"Judicial activity" princip, -only in Israel.

-I am a victim of the social violence that is growing
in our country on the ground of ethnic intolerance.
-I have been injured physically and mentally up to
100% invalidity no only because heavy metal poisoning,
but because mutual conspire in corrupt medicine;

-In the helpless situation I could not defend myself
because existing of mutual -conspire in all society
area include the court as I -prove by proofs.
-The Israeli oligarchy together caused me invalidity.


-A group of lawyers with media persuade the public
as if we have the High Court for Justice as unique
in the world -open before each citizen for using as
tools for defending rights the weak citizen against
government's rampage.. -Unique in the world!..?

-I wish warn the people from eyewash: - because
in the real(!) these men closed the doors of High
Court( with the nice name "Justice" ) extremely
before a weak groups people as I am; -they gave
not me even to advent before their -honour judges!

-Then I suffered because the men of the court uses
the power as a factor of conspiracy and injustice.
-This hypocrisy will be -unmasking here.

-Critic of the wrong conception.
 -The concept "judicial activity" in Israeli court,
has proclaimed by the Israeli Supreme Court chief,
A. Barak; -under this idea a judge may does judgment
under -his conscience and understanding of justice.

 -We wish attend as the perception "judicial activity"
 no were proved by any scientific method (-I no know).

"Judicial activity" and International Law
(-The difference with Local Court function).

-"What is permissible for Jupiter, is forbidden for ox!"
-What seeks for our chief: -the justice or the power??


 There principle difference between the International
Court judicial activism with the Local Court function:

-The International Court "judicial activity", as its
authority given by the United Nation Organization
institutes for action in cases as sanction against
countries that rules by racist laws, or rules by
dictators regime, or against aggressors, or as action
against the discriminately judgment (as caused me),
against injustice or tendentious wrong verdicts
given in Local Courts as deprive the Human Rights
principle..etc. -Here activism is a natural notion.

-Please take Attention:
-The activism of International court is adequate
 with activism of his sovereign and the Law.

for Topics Click here

-In the case of World Court, when is reading
"activism" realty we mind executing the Law, -no
any freelance to do judgment as deprive with law.

-The International court no takes initiative to
conflict against his legislator, or do revision
the International law. -Because it is absurdism.

-For revision the International Law existing
 relevant forums nominated by United Nations.

-We wish attend that even his specific state, the
International Court acts carefully under the law
given by his sovereign, -the world organization.

-On the same principle have act the judgment of
a Local Court (Israeli court); -do Carefully
accordance the law, given by his parliament.
Otherwise the society could turn be a victim
of the court rampage or more badly.

-So, when our lawyers wish take for itself the
authority -analogical to the International Court,
as they places itself in any situation of absurd
(As Government acts against lawfully Government).

-We have attend that we oppose with the hypocrisy
"activism" of Israeli High Court chief Aharon Barak,
-as he try take for itself using the authority like
the area of international court for Human Rights;

-Of course, some of our lawyers wish use the same
notions as ("judicial activism") for legitimization
the Israeli court rampage against the voted
parliament and against citizen sought his justice
and rights by the law in our court, -then the
legislator have not give any option, that would
be given a possibility to hurt a Citizen Rights.




-Would we do analogy with World Courts activism,
there is contrarines between these two situation:

-The International Court acts against Countries and
the Local Courts, where has deprive the Human
Rights or hurts the International Law.

-But in Israeli realty the same notion has absurdism:
-It causes a public deception, when the conflicted
site, that she personally is the theoretical (as
potential and as real) factor and purpose of the
International Human Rights Court action (as the real
or potential offender), takes for itself the right
for "judicial activism" in his country and so take
ability for causing a wrong judgment oppose the Law.

-So he take for itself the function of legislator
instead the voted parliament together with function
as judge for itself, for his judges and for his folk.
-Even the historical tyrants has not so much power.

-I sure that the real destiny of these "inventors"
of "judicial activism" is secure their individual
egoistic interest of their clan, that meantime
have a dominance state in our country.

-For understanding the truth and justice of my
 plea it needs to study the evidence of realty.
-Others the casuistry of some our lawyers liable
 cause digression from discuss to the point.
for Topics Click here

-It is the Israeli absurdism;
-The interesting functionaries from Israeli court
by casuistry hypocrisy comments mixes difference
notions as they games with focus-pocus.

-But in cases of the International Court activism
against Countries and the Local Courts, where was
deprive the Human Rights or the International Law,
the authority of World Court bases on fulfillment of
the International Law, and the International Court
activity go adequate with decisions and principle his
sovereign, -Unites Nation Organization (-no itself).
-Then it minds as a natural and logical initiative.

-Partly, the purpose of the International Court
be the Law against the local "judicial activism"
as it causes by the Israeli court chief in much
of his offender cases in the realty.

-But In oppose to International Court condition,
the "judicial activity" by local court is lawless.


-In Israeli court the same "judicial activism"
seen as refined cynicism when the offender dress
his acts in suit of liberalism, humane defender.

-There illustration of using the terminology of
the International court for take more power;
-but after all, the excessive power using for
rampage the community by casta's oligarchy.

-I sure that in all events the function of
a court is watching the law of his country.
-The function of the judge's colleague, is
watching the law as guarantee for equality.

-The Israeli first judge try persuade his opponents
 that the "judicial activism" privilege needs for
 defending the Human rights of the feeble public !?

-About what secure Human Rights here are reading:
-If under a husk secure Human Rights the chief with
 some his colleagues from the Israeli court are
 causing tendentious violence of the Procedural Law,
 as these law is conventional by -International Law.


-Would better if the honorables will stop their
eyewash as though they need the "judicial activity"
principle as tools for secure Human Rights!

--The proofs that I  remind, is seen
that growing the power and given a free hand for
judge and absent any sibility of them, causing
more possible for rampage and injustice judgment.
(-As causing abuse and rampage against me).

( -It is my situation Exactly, because I wish to
submit petition against the Israeli Supreme Court
functionaries, against lawless activism as deprive
the Human Rights and deprive the law, as bound with
hypocrisy legalization rampage for causing lawlessness,
injustice, inequality between citizen, as I prove.)

-Do not forget, as we manage here no vain polemic
about any scholastic problems, but remember, that
with the "judicial activity" casuistry of our
courts' chief there bounding causes of wounded
destiny, life, health, freedom of much people.
There is a long gallery of injustice wounded
citizens(victims). Where there the humane moral?!

-This cases shows the real of "judicial activism"!

-The nature and the purpose of court to watch
a law of his country and equality for citizens;
-The judge could no take legislator's function,
as forbidden causing judicial rampage in court.

for Topics Click here


Sir Professor, where there your researches proves
 for needs of yours "judicial activity"!? -Why it?!

-Up this moment -in "activistic" phraseology of our
court chief A. Barak no was disclosed nothing from
science foundation his tesis "judicial activism", 
but the chief declared in all occasions
as each-one, who oppose to his "judicial activism"
perception, -he is a person absent understanding
in science of the advance(!) democracy !...


-We wish oppose to sir A. Barak that his declaration
absent proves or research is not science, it seen as
demagogy, event demagogy of exclusively personage.

-The court chief -personal no tried does any science
 experience for base the strange "activity" invention.
-It simply, the chief gave not any argue for defend
 his "child" because a simply reason: -the "judicial
 activity" here is an adventure, then these invention
 is absurd from its born, and so the notion can not
 have the scientist or logical explaining or proving.

-Then the chief instead to give the science prove;
-uses by the shocking Human Rights terms as
 toreador uses with red kerchief, and so stand up
 itself in pose of liberal, human rights defender.
for Topics Click here


-In other hand, in purpose to palsy his opponents
the chief uses the wild words attack; when he declare
with hypocrisy as the critic of "judicial activism"
could does only a not understand the science people.

-The chief adds to his phrase few words from
-human rights popular lexicon for neutralize
 any opponents of his "judicial activity",
 with these words finished his "scientific"...

-I wish remind that it's reading not only about
opposition of any engineer, but this phrase
directed against much learned lawyers, as most of
they has told against the "judicial activity", as
anti -scientist -perception.

-It's understanding that the misters' A. Barak
 opponents wishes no look as no learned man
 under wild word's attacks of the chief justice.
-No one can not to fight against the man that
 votes for Human Rights defending.

-Realty there absent any science basis with
 absent any purpose of Human Rights defending.

-For better understanding the truth of liberalism
 or hypocrisy this man, you have study his
"liberal" written in Supreme Court judgement,
and compare it with source and with evidences.
for Topics Click here

-Author of this message is an engineer as fail
-a victim of prey hate of several Israeli judges.
-A little part of damage cases are given -here.

I wish explain to public a philosophical vacuum
and absurdity of "judicial activity" perception.
-I will disclose the public danger consist in
the hypocrisy using here by Human Rights terms.

-I warn the public from basis mistake of explanation
and observation and a difference between a hypocrisy
declaration of purpose of the notion "judicial
activity" with a cruel realty because existing
negation between a false "liberal" declaration
 with a real anti-society action this man.
-Injustice sometime is equivalent with a murder.
 

for Topics Click here
- In advance democratical society systems
-The legislators functions of parliament are
separated from the executive power institute.

-Abuse the 1972 jew Russian immigrant..Why?!

-It's need know that even in the Supreme Court
 the proceedings is no managing carefully.
-In all my cases, -or it wasn't written nothing,
-or it was edited falsity text by judges.

-Even in my half-hour assertion in crime file session
in Supreme Court no was record even a word of defender.

-It was cynicism vulgarly, -nothing from liberalism.
-A little part of damage cases are given -here.

-The eyewash disturbs for public to seen and
understand the tyranny acts causes by our court.


-We wish attend that author this message has no
 pretension of absolutely right formulating in
 observation and critic the "judicial activism"
 concept because to much reasons; include a
 mistakes in the English language impression; -then
 if my reader see any mistake, please contact me;
 -Your opinion will be accept with thanks and the
 mistakes will be correct while disclosing.
 Please -
Contact me

The Plan of discussion:
In short time I plane translate the formulation
of the authors "judicial activity"  conception
of the Israeli judiciary, as"judicial activity",
"court dominance" and the"court independence".

-Then will be given our critic as logical checking
 each phrase told  by a "judicial activity" founders.
 We sure as the false "perception" will be destroyed.

- Meanwhile we live the critic as it were till now.

- I mind as even the old text, our previous critic
 message no left a place for "judicial activity"
 conception in advance democratic society.

 -Of course, the concept "judicial activity"
 continued annoy the community is any absurdism
 that possible only because cheating the folk
 by -conspiracy of corrupted our oligarchy.

 -Please read my message as it written before:
   - "Meanwhile":

- Would you wish understand what happened in our
  judiciary or wish do the right squalor, as you
  have study the cases of violation that I suffered
  -only because the judges hate and typanny acts.
  -Here you will found the right answer on the
  question who need the "judicial activity" lie.

-But before we will busy with mister A. Barak's
ideas we will remind several of foundations of a
world democratical systems concepts:
( as we understand it. )



- In advance democratical society systems
-The legislators functions of parliament are
separated from the executive power institute.

-The law is obligatory for one and all, equally.

-No any privilege for judge relative other citizen.

The judges job is to fulfil the law as it given.

-The comment has in the law is prefer of any
 judges comments given in any verdict.

-him in the law is written: -"permits" then the
  legislator meant -"mandatory to be executed".

-If the law gave an authority, then the
legislator meant that as obligatory for action.

-if in the law was given privilege for citizen
as social help or housing for repatriated, could
no be any agreement eliminates these given rights.

-If the law secure the rights of litigants about
  record the proceedings in trial, then could not
  be transcription damage or eliminate these rights.

-The court could no busy with giving a laws or
change the law or it comment written in the law.

-The court is a society institute for watch the
lawfulness, as equality of each citizen before law.

-In several countries for neutralization a
possibility of court's tyranny and in other hand
for securing the society from parliamentarian
intrigue cases has established a legislator's
consultative court, as institute independence
from court and independence from parliament.


Please pay attention:
-All advance democratical systems secure
the democracy freedom of their society by
limiting the judges authority in few ways(!):

-We remind here the jury judiciary system of USA,
or obligatory public deputy presence in time of trial.
-It is a factors of the experience of world justice.


-In parliamentary democracy the parliament as
 elected by the people institute is the sovereign.
         -The court is a hand of the Law.