|
|
|
Index:
|
WARNING:
Still a very badly automated translation! Please drop by later...
(the translation is REALLY bad..., sorry)
yeah,
it sounds like junk -do not laugh - we are working on it! If you feel
able to translate the original German text
into english, please contact us.
Argument:
Foreigners take our workstations away!
Counterargument: We have unemployment of 5%, which makes with 80
million inhabitants four million humans without work in Germany in the
meantime already. If we would send now four million foreigner away, then
it would have nevertheless no more unemployed persons give far been missing!
Each humans operate in any way for the society and thus for its fellow
men. And foreigners do that also. And thus each humans create also again
workstations. If humans operate and cash earned, then he will output the
cash (if he not a rich is whole, on a Swiss brings his cash to which account)
and things buy, which must be produced again by workers. Thus the economy
functions. The more is bought, the more worker is used and paid, the more
earned and the to more bought and so on. That is the quite simple principle
of capitalism. Another example would be humans, is open it a foreigner
or not, a loading. It adjusts a few people and creates thus workstations.
Thus it relieves the state, because it and the workers not further unemployment
pay or social welfare assistance needs to pay and pay additionally these
people then the controls, which come the treasuries too good. If however
now the foreigners from Germany were away sent, then all these operations
would close, enormous totals at tax receipts would be omitted, the purchasing
power enormously would reduce and many people, which have now work, would
become unemployed. Additionally, if they would not operate, you would
then not grumble that they live at the costs of your control cash?
Argument:
We have however nevertheless so many unemployed persons!
Counterargument: Tja, is probably because of the system and particularly
to progress. Many of the work, which was performed in former times by
humans, are performed today by machines. Another reason is probably the
large competition in our society. The rich people, which multinational
companies, which become factory owners and buyers ever more richly and
to delete the whole profit in, which is made in the economy, while the
workers get only a quite small section. But the rich people do not buy
from the cash, them put it are available on and thus fewer cash in the
circulation and. For the factory owners it is cheaper to let Maschienen
for it operate because then they can produce more more cheaply. But this
system will not always function, because will not be able the people that
all no more to pay. But the foreigners have to do with all that nothing.
They are only one part of the whole system.
Argument:
What is with the immigrant workers? Those nevertheless really take work
from us away!
Counterargument: It tunes that immigrant workers perform many work,
for which German workers would be available. But they do not take themselves
the work, it " are adjusted ". Even in the case of government jobs, e.g.
the realm tag change moonlighters became discovered, because they are
simply cheaper. A German worker, who operates legally, cannot offer itself
to too so cheap prices, because it must pay controls. But it is the debt
of the immigrant worker that it earns in Germany to a minimum wage as
a moonlighter still better than in its country? That is unfair, but it
is not their debt. It is a further point, at which the system failed.
And times quite honestly: Also YOU would change nevertheless surely quite
rapidly to a better paid job, if the opportunity would be offered!
Argument:
All the asylum-seekers are situated only on the putrid skin!
Counterargument: What are they to now do? If they operate, they
take allegedly your workstation from you away and if not, they are lazy
to rum! That asylum-seekers do not operate, is not quite certainly their
debt. It is not permitted to them to operate in Germany and make cash.
They have thus no chance to drive the economy in front since it is forbidden
to them. They cannot at all differently, than on very low public funds
live, which receive them. Additionally they must always live in the fear,
to be again back sent into a country, in which frequently punishments
and torture threaten them.
|
