The criteria of the aesthetic
Over the centuries, there has been much argument on what can
be called art, and what cannot. Many people proclaimed all
kinds of principles, but they were never comprehensive enough,
to be universally applicable. This lead to aesthetic
relativism, denial of the very possibility of distinguishing
art from non-art; some people believe that art is entirely
a matter of opinion, and no objective criteria of art can
be established at all.
Aesthetic views strongly depend on the economical and social
position of the person and are subject to historical development.
Nevertheless, there is a common core in all the diversity of possible
attitudes, which makes them all aesthetic; however this
"something" cannot be comprehended within aesthetics --- and even
on the basis of human reflexion in general; it must be discovered
in praxis, creative re-production of the world, including
both its material and ideal aspects.
In aesthetics, the aesthetic side of praxis becomes reflected
in the aesthetic categories: beauty, mimesis, the sublime,
the tragical, etc. However, neither of them is enough to distinguish
art from non-art, and it is only the unity of all aesthetic categories
that adequately reflects the specificity of syncretic creativity
as a necessary level of the hierarchy
of spirituality in general.
[General aesthetics]
[Unism & Art]
[Unism]
[Main sections]
[Page index]
[Keyword index]
[Search]
[Contact information]
[Guestbook]