Subject: Flooding and Kaeng Sua Ten
[Note: this is how the story was originally written, prior to a copy editing mistake which has been corrected]
The Nation
Thurs, Feb 6, 1987

Doubts cast over benefits of Kaeng Sua Ten project

   JAMES FAHN,  PENNAPA HONGTHONG

   THE annual flood prevention benefits of the proposed Bt4.8 billion
   Kaeng Sua Ten dam would amount to only Bt3.2 million per year,
   according to a study carried out by the United Nations Food and
   Agriculture Organisation (FAO).

   Although several politicians have touted the project for its ability
   to prevent floods in some northern provinces, the report notes that
   it would have only a limited impact on flooding, which is also caused by
   rivers downstream of the proposed dam site.

   On Tuesday a hydrological engineer proposed a series of small-scale
   water management projects which would be ''more efficient and
   cheaper" than the Kaeng Sua Ten dam.

   Prakob Wirojanagud, director of Khon Kaen University's Institute of
   Water Resources Research, said construction of weirs and small
   reservoirs on the Yom River and its tributaries would cost only Bt1.3
   billion, less than a third of the cost of the dam.

   An economist at the World Bank also suggested that the Kaeng Sua Ten
   dam would do more economic harm than good to farmers, as major
   beneficiaries of the dam would be industries, golf courses and
   tourist resorts.

   Phillip Annez, former director of the World Bank's Thailand office,
   said if the dam is built, fees for water use would have to be
   collected from industries and businesses, because poor farmers would
   see their water sources taken away by the project.

   ''One has to wonder if it is acceptable to provide free water to golf
   courses and resorts, let alone to industries, who may pollute water
   used by poor farmers downstream," Annez was quoted as saying by
   fellow economist Jarik Tingsapat of Chulalongkorn University.

   Prakob proposed that 901 small reservoirs be built in Phrae as well
   as another 837 in Sukhothai. Collectively, the reservoirs would be able
   to hold the same amount of water as the Kaeng Sua Ten dam, but the
   smaller reservoirs would be able to distribute water to a wider area
   than the dam, he said.

   ''The Royal Irrigation Department [RID] has only considered a big
   reservoir. They don't understand that water resource management
   should not be centralised, as villagers in different areas have different
   water needs," he said.

   Speaking at a seminar organised by Chulalongkorn University's
   Political Economics Centre, Prakob added that the small reservoirs
   would have less social and ecological impact than the dam because
   there would be no need to resettle communities or submerge forests.

   The engineer also downplayed the potential of the Kaeng Sua Ten dam
   to control floods. ''The main problem concerning floods in Thailand
   comes from the lack of proper water management, not from the lack of dams.
   We built many big dams in the past, and they all failed to control
   floods," he insisted.

   The FAO study, carried out in 1991 by the UN agency's Investment
   Centre for the World Bank, estimated that flood prevention would
   account for only three per cent of the project's overall benefits,
   most of which would be derived from increased irrigation for
   agriculture. The World Bank later decided against funding the
   project.

   ''The flood protection benefit correlates only with projected crop
   damage prevention in the Phrae floodplain between the Ngao-Yom
   confluence and Denchai district," states the report.

   ''For areas further downstream, flooding is influenced not only by
   the Mae Yom River but also by its tributaries and, below Sukhothai, by
   the Nan River, which makes it difficult to assess the direct impact
   attributable to the project."

   Further details on the study's flooding estimates were not available
   because the report, entitled Kaeng Sua Ten Agricultural Dam Project:
   Interim Preparation Report, is considered confidential.

   Only a few sections were obtained by The Nation, and officials at the
   FAO's office in Bangkok said permission from the agency's
   headquarters in Rome was needed before the report could be released to the public.

   Speaking at the seminar, Prakob added that Khon Kaen University had
   submitted a small-scale water resource development plan to the
   Interior Ministry's Local Administrative Department for use as a
   country-wide irrigation management plan. The whole project was
   estimated to cost about Bt80 billion.

   However, Siripong Hangsapruek, director of the Royal Irrigation
   Department's Project Planning Division, said he believed the cost of
   the small-scale development project would be higher than Bt1.3
   billion.
 
  1