What can be said about one of movie history's greatest trilogies? Yes, really, the Matrix movies have spawned a generation of pseudo-philosophers and math geeks (none of these are bad things). And that is really a good thing, considering the masses are becoming more and more like plain ol' mindless tech-zombies. Anyways, I won't rant on that. Instead, I will say that the thoughtful goodness of Matrix 1 and the clean-cut action of Matrix 2 were both missing and/or sadly distorted and meshed together in Matrix 3. Did anyone else get the feeling that the Wachowskis invented an idea too good to be let go? So, there really is no easy way to say goodbye to Neo (Keanu Reeves), Morpheus (Laurence Fishburne) and the rest except to piece together some soupy graphics, pretend like there's more to philosophize about, and wave ciao. No really...what I'm trying to say is that no one wants to see the end of the Matrix movies, but "it is inevitable." And there is no perfect way to end anything this good. Hence a dappier, sappier, cheesier Matrix 3. Plot-wise: this one is the finale to the machine vs. human war. Two sides fighting each other, unknowing that another enemy lies between. The same fun characters appear: Niobe (Jada Pinkett-Smith), Merovingian (Lambert Wilson), Persephone (Monica Belluci), Seraph (Collin Chou), etc. Want a spoiler? The movie will end. And it will end with an "eh"? Did I like Matrix Revolutions? After one viewing, yes and no. Yes, because it is supposed to provide some sort of conclusion, I can't get enough of Neo's blind love for Trinity, and it's funny to hear Trinity call the Merovingian, "Merv". No, because I can't figure out what the conclusion is and I have a sinking feeling there may not be one.
*Upon a second viewing, I think I need to retract from my notion that the Wachowski's are in over their heads. In fact, I would say they know exactly what they are doing, but probably didn't show that as much as an audience would have expected in Matrix Revolutions. I must also revise the standpoint that the Matrix is a trilogy, when actually it is a 2-part movie made in 3 parts. I think Matrix 1 stands well on it's own, but 2 & 3 require a viewing as a whole. This is, however, debatable. The second viewing allowed me to divert my attention from the action and fighting and more into the details of what is actually going on. As in, what is the purpose of the new characters? What is this war really about? That sort of stuff. I don't think you'll NEED two viewings to ENJOY the movie (it actually, it very good), but you will probably need at least two viewings to understand the spectrum of what the Matrix movies intends to cover.
GRADE: B+
Never have I felt so wretchedly emotional over a movie (and book). The Notebook is adapted from a Nicholas Sparks book of the same name. Anything by Sparks is sure to be sappy, but given the right cast and crew, you're not likely to be dissatisfied. The Notebook interplays between two generations, an elderly man (James Garner) reading from "a notebook" to an elderly woman (Gena Rowland). The other generation is a pair of teens (Ryan Gosling and Rachel McAdams) enjoying the summer of their youth and the findings of first loves. The realization by the young girl's parents that the couple are of two separate economic worlds splits the two apart. One world war later, the girl is on the cusp of marriage, only to find her childhood love in the newspaper. They meet, the emotions of youth return, and they are now forced to make choices that will change their lives forever. (How's that for an ad?) Director Nick Cassavetes weaves a spectacular and beautiful world in both generations. What surprised me is that the sappy potential of such a movie was not at all exploited onscreen. This is a truly remarkable and visually stunning movie of intense emotional depth and themes. Sure to be a cult classic among chicks and hidden favorite of supposed men.
GRADE: A+