The Assassination of President John F. Kennedy

© 2006 by Peter Jude Fagan

“For asmuch as many have taken in hand to set forth in order a narration of the things that have been accomplished among us,
“who from the beginning were eyewitnesses and ministers of the word, and they have accordingly delivered them unto us,
“it seemed good to me also, having diligently attained to all things from the beginning, to write to thee in order, . . .
“that thou mayest know the verity of those words in which thou hast been instructed.”

Lk.1:1-4

First and foremost, in order to assassinate the President — any President — and get away with it you have to be able to control the Secret Service, the FBI, the CIA, the autopsy and the new incoming President. If you cannot control all three of these agencies, the autopsy and the new incoming President, then you will probably get caught.

Just a superficial review of the events that surrounded the attempted assassinations of Gerald R. Ford and Ronald Reagan reveal why this is true.

Immediately after Lynette Fromme, Sara Jane Moore and John Hinckley attempted their foul deeds the Secret Service arrested them.

Then the SS began an internal investigation to determine if there was an internal plot to assassinate the president. The FBI began a domestic investigation of them in order to determine if there was a domestic conspiracy involved and the CIA began an international investigation to determine if their was an international conspiracy involved. (All three investigations proved negative.)

If you cannot control the autopsy of the victim, then the evidence gained from it could very easily point directly to you instead of to the person you want to frame for the killing.

As for the new President, there is no sense in killing the President if, in the very least, the new one is not going to follow the policies you want to bring into the White House and the executive branch of the government. If the new President just continues the policies of the assassinated President, then the assassination becomes pointless.

In 1963, there were only a hand full of men alive who had enough influence to control the Secret Service, the FBI and the CIA. The names Harry S. Truman, Dwight D. Eisenhower, Richard M. Nixon and Lyndon B. Johnson immediately come to mind.

(I am not suggesting that all these men conspired to kill President Kennedy. I am just saying that because of the potential influence they had in the government, they immediately become suspect.)

Four others who also come to mind are: Allen W. Dulles, the director of the CIA under the Eisenhower/Nixon administration, John A. McCone, director of the CIA under Kennedy, James J. Rowley, the head of the Secret Service at the time of the assassination and J. Edgar Hoover, the director of the FBI at the time.

There may be one or two other individuals but if there are they are unknown to me. Truman, Eisenhower, Nixon or Johnson could easily have exerted some measure of control over all three of the aforementioned agencies, while Dulles, McCone, Rowley and Hoover might have needed help from the others.

Fidel Castro could not have killed President Kennedy, anti-Castro Cubans could not have done it, organized crime could not have done it. Nor could Khrushchev and the Soviet government have done it. They just did not have the necessary political influence to accomplish an assassination of the President of the U.S. and get away with it. They could not control the subsequent investigations and autopsy that were sure to follow.

Those who advocate that any of these people killed the President are not following logical thought. It is true that they could have murdered President Kennedy. But how could any of these also control the SS, the FBI, the CIA, the autopsy and President Johnson? It is impossible for any of them to control all three agencies, the autopsy and Johnson. Hence, they did not kill President John F. Kennedy.

However, evidence indicates that those who did kill President Kennedy used either a Mafia hit teem or anti-Castro Cubans as a hit teem in order to throw suspicion away from themselves and toward one of these two groups of people.

This is what logic and the facts say and in order to solve a crime — any crime — one has to follow logic and the facts. One cannot obtain the truth by starting with a preconceived idea of what that truth may reveal.

This is true regardless of whether or not lone assassins killed John F. Kennedy, Martin Luther King and Robert F. Kennedy or if they were all killed by a conspiracy of men who wanted to control the White House and the executive branch of the government and these three men (and other prominent Americans) were standing in their way.

Before starting out, one must take note of a stumbling block in trying to discover who killed John F. Kennedy, Martin Luther King and Robert F. Kennedy. When studying these assassinations one will discover that there is a lot of information that points to Castro, anti-Castro Cubans, the Mafia and even the Soviet Union. (As for the lone assassin scenarios, I have already proven – and will do so again here – that Oswald, Sirhan and Ray were framed by the real assassinators.)

It is my belief that much of this “disinformation” was manufactured by those who killed John and Robert Kennedy and Mr. King. They did this in order to try and confuse and mislead those who sought the truth about the assassinations of these men. In order to discern the truth one must stay focused on reason and logic. One must continually ask them self: Is this reasonable? Is this logical?







1