Dear Daniel:
I read your 4-page diatribe on why I as a Christian
do not fit your specific mold as an ex-witch.
Unfortunately, you have been exposed to Michael
Aquino's brand of Satanism; basically pure
psycho-babble, with a touch of histroy thrown in for
good measure.
Daniel, I am a REAL Christian. I was a REAL witch. I
accepted the REAL Saviour, Jesus Christ. I serve the
REAL God. Satan is only the fallen 'god' of this
world. He also is defeated. I think it is interesting
how I can cast devil's out and bind them, but you can
do absolutely nothing to me. My God IS God. You serve
a liar. I serve the Truth (Jesus Christ).
By the way, Mike Warnke is a Roman Catholic priest
in the Holy Orthodoc Catholic Church, Kentucky U.S.A.
He was proven to be a fake and his information is
slanted and much falsified. I didn't believe him from
the onset, especially after I saw him in person back
in 1989 in Texas. I am a Baptist Christian, and as
such I recognize that Roman Catholicism is NOT true
Christianity, but the cult of Marialotry.
As for my background in the Occult, I wasn't into
drugs. I did see many manifestations of unclean
spirits, and I was raised in a pseudo-Christian
household. I heard the gospel preached by an
Evangelist on March 27, 1988, Palm Sunday. The
bologney you typed me is so far off base I wanted to
throw up when I read it. I don't know where you live,
what country you are from, or what you think
Christianity truly is, but whatever you know, it is
entirely messed up! I bet you think that in Baptist
churches we have masses, priests, liturgical
vestments, celebrate saints, etc.. don't ya'? Got news
for you my friend! Roman Catholicism, 7th-Day
Adventists, Greek Orthodox, Mormons, Jehovah
Witnesses, Oness-Pentecostals, and Lutherans are NOT
going to heaven because they are NOT true Christians.
Baptists, Methodists, Presbyterians, Assembly of God,
Bible churches, and a whole host of others ARE true
Christians. And please don't trip up on the
Reformation, Baptists are NOT Protestants, for to be
so meant that we were initially a part of the Roman
Catholic Church which Baptists have NEVER been
throughout history. Baptists are simply Christians
renamed for realizing and teaching that baptism comes
AFTER salvation and not before, and that it is not
saving but symbolic of the death, burial, and
resurrection of Jesus Christ.
Regarding retired Lt. Col. Michael A. Aquino and his
"Temple of Set", Daniel have you ever heard of Presido
Army Base? Aquino was investigated for his alleged
involvement in abusing small children at the base's
child care facilities. Anything Aquino says I
personally take with a grain of salt. He ain't what he
thinks he is. LaVey has charisma to some extent.
Aquino is, how can I say this...B-O-R-I-N-G. Sorry,
but that is the way it is.
I know that Jesus Christ is God and that He exists,
because He lives in me. He answers my prayers Daniel,
everytime, all the time, according to His will for me.
Magick can't touch this! So in closing Daniel, you are
going to spend a literal eternity in a literal hell
because of your literal rejection of the literal Jesus
Christ. But Daniel, you CAN change and NOT go to hell,
man. Do you want to know how? E-mail me back to find
out, and by the way, WHERE else have you heard me on?
Thanx.
- Evangelist Robby Rush
Dear Robby...
You read my 4-page diatribe and then proceeded to prove exactly how you fit perfectly into my mold of an ex-witch turned evangelist. You fit into it far better than I could have imagined, which is actually very disappointing. I was hoping for some depth.
In case you really have no idea that your letter confirmed rather than denied my suspicions, here's a breakdown:
1.By saying that you are a REAL Christain, and were a REAL witch, by claiming that you actually did see little red sugarplum fairies etc.,
you confirmed that you still have no doubts about the efficacy of your
supposed magics. You have confirmed that you have never doubted them,
and, as I said, are probably incapable of imagining that your
hallucinations weren't real.
2.By refering to your parents as pseudo-Christian, crossed with the fact
that you continually refer derogatorily to Anglican/Catholic traditions
more so than most of the other sects you mention, indicates that you
were probably, as I guessed, raised in such a household. Why so? I
know that Baptists don't have the same sorts of masses, etc. as
catholics, becuse my parents were baptists. You have also referenced
the Jehovah's Witnesses as pseudo-Christians, and they also don't have
the same sorts of ceremonies. I am very familiar with The WatchTower
society's literature, and I suggest that you would do well to read some
of it. The attacks by many other Christian sects against the Jehovah's
Witnesses are all based on lies. I personally hate what they stand for
with a passion, but if you read what they had to say you wouldn't be
able to disagree. They base their beliefs strictly on the Bible, like
you, but unlike you they go past the mythological surface and actually
live by it in their daily lives. If you're going to use the standard
anti-jovie attack about unfulfilled prophecies, you need to recognize
the fact that they have long ago stopped with such predictions.
I gave no assumption about what occured in your church, beyond the
childhood thought control methods of all Christian sects, but you made
assumptions on what I would think based strictly upon your own
experiences. My guess now is that you were raised in a Catholic
household, though possibly Anglican or some breed of ethnic orthodox
sect.
Such sects, as opposed to Jehovah's Witnesses and other less
ceremonial/superstitious sects, tend to produce more magically minded
people. Aleister Crowley, Mike Warnke, and, come to think of it, all of
the most commonly referenced occultists of history, had their first
taste of ritualism during their childhoods as a result of such sects.
3.By refering to your parents as pseudo-Christians, you also confirm
that you rejected many of the things they taught you, and furthermore
that you continue to do so.
4.As for the presidio incident, here you play a game of pretending not
to know. This is a standard tactic in today's mass media, where no
matter what the evidence points to, the accusation sticks because it is
an effective weapon for the victim's opponents. You know, as well as I
do, that the evidence proved his innocence. The many holes in the
story, the admission of coercion on the part of the child's parents,
etc. did so very well. By referencing this as an attack on Aquino,
obviously making the assumption that I wasn't aware of it, you have used
a convenient but dishonest argumentative tactic, which shows that you
are grasping at straws. You gave no argument showing that Aqino's
history is wrong, you merely say so and merely move into the discredit
by personal follies tactic.
The Catholics are the largest and longest running Christian
denomination, though I know that they are no longer Christian. But all
Christian sects originate from them, whether any of them want to admit
to or not.
If you can find historical evidence of a currently existing baptist sect
that was formed prior to the reformation, beyond the bible itself as we
all know that Christianity is for the most part irrelevent to the bible,
archeologists and theological historians would be very interested.
How can you lable catholicism non Christian yet use the Bible as a
reference on God's word? It was, as you must know, a Catholic council
which assembled the many texts into the one volume. Also, the fact that
you take the time to let us know that you specifically refer to the King
Jame's Version, a work whose semi-forgery is implicit in it's very name,
is somewhat baffling.
But it makes perfect sense for a person who in one line says that he
doesn't match my assumptions and then one by one confirms them.
Last Installment
>