3 | Who Wants To Be In Central Perk? | 5 | Geri's Dates |
5 | Tube Travel: A Primer (1) | 7 | The Monologue |
7 | Spoilers and Willow | 7 | Cheap CDs |
7 | Tube Travel: A Primer (2) | 10 | The Ramble |
10 | Coffee | 10 | Top Pop |
13 | Jared, pictures, relationships | 13 | Patch panels |
15 | Cults and Coffee | 16 | Bah and humbug |
17 | Airport | 17 | Moremusic |
23 | Brokedown Palace | 26 | Christmas Television |
30 | Debt forgiveness |
|
Vic Haven't done a Weaver's Top Discs in a little while... Browsing through the magazine rack yesterday, I noticed the cover of "Now!" magazine. It's one of those cheap weekly glossies that live in celebrity-ville. Cameron Diaz and Jared Leto (yes, MSCL's Jordan) were inside, parading as a couple. And there were two or three photos of the two climbing rocks, with Jared not wearing all that much. Cam's also booked for a part in "Charlie's Angels", a movie that came in for much discussion on Planet Claire as a project that might star Claire Danes (yes, MSCL's Angela.) But that never came to pass. And one that almost turned into an article for Slashdot, but didn't. There's a project to take pictures of historic houses in the UK, digitise them, and shove them somewhere on the web. All fine and dandy, one would have thought. Only, the tight-wads that live in the houses are not impressed. "It makes our houses a target for thieves and criminals!" they whinge. "People will be able to download our name, address and holiday plans, and then rob us in the dead of night." Let's just stop panicing and look at a few facts. Will the person's name be listed? Nope. It's the building that's being preserved for posterity, not the owner. Try to divorce the two. Will the address be listed? Only the parish is, making it difficult for a casual visitor to find the place. Criminals that do their planning would not be deterred. Are holiday plans available? Not on your nelly. That would be the height of stupidity and folly. The misguided owners are demanding that the project be pulled. They have no business doing that, quite frankly. One: it's images of the buildings that are being preserved - images that are acquired perfectly legally. In a hundred years, there will still be a sub-ether wireless tap into these data, even though the owners will be communing with worms. Two: there's nothing that isn't already in the public domain. The Land Registry is informed of all property transactions, and makes this info available to anyone who pays for it. Three: the criminal element won't find this of much use. They'll still have to go round, stake out the place, and wait for their moment. Does being rich mean that you're an idiot, paranoid, misinformed or some combination of the above? I think we should be told. The finale of Friends 2 aired a few days back. The one where Rachel sings "Copacabana", and Monica splits with Richard, and Chandler sets himself up an online relationship. It sets me thinking about how these things work. We have enough success stories here: Ross and Sara, Jonathan and Shana, Mark and shimelle, Bridget and Tim, Alan and Angela, Phil and Dana... And there have been failures. What went wrong? Failure to communicate. Refusal to communicate. And then wondering why things seemed to be taking an unwanted path. Keeping lines of communication open is difficult in a normal relationship. When there's huge distance involved, it can be worse. There needs to be a heck of a lot of trust, and the honour not to abuse that trust. There needs to be a willingness to share, to be honest, to show all parts of oneself. Not just the bits one wants the world to see. Honesty, integrity, trust, that's what's needed. And brings us back to Chandler and Janice. Cheating on her husband, then cheating with her husband. Oh. My. Gawd. FrogLady wrote: For example, what bloody tall eejit decided it was a good idea to install a patch panel 10 feet high? and Directly over the server so it's impossible for yours truly(5'5) to reach the cables? Then they always end up in completely inaccessible places, such as over the server, or slammed next to a wall. Grouch. It's hard to trace where things are going when you can't see/reach where they're installed. the client decides not to stay past three for me to actually finish the job. Fine. I get no food beyond a nasty little protein bar but you get to make your dumb golfing tourney. Bleh. I spit on you. People who want something done now, but can't be assed to wait to see it through deserve to be shot. People who abandon work to go to a golf tournament deserve to be kidnapped and forced to sit and watch a baseball double-header between the Marlins and the Expos. Somehow, I don't think they'd enjoy that. From the plane to Australia, Bridget Darcy wrote: In summary, don't worry. This will not be a problem. Going round a large supermarket this morning, there were a number of things that caught my eye. Tinsel is up everywhere. Pourquoi? It's still sunny and (sort of) warm outside, and the decorations aren't supposed to go up until it gets cold. That's why they never go up in Florida, and never come down in Alaska. Huge boxes of chocolate, selling at 25% more than the usual price, or 50% more than I'd expect to pay. They're staying on the shelf. And posters advertising their non-opening hours. "We'll be closed on Christmas Day," they say. OK, this is not a surprise. "Check details in this store for hours on Boxing Day and December 27." Fair call, allow a little bit of subsidiarity in making these profitability decisions. "We'll be closed again on New Year's Day and Sunday January 2." That does confuse; surely there will be a sizeable market in coffee, eggs, bacon and especially asprin over this period. Still, guess I'll have to stock up on supplies beforehand. Don't bother trying to book, Pizza Hut will be closed for the millennium night, according to their posters. How do they know what their staff will be doing next year, and why would they want to shut in the middle of August anyway? Oh, do they mean New Year's Eve? Why didn't they say so?! The marketing bonanza that is the Christmas record market is getting under way with vengeance. Viewers to "Top of the Pops" and "CDUK" will have seen the cover of "It's Only Rock n' Roll" by a gazillion B-rate stars all singing one line each. It's based on an idea the BBC had a few years ago, getting dead famous people to sing bits of "Perfect Day," the Lou Reed song, and making a mint. Why is this new one a pile of pants? "Perfect Day" was a great song that somehow improved with the cover. "It's Only...." was never good, and it's not been improved. At all. I mentioned the re-release of John Lenin's "Imagine" last week. Oirish bore band Westlife will be covering Terry Jacks' maudlin "Seasons in the Sun," and Steps cover Kylie's "Better the Devil you Know" (That the ABBA cover you don't, natch.) My question is: who will provide the Chocolate Salted Balls this year? Last year, the Spice Girls were odds-on favourites to provide the festive best-selling single, only to be beaten to the punch by Isaac Hayes aka Chef Off Of South Park, with said Chocolate Salted Balls. Can some comedy, strange or merely interesting single cut through the guff and tedium to provide a fitting end to the 1999 parade of best-sellers. Whatever the answer, I'll find out on Boxing Day, and let the rest of you know later. Remember, if you've read through this ramble, you're entitled to a Christmas card from the Thanksgiving get-together. Even if you didn't read through this ramble, you're still entitled to a card. Mail me off the list with your postal address. Entries must be with me by Friday 26 November: ie Friday next week. Late submissions will only get a card signed by me, which ain't the same at all. Sara: Heathrow. The official gateway to London, where all the major flights have traditionally landed. Terminal 3 is a hell-hole - I was there on 12.26.97, and it was packed to the rafters, even though the flight I was going on was only 30% full. Avoid it if you can. Gatwick. Awkward to get to from the Midlands, Gatwick was the main charter airport for London and scene of some of the worst delays. The airport's been designed to keep large numbers of people occupied, and consequentially is spacious and airy. Given a choice between the two, I'd pick Gatwick. Manchester. Terminal One was redeveloped in 98, and now features a glass wall providing great views out on to the main runway. It's a plane-spotters delight, and also provides good, roomy places to wait. It can get crowded in high summer, so take a trip to Terminal Two, which is underused and an architectural marvel. Train links to the city centre. Toronto. Lester B Pearson airport is stuck away from the city, and doesn't have a connecting train (yet.) Terminal 2 - the only one I've visited - is a long, thin strip on two levels. Great for walking around, though the departure lounges are small and stuffy. St John's. Will be rebuilt in stages this winter, so my impressions are out of date. Sadly, much of the frontier post charm of the old building will be lost, and passengers from trans-Atlantic flights will be able to take an airbridge to the Customs house, and won't get to descend metal steps. I've also been to Bucharest and Athens airports, but that was many years ago and about 4am, so I'll not pass judgement. It's only 36 hours since I kicked at the stasis that is paralysing the contemporary music scene here. But something undeniably stupid has fallen into my lap. "Chocolate Salted Balls" it is not, but the Solid Gold Chartbusters have become my new hope for some insanity over the tedious days of mid-December. "I want to have a 1-2-1 with you" is the brainchild of Jimi Cauty, the bloke who used to be half of the KLF. It has to be heard to be believed, so if you've unmetred telecoms, head to virgin's previews and find some more. For those wanting a word description: it's the techno tune based on those annoying mobile phone rings that's been crying to be made the last few years. More irritating than The Sunscreen Song, more catchy than Mambo #5, more lyrically inspired than Imagine. It's this year's nine day wonder; nine days that will co-incide with the Christmas singles sales period. In other news, Steps was on Radio 1 yesterday, launching a tirade against unauthorised merchandise. The biggest teen band in the country has spawned a bunch of unofficial merchandise (calendars, books, keyrings) that pays them no royalties. "Don't buy these items!" exhorts the band. "It's just like music piracy, and if it continues the record companies will go down and there will be no more pop music." Is that a fact? It must be, because Lee Steps said it. So, if I go out and buy the Unofficial Steps Annual, it will single-handedly bring down EMI Records, allowing a system that promotes artistes on the basis of merit, not profitability? It brings attention to Sister Machine Gun at the expense of Lowlife? Well, in that case, I'm right behind it. How much is that unofficial annual again? First Lady of Cool Things, chellebelle, replied Seriously, though, the label gets a cut of the merchandise such as the official album, as does the band itself. The unofficial stuff all goes back to the publisher, with nothing to label or group. at any rate, you and i and the rest of the world population are not going to shut down a record label for buying some unofficial datebook or whatever. since you brought up sister machine gun, there was an announcement yesterday on the sister machine gun newsgroup that a certain radio station out of chicago known for its "alternative" format is going to pick up "Carbon Copy" as part of its regular rotation in February. more details as they become available ... some things you might find interesting, iain (and several others on this list, perhaps) ... the webmaster of www.smg.org (the official sister machine gun website) attended webnoize 99, a convention of music industry folks and web folks that explores the latest and greatest as well as the projected future of music with respect to the internet. the convention is held in los angeles. www.webnoize99.com for more details about the event... a few days earlier, real had had their scan your hard disk for all files plot exposed. truste took no significant action. |
|
It's fair to suggest that Brokedown Palace is based on a cliche. Two Western girls skip off to the far east, and get involved in a dodgy drugs deal. In real life, the kids protest their innocence, get sentenced to ten years in a dingy cell, have their case picked up by a newspaper in pursuit of a quick circulation boost, and come home after a year to slink back into the obscurity from where they so briefly rose. As in real life, so in this film. There's a slight twist: rather than a tabloid newspaper, the two get followed around by a film crew in a fly-on-the-wall manner. The film's realistic credentials are firmly set out. The two head off for that rite of passage for rich kids; spend some time in the "exotic" far east, where Chinese takeaways are a way of life, unscrupulous landlords rule the city, and there's a McDougal's on every corner. Quite why they have to go to Thailand to experience this, and not - say - Manchester, is an avenue that never looks like being explored. But I digress. Darlene and Alice - the two leading characters - get busted at the airport, thrown into jail, and are assigned an unfeasibly attractive lawyer. With an American accent, natch. Now, what exactly are the possibilities of getting a) a lawyer with an accent indistinguishable from one's own in a country 10,000 miles from home; and b) said person being almost as hunky as a hundredweight of corn husks. "Not totally improbable, given the necessity for a lawyer that speaks your own language", and "Do us a favour, mate, this ain't never gonna happen." Remember, folks, 98.7% of all lawyers are pig ugly. The others are the ones that star on tv and film. This is not a movie filled with complex legal meanderings, though it might help to have a pencil and paper to hand to write down the key points of the plot. This is not a movie that shows anyone in a good light; the host country's concept of justice is shown to be different from that of the United States, and hence to be stinkingly rotten; while the United Stations around whom the plot revolves tend to get a little bitter, twisted and introverted. There are many points when an Angela Chase voiceover would prove useful. Ultimately, though, this is not a movie that shows the makers in a good light. Leafing through back copies of "Planet Claire", I find that the ending sequence was radically altered in post-production. The film suddenly gets a definitive ending. To leave the movie hanging, shorn of resolution, would have improved it no end. The acting is first rate, and - despite my misgivings over the basic plot - the scripting is great. However, the effectiveness of the movie is diminished greatly by the ending. Rating: Don't pay full price. Wait for the matinee, or rent it from the video store in six months time. Well, the tabloids printed guides to television over the Christmas and New Year period yesterday. Highlights include: BBC ONE: 3pm HM The Queen Sounds gripping. What's on the other side? ITV: 6pm Who Wants To Be A Millionaire? I think we'll be seeing a lot of Chris Tarrant that night. Later... Boxing Day Is that the long-form version of TBA? Not quite. Fast forward to New Year's Day And, er, that's it. Hey, a day on Channel 4 without an episode of Countdown! This is not going to last!! Elsewhere, New Year's Eve Channel 5 will be running all their programmes manually, in case their computers fry at the turn of the year. Chances of seeing a major cockup caused by someone inserting the wrong tape? Minimal - here's their schedule. No-one will notice if they stick the wrong one in! It's a swindle! Remember, folks, you can avoid ten days of tedious television by joining the fun in Mark Town. Write now to avoid disappointment. Sarah George: I dont knwo if any of you knwo anythign about Jubilee 2000--but i got somegood news First off Jubilee is the campeign(sp) to clear all the debts fro all the 3, 4 and 5th world countires. You prolly know of it from NetAid and all the stuff Bonno and Wyclef Jean did. Anyways... It was announced on Much Music today that the US desided to clear ALL its debts! Hopefully Canada and the other countries will be next! Hate to rain on your parade, but this is a very complex issue, and the treatment it's been getting this past year or two has been misleadingly - and scandalously - simplistic. |
front | local | mscl | music | news | sport |
mail me |