Massive land confiscation, settlement expansion,
house demolition, by-pass road construction, arrests, torture and administrative
detention, closure and the continued control of
Jerusalem reflect the various
methods the Israeli government continues to use to maintain permanent control
over the Occupied Palestinian Territories. Indeed, the Israeli government,
under first the Labor and then Likud administrations, used the signing
of the Oslo Accords in September 1993 as a kind of smoke-screen to pursue
policies which unalterably change the situation on the ground in the Occupied
Territories, and make permanent Israeli control an historical inevitability.
The Current Situation: Human Rights Violations Under the
Likud Government
The election of Benyamin Netanyahu as Prime Minister accelerated
government approved or mandated action against Arab residents of Jerusalem
and in the West Bank. Indeed, the guidelines for the government of Israel,
approved in June 1996 by all the constituent parties of the Cabinet headed
by Benyamin Netanyahu, stated openly that the Netanyahu government would
break from the basic understanding of Oslo, that of land for peace, and
would set its own principles.
The new government officially opposed the
creation of any Palestinian state, the right of return of Arab refugees,
insisted on the existence, security and expansion of Jewish settlements,
eternal control over Jerusalem, and permanent control over water resources.
The irony of Netanyahu's opposition to the Oslo Accords is that they, like
no agreement the Likud party could have dreamed of in 1992, allow for this
Jewish consolidation to occur; first by successfully incorporating many
of these policies into the realm of the "peace process, and second by removing
the issues of Jerusalem, settlements, refugees, borders, security and water
from the arena of international law to a lopsided negotiating table. Since
the Israeli elections, Netanyahu has proceeded down the same path as his
predecessor, except with the use of inflammatory and humiliating rhetoric
that has alienated his negotiating partners.
His initial refusal to meet
President Arafat, his delayed re-deployment from Hebron, the humiliating offer to re-deploy from less than 10% of the West Bank in the next phase of redeployment,the continuing blockade of the West Bank and Gaza, increased house demolitions
and repeated announcements of government sponsored settlement expansion
further alienated him from President Arafat, the Palestinian public and
the rest of the Arab world. |