Subject: Moh Boonsong
The Nation,
Sunday, Feb 9, 1997

Boonsong's admirers to pay homage today

   Doctor Boonsong Lekagul was different from other wilderness lovers of
   his generation because he fought tooth and nail to protect it. Today
   is the third anniversary of his death  and Thailand sorely needs more
   people like him, writes Nantiya Tangwisutijit.

   BOONSONG Lekagul was a doctor of medicine by profession and a nature
   photographer, painter, film maker, author and teacher. But he is best
   remembered as Thailand's first conservationist and, perhaps, boldest
   lobbyist.

   He talked about conservation and the wise use of natural resources
   while the rest of the country flowed into the turbulent stream of
   post World War II development for fast cash.

   He was convinced that the only way of saving the country's shrinking
   forests was to take the warning directly to the most powerful
   political figures.

   Days before his meeting with then prime minister Field Marshal Sarit
   Thanarat, the one-man ruler of a dictatorial government, Boonsong had
   bid farewell to his wife and five children.

   He thought he had little chance of returning to them if the concerns
   he raised upset Sarit.

   Fortunately, the prime minister was convinced. Boonsong then arranged
   a helicopter trip for him to observe degradation in parts of Khao Yai
   forest. In 1960 and 1961 two unprecedented conservation laws, the
   Wildlife Conservation and Protection Act and the National Park Act,
   were approved by Parliament.

   A year later Khao Yai, the watershed forest of the Northeast, was
   declared the country's first national park.

   Boonsong wrote in one of his books that the night before the
   declaration, the government asked him to mark out its boundaries on a
   map  and he intentionally included a part of his own property within
   the park.

   Today is the third anniversary of Boonsong's departure from this
   world at the age of 85. A grand commemoration is being held at the Thailand
   Cultural Centre.

   The overwhelming ''yes" response to the invitations sent out by the
   Wildlife Fund Thailand (WFT), founded by Boonsong, is an indication
   that the conservationist-doctor is still dearly remembered and
   admired by those who learnt about conservation from him, either directly or
   indirectly.

   But today's event also has a hidden message, according to the WFT's
   Prayong Attachak: that the country is in need of more people like
   Boonsong, who not only studied wildlife for his own pleasure but did
   everything he could to save them and their habitats. In his 70s, the
   doctor was a vocal opponent of the proposed Nam Choan hydro-electric
   dam, which was to be built in the heart of Thung Yai Naresuan
   Wildlife Sanctuary.

   He knew that one of the country's best remaining wildernesses, the
   habitat of many large mammals and other wildlife species and the home
   of many indigenous tribal communities, would be forever submerged.

   He wrote a letter to the government of Gen Prem Tinsulanonda in 1982
   warning that Thai people do not live on electricity but on the
   fertility of natural resources. The doctor explained that his concern
   was prompted by evidence that dam proponents often made exaggerated
   promises to the people regarding the social and economic returns of
   their developments.

   People rallied around him and the campaign was successful.

   Despite the constant growth of conservation awareness in the country
   today, it is still hard to find people as hard working and dedicated
   to the survival of forests and wildlife as Boonsong.

   Many wildlife researchers contribute little more than copies of their
   reports  which all too often end up collecting dust on library
   shelves.

   ''Few of them will fight if the forest or species they have studied
   are in danger," Prayong commented.

   ''When Khao Yai National Park was threatened by a proposed dam
   several years ago, we did not hear anything from the people who had earned
   their biology degrees studying the species in Khao Yai."

   On the other hand, environmental activists who appear in the front
   row opposing destructive schemes in the forests are often listening only
   to their hearts, Prayong admitted.

   Their arguments are sometimes found inadequate for lack of a
   technical background.

   ''If the two groups combined, we would get more people like Boonsong,
   who always supported his arguments with accurate technical
   information from his own research."

   The doctor also proved that people with determination and dedication
   can achieve anything, regardless of their academic background. He was
   the author and co-author of many important books, including the three
   English-language ''bibles" on conservation in Thailand  ''Mammals of
   Thailand", ''Field Guide to the Butterflies of Thailand" and ''A
   Guide to the Birds of Thailand".

   Determined to illustrate his own books, Boonsong spent a year
   learning drawing and painting at the Poh Chang Art College in Bangkok when
   working on the bird guide.

   ''Boonsong seemed to spend more time and effort on conservation than
   medicines," recalled Jaruchin Napeetaphat, a biologist from the
   National Science and Technology Research Institute who worked closely
   with him during the last two decades of his life.

   ''I remember he once prescribed medicine that had been off the market
    for years because he spent more time in his natural history museum,"
   Jaruchin said with a smile.

   The ''natural history museum" was actually Boonsong's home office, in
   which a large collection of wildlife specimens and antlers were
   displayed for study. Part of the collection was gathered during
   Boonsong's early years, when he still hunted game in the forests.

   Jaruchin said Boonsong was aware of criticism that he turned to
   conservation only after he had hunted all the game he wanted.
   However, Boonsong had once explained that his hunting was all in the early
   years, when there was still plenty of wildlife in the forests.

   He was also strict about the rules of ''fair game". He would hunt
   only on foot and would not harm females or their young.

   ''Boonsong stopped hunting when he noticed that much of the wildlife
   had disappeared because more people were hunting with modern weapons
   and vehicles after the end of World War II," Jaruchin said.

   ''This concern prompted him to turn to conservation."

   His earlier collection of specimens became useful when the doctor
   worked on ''Mammals of Thailand". The book contains important details
   about each species, the various names, size, distribution and habits.

   Boonsong was known internationally. Asiaweek and Readers Digest
   referred to him as ''King of the Beasts" and ''Thailand's Mr Conservation".

   When praised, Boonsong sometimes joked that he was proud his hard
   work had contributed to the reduction of the forest cover in Thailand from
   50 per cent of the total area to 20 per cent.

   But today he must be proud, should his spirit and soul be around,
   that many people now give him whole-hearted credit for saving that
   remaining 20 per cent, mostly protected in national parks and
   wildlife sanctuaries.

   ''Perhaps, without his fight in those early years, we might have also
   lost this little remaining part of the forest to logging
   concessionaires and infrastructure project owners," Prayong mused.

   ''However, our forest will not be completely safe from greed unless
   we have more people like Boonsong."
 
  1