Subject: Gulf cleanup
April 8, 1997
The Nation
editorial

Gulf of Thailand desperately needs clean-up

   How appropriate that the one major body of water named after our country is a
   total environmental mess. The Gulf of Thailand's fish stocks are seriously
   depleted, its coral reefs degraded and mangrove forests denuded. What's more,
   it must absorb immense quantities of toxic and organic filth.

   The gulf has become a gigantic septic tank, and since it is a relatively
   shallow and enclosed body of water, it cannot take much more abuse.

   The Thai government's attitude toward these problems has largely been one of,
   ''out of sight, out of mind". There are now signs of a change, particularly
   with the recent creation of a Gulf Rehabilitation Office, but cleaning it up
   will take a lot of coordination among Thai government agencies and the
   countries surrounding it.

   Managing the gulf's fisheries sustainably is probably the most urgent priority.
   Protecting the mangrove forests and coral reefs which serve as the breeding and
   feeding grounds for fish and other marine animals is equally important. But the
   benefits of such programmes will be much reduced unless greater attention is
   paid to the pollution we pour into the gulf. How ironic if we have more fish in
   the future, but find they are too toxic to eat.

   This issue is only beginning to be discussed. Researchers have recently found,
   for instance, that a chemical known as TBT, which is used in marine paints to
   keep the hulls of ships free of clinging organisms, has been leaking into the
   sea and seriously affecting shellfish populations around major shipping lanes.
   In some species, the tin-based compound has the bizarre effect of causing a
   change in gender, preventing reproduction. In others, it can damage the animals
   or simply kill off the larvae. The long-term results are the same: a drastic
   decline in shellfish populations, and severe damage to the marine ecosystem.

   Fixing the problem will not be easy, as ships from all over the world come to
   call at Thailand's ports. But the Harbour Department could at least start by
   enforcing the rules of the Marpol Convention: banning the use of TBT on small
   boats and regulating the contents of marine paints.

   Cadmium contamination is another major problem. This toxic heavy metal is
   turning up in high concentrations in many fish species and has caused at least
   one foreign country, Italy, to reject some Thai fishery export shipments. No
   one knows the source of the pollution ­ fertiliser or industrial runoff are two
   likely possibilities ­ but it's time to find out.

   Greater attention has been paid to what may be the most dangerous pollutant,
   mercury, and the role of natural gas producers Unocal and Total in disch arging
   this neurotoxin into the gulf. Public exposure has helped spur them to tackle
   this problem more urgently, but keep in mind that we largely depend on the oil
   companies to monitor their own activities, and tell us the results.

   There are also many other sources for the mercury (and other dangerous
   chemicals) found in the gulf which have yet to be revealed, particularly on the
   Eastern Seaboard. Some state agencies ­ the Harbour Department, the Department
   of Mineral Resources, the Fisheries Department, and the Food and Drug
   Administration (FDA) ­ may have information on these contaminants, but they are
   not talking to each other, much less the public. Their negligence borders on
   the criminal.

   The Pollution Control Department may yet become the independent auditor we so
   desperately need, but it still lacks the budget, manpower and equipment to do
   the job thoroughly. In the meantime, industry is expanding, not just in
   Thailand but around the gulf. We all have to sound the alarm now, using our
   power as consumers, as voters and custodians of the planet.

   Will the gulf that bears our name become a toxic pond, or a sea of abundance?
   The next few years should tell us the answer.
  1