FILM |
|
|
Five Easy Remakes
by Rick Rorapaugh
What makes a good movie? Or, more specifically, what makes a good movie remake? I often play the game of recasting my favorite older films
with today's actors, wondering for example how Russell Crow would play Rick in "Casablanca", or how Kathleen Turner would portray Margo Channing
in "All About Eve". Notice, I didn't say "how Russell Crow would play the Bogart part". One of the difficulties of remaking a film, as opposed to
restaging a play, is that the original movie physically exists, while a specific performance of a play exists only in memory. One might argue that Lee J. Cobb was a "better" Willy Loman than Dustin Hoffman was, but even if one had seen Cobb's original
performance from the 1940's, any comparision to Hoffman's is based on an imperfect recollection. A film is there for us to see again and again.
Should you argue that Harrison Ford's interpretation of Linus Larrabee in "Sabrina" was better than Bogie's, we can plop in the DVD's and go through them
scene by scene and compare the two. Of course, our opinions are just as subjective as in the case of Cobb vs. Hoffman, but at least we aren't relying
on memory. The "Sabrina" remake was, by the way, a better film than many reviewers originally allowed. Bogie outacted
Ford but Greg Kinnear's David Larrabee was more nuanced (for an essentially comic character) than William Holden's.
The best film remakes are like theatrical revivals; they stick close to the original source. Ian McKellan may have reset
"Richard III" in the 1930's, but it was still Shakespeare. The word is the thing, dear friends, not the staging. It helps, therefore, if the film one is remaking
had a good script to begin with. After that, the director can do whatever she bloody well wants to in terms of visual images, just as the theatrical director can
stage his revival as he sees fit (or as it fits the performance space). Here are five of my favorite films, remade for the 21st century. The originals were popular and
critical hits. Four of them were nominated for Best Screenplay Oscars, All of them could be brought back to the screen with minimal changes in the original
dialogue. I have cast them with actors I like who I thought would do a good job. In some cases I have listed less "commercial" alternative casting.
Who would you cast in these roles, and what other films would you like to see remade? Please send your ideas and comments to Essays and Observations.
We will print them in a future issue.
|
|
WHITE HEAT
This is one of my favorite
gangster films, and an Oscar nominee for best screenplay. Everyone remembers James Cagney's controlled madness as Cody Jarrett. He could have gone completely over the top but didn't.
Unbelievably, he wasn't even nominated for this role. "White Heat" would be a smash today, though the violence and sex might have to be ratcheted up a bit. I'd keep the 1940's setting though; better
clothes. As the mother-obsessed, epileptic Jarrett: Russell Crowe. Can you imagine him in the prison mess hall scene where Jarrett learns that his
beloved Ma is dead? The projector would explode ! As for Ma, I've always imagined her to be about 15 years older than Cody, which
would explain their mutual emotional dependency--they literally raised each other. It would also make the incestuous undertones in their relationship
a bit more understandable. The perfect Ma Jarrett? Kathleen Turner. She's the right age and erotic as hell. Alternative casting? Will Smith.
It would be the perfect chance for Smith to break out of the "nice guy" mold and exercise his considerable talent a bit more than he has heretofore.
|
SHANE
A good western that could have been better with different casting. Alan Ladd was fine as Shane. Van Heflin was an OK Joe Starrett, but Jean Arthur
was too shrill as Marion, Joe's wife, and poor wall-eyed Brandon de Wilde was just awful as Joey. Of course, this movie is famous for Jack Palance's signature
role as the sadistic "shootist" Wilson, and he was deservedly nominated for it, as was the screenplay based on Jack Schaefer's novel. So who do we cast in the
remake? Brad Pitt or Russell Crowe as Shane, Kurt Russell or Tom Hanks as Starrett, Frances McDormand as Marion, and any competent child actor (preferably an unknown) as Joey.
And Wilson? You want dark, edgy, and sadistic? Jim Carey, come on down! Alternative casting? Denzel Washington as Shane.
I know, I know, there weren't a whole lot of black gunslingers in 1880's Wyoming. Who cares? Denzel is so good he could make it work.
|
SOME LIKE IT HOT
I saw this with my parents in 1959, and I can still hear my mother laughing. She adored Jack Lemmon, and even though she wasn't particularly worldly she stll "got"
the humor in Billy Wilder's and I.A.L. Diamond's nominated screenplay. It's a classic comedy, so why change it? Pretend it's Neil Simon and just recast
the film. There's three ways to go with the leads here: all black, all while, or mixed. Whichever way you go, it's still going to be a smash hit. Try this on for size:
Will Smith as Joe/Josephine (played by Tony Curtis in the original) . Eddie Murphy replacing Lemmon as Jerry/Daphne.
Thandie Newton as Sugar Kane (do I have to tell you Marilyn Monroe originated the part?). OR: Robert Downey Jr. (if he's out
of jail), Jim Carey, and Julia Roberts. OR: Smith, Carey, and Roberts or Newton. Take your pick and start printing tickets.
|
TO KILL A MOCKINGBIRD
Another movie I first saw with my parents, at the Irvington Theatre on Frederick Road in Baltimore, circa 1962. "TKAM" was the first "adult" novel I ever read,
and I loved the film adaptation, even though Horton Foote's Oscar winning screenplay left out the morphine addiction sequence, which was a key passage
in Jem Finch's journey to adult understanding. Nonetheless, it was a good script and a good film, beautifully played by the child actors and most of the adults. I say "most"
because, Best-Actor-Oscar-for-his-performance notwithstanding, Gregory Peck's interpretation of Atticus Finch is often jarringly at counterpoints wtih Harper Lee's portrait of him
in her Pulizer-prize-winning novel. I saw "To Kill A Mockingbird" again recently, and Peck's acting choices in the courtroom scenes just plain miss the mark.
Strident and humorless, Peck's Finch preaches and admonishes from on high, whilst Lee's is down on the courtroom floor reasoning with and persuading
his neighbors, these jurors who share Maycomb County and its history with him. A remake of this film wouldn't make a lot of money, but it would get a lot
of Oscar nominations. There's only one choice to interpret Atticus Finch the way Lee wrote him: Tom Hanks.
|
BULLITT
Steve McQueen may not have been the nicest guy in town, but he sure was cool, or so I thought when I was 17 and first saw "Bullitt". It was at
the Westview Cinema, which was the first movie house in our part of town to use the word "Cinema" as part of its name. They had rocking chair seats, and
during the car chase scene I rocked forward on the dips and backwards on the inclines, so much so that I got motion sickness. They have since replaced
the seats, and a good thing too because the "Bullitt" remake is sure to have the most nauseatingly realistic CGI enhanced car chase that money can buy. What it
will also have is Frank Bullitt. Not a lot of dialogue in this, but characterizations are built on movement and attitude as well as words. I thought Steve McQueen was cool because
he made Detective Frank Bullitt cool. This time around, Russell Crowe or, alternatively, Johnny Depp gets to bite the Bullitt.
|
To the next page....MUSIC
E&O Front Page
TPOGI Home Page
Top of Page
|