Crime detection and punishment should not be countermanded or hampered by legislative or judicial provisions to the detriment of our society or which undermine the security of our Nation. Our Legislative and our Judicial Branches of Government should make a distinction between Constitutional and Legislative Protection for our Law Abiding Citizens and our Nation as distinguished from provisions defining Crime and Punishment of offenders for the purpose of protection of our society and Nation.

Today, in the light of great technology being available to criminals, and terrorists, together with the speed with which the perpetrator of a crime or terrorist can escape the jurisdiction, IT IS NECESSARY TO MAKE GREAT TECHNOLOGICAL FAR REACHING AND EASILY OBTAINABLE DISCOVERY WITH SPEEDY PROVISION FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT AND MEANS OF DETECTION IN ORDER TO PROTECT OUR SOCIETY, establish justice, insure domestic tranquillity, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity…as per the preamble and the Constitution of the United States of America.

Case in point is the trial and conviction of the criminals who perpetrated the Oklahoma Bombing Disaster of a Federal Building. The magnitude of this crime was so great, that the suspects should have been subjected to 'Truth Serum' and whatever means is necessary to ascertain whether any foreign enemy nations or any other collaborators were involved. Discovery should be without fear that the evidence procured may be set aside because of the methods used to procure it. WE STILL DO NOT KNOW! IT IS OUTRAGIOUS THAT THE MOR-ES OF OUR SOCIETY ARE SO TWISTED AND WRONGLY CONSTRUED, SUCH AS TO PREVENT THE DETECTION, CONVICTION, PUNISHMENT AND EXECUTION OF ALL OF THE REAL PERPETRATORS OF THE CRIME, AND THE TOTAL INTELLIGENCE NECESSARY FOR DISCOVERY AND TO GET TO THE BOTTOM OF IT. The security of our Nation is at stake. Here the rights of an individual suspect must not be allowed to prevail over the Sovereign Right of Our National Security.

AGAIN, (See Our Jury System Revision Proposal) it should not be reason for disqualification of a juror, mistrial, or reason to change venue for trial purposes - because of the very valuable and informative procedure of our Free Press and Freedom of Speech, the manner in which evidence is procured, or because the juror may have read about it in the newspapers or heard about the crime or tort on TV.

In our opinion, Free speech, freedom of press should be paramount. These and the publicity are the natural consequences of the commission of a crime. These are the just results that a criminal should be subjected to and not protected from.

Especially in these days of terrorism by enemy and belligerent forces, We need everything going for us as a Nation by way of crime detection and punishment, in order to survive as a Nation and Free Society.

We do not feel that a judge should disqualify a bona fide confession or evidence because of the manner in which it was procured. We feel that such action is an obstruction to our having a badly needed crime detection and punishment procedure. We feel it is more important to catch the criminal or terrorist and to deter the crime and prevent the execution of the terrorist act, than to protect the criminal.

To do otherwise is to bare the breast of the Nation and our law abiding citizens to the knife of the assassin, protect the criminal, forsake the victim, and to have little or no deterrent or punishment for crime.

<- Back to Last Proposal | Index to Wake-Up Call | To next proposal ->

All content, including assemblage of HTML Code is Copyrighted.
© 1997 Codee Elevans, Author, All Rights Reserved.

Webmaster: Wil Vaught, Last Updated 4 October 1997

---

Visitors since 13 September 1997

---

This page hosted by Get your own Free Home Page