involved with their fathers, and I have seen it with my own eyes.
One gay man related how he had always spied on his father when the father urinated, changed clothes, etc., and was taken by the size of the father's penis. He literally fell in love with the gargantum (to him) organ, and wanted it passionately. The father noticed his son's fascination with the penis, and one day took the boy to bed with him when the mother was in hospital. He pretended to sleep while the son sucked his penis. The gay man who related this story said that the incident happened every time the mother was out of the house. For something like fifteen years, or at least, until the boy grew up. Least the reader suspect this is my story, I can only say I never had a father, nor a son. As for as my own first hand experience, I once wandered through a friend's house looking for my friend. I opened the door to his darkened bedroom and found him in bed being sucked by his six-year-old son. The light from the door made this possible. I withdrew quickly and, not knowing what else to do, pretended the incident never happened. In those days, there was no child protective service, and I probably wouldn't have called them anyway. It was not my business. If any damage was being done to the boy, it had already happened and probably had been happening all the boy's life. Telling people how to rear their children is not within my area of expertise. I leave that to the born-again bible thumpers. Morality and I are like oil and water. I have other examples of evidence, both anecdotal and eye-witness, of boys getting it on with their fathers. I don't know what this proves except that morality among fathers is similarly like oil and water. This is the best evidence possible of the old cliche that a stiff penis has no conscience. I have similar amounts of evidence to show the same deficiency of moral stamina applies to mother and son relationships, but this is old stuff. Like father and daughter liaisons, nobody is interested.
The father forces the boy into a subservient posture, though not necessarily intentionally nor knowingly, but usually, and the boy is forced to use these maneuvers to get his needs fulfilled. I know the father plays an important role in the boy's development, and the more macho the man is, or pretends to be, and they are all pretending, the more destructive the impact on the son. Usually the father doesn't care, because he is too focused on fulfilling his own needs, too full of himself. In most cases, too busy proving to the world that he is not sissy. The dumbest psychiatrist or psychologist in the world knows that a macho man is simply a sissy man overreaching to his own sissiness.
Just as a homophobic man is a man reacting to his own, or the fear of, his own homosexuality.
They go nuts. A good example of bilevel thinking goes back to the "hippie" days when the "flower children" were trying to convince the populace to live in love. They didn't know the Christians has been trying this for centuries but they ran into the same difficulties as did the Christians by virtue of the fact that they both had to live in the real world. There are people in this world one simply cannot love, nor can they love. The hippies didn't like this so the movement died a natural death.
I for one shed no tears in their passing.
Other males are attracted to the large penis, this was depicted in the movie "M-A-S-H" in which the entire camp gathered around the shower to gawk at the dentist's monstrous "tool" and one wit commented that "We have the best equipped dentist in the army," and there was/is no evidence the act of being attracted to a huge penis is a homosexual thing, but merely human nature to be attracted or fascinated by anything unusual or inordinately large. One friend of mine was so enormously "hung" that he could walk down the street and literally everybody would turn and stare at his crotch.
There was no way he could hide it, not that he tried, but it occured to me that everyone could not be homosexual yet absolutely everyone would stare at this man's gigantic piece of meat. He had 13 large inches. And this happens so frequently the boy with the whopper that he eventually accepts that he is homosexual simply because other boys (and men , and women, and girls) are attracted to him and seek him out. But the attention of the males is more impacting that the attention of the girls because the boys are more aggressive. If boys see something they want, they go after it. If a girl sees something she wants, she waits for it to come to her. And, as usual, the opposite is sometimes true, also. A boy with a small penis will develop "penis envy" and will be attracted to boys who have the large salami. The reason this does not always work is that some males are unconscious of their possessions. A boy with a tiny penis often doesn't know he is handicapped; just as some boys with a large dong don't know they are special. One boy I knew in high school would not have intercourse with a girl because his penis was so large he was afraid he would hurt the girl. I asked to see his organ and it was ridiculously small. Apparently he had never seen another boy's organ.
He doesn't know he is beautiful. Boys almost never do. Almost without exception, boys do not know they are good looking. Even boy models and movie stars wonder why they were selected over other boys. The reason for this, is our culture. Boys are not supposed to be beautiful -- only girls. Tell the average boy he is good looking or beautiful and he will think you are nuts. And a good looking boy when approached for sex by other boys almost always wonders, "Why me? Why does everyone want to have sex with me? Do they think I'm queer? Maybe I am queer." (I've got the name, I might as well have the game, etc.,etc.")
The only thing wrong with this picture is the ass hole father to whom the boy was born. This ass hole causes the boy to turn homosexual, then berates and reviles the boy for being so - in some cases, actually hates the boy and works very hard toward the boy's destruction - kicks him out of his home, cuts him off from support, denies the boy, refuses to acknowledge the boy as his son, etc. etc.
The French Foreign Legion enjoys this same reputation. So do career criminals in prison. The most heterosexual man in the world, who receives a life, or near- life sentence in prison, moves in and immediately starts looking around for a punk - sweet boy, lover. They learn about this way of life in county jail. One boy went to county jail and grew several inches taller there. He was raped in jail, and then joined the rape group. Before he left county jail he was convicted of rape of another boy and was sentenced to state prison. He and several of his buddies raped a young homosexual boy. The rapist was only nineteen. Many men juggle their lives between prison and the free world. The get out of prison and immediately commit another crime so they will be sent back to prison - to a life they love. Because in prison they are "jocks" or wolves. Men with a boy. In prison, they are homosexual. In the free world, they team up with some female so they give the impression of being "straight." Usually the female is a prostitute. She makes "her man" a living and supplies him with drug money by selling her ass.
On the street, some career criminals still seek out boys, but as a rule they play it straight. One boy I knew admitted that "on the street" i.e., not in prison, he went out with girls, but was unable to have sex with them unless another boy was present. He would "show off" for the boy. Otherwise he was impotent. They can put up with women for a short time because they know they will soon return back to prison, back to their beloved boys.
Besides, going with girls is politically correct. In prison they claim they have a boy because there is no other way. Some men even have a wife and family in the free world. In prison, they have a boy. Judging from some of the wives I have seen, it is easy to understand why. It seems that in almost all areas of life in which there are only males, athletics, military, boys schools, boys camps, etc., even the Boy Scouts, a high incidence of homosexuality exists. I would venture to say that almost no Boy Scout goes through the Scouts unscathed. They don't dare disclose their encounters because it would mean getting kicked out or pulled out of the Scouts. Or worse, losing their lovers. Even religious orders fall prey to the attractiveness of young boys who enter the setting. The ususal initiation rite for boys entering the monastery, or whatever, is to give up butt to everyone. Of course, sooner or later they learn to love it. And subsequently prey upon the next neophyte who enters the group. Or decide upon a lover within the group. Of course, we all know of entire nations and cultures that indulged in pederasty - ancient Rome and Greece immediately come to mind, but these two nations were not the only nations that indulged in love for boys. Point is, if an entire nation can be occupied with boy love, why should it be difficult to accept that a subculture can do the same? Facts like this leads one to the conclusion that in life, homosexuality is more the norm than the unusual. Were it not for organized religion, homosexuality would still be the norm, and bisexuality and heterosexuality would be the novelty. Of course, organized religion has screwed up everything else in the world, so why not our sex lives? Have we answered the question as to whether homosexuals are made or born? No. There is no answer to this question because, 1.) Every homosexual is so for a different reason, and, 2.) No statistics can be derived because no facts are available regarding homosexuals -- the researchers have to information other that the information given them by homosexuals, and this information is totally unreliable because homosexuals know less about themselves than any other group. They, like others, cannot analyze themselves. And, 3.) The question should never have been asked in the first place. "Why" homosexuals are that way is totally irrelevant. It means nothing. They are homosexual and the why is unimportant. Not valid.
One might as well ask," Why are you blue eyed?" This report is devoted to showing that macho fathers play an important role in the boys homosexuality. Did he cause it? Who knows. If he didn't cause it, he certainly played a major role.
